Talking Footy

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Didn't the Raiders make the finals last year as well? Yet they still come last in the crowds!

Pathetic. Raiderdave probably scares a few away

ah check the actual figures dog shit for brains ....

lots of probs internally with our mob throughout 2012
but they came home with a wet sail & all was forgiven .. as they were 2nd last at rnd 13
& still 13th 8 weeks out ....
came as a huge surprise to raiders fans that their side mades the playoffs in the end
so their support was not reflective of their eventual finish in 2012

the brumbies did it the other way .... led the australian s15 conference all year ... til the last round & they ended up missing out altogether
I couldn't stop doing these
they only averaged 14K
if the Raiders had been in the top 4 of the NRL like the brumbies were in essence in the s15 ... our smallest crowds would have been 14K
.. let alone our average

then there were the midgets
& Canberrans just laughed their tits off at them
wot a pack of F'ing *********

Raiders smallest crowds would have been 14k let alone your average? LOL! Your shit clubs average crowd hasn't been over 14k since 1995!

Ahh Raiderdave you never fail to amuse.

24,450 to a final V the Sharks this year
26,760 to a final V the Tigers in 2010.. ( sold out within an hour of tickets going on sale to the public ) ... demand for this game was that high a crowd of between 35 & 40,000 would have been drawn if canberra had a venue with that sort of capacity
a window to the potential following a winning & stable Raiders side has ... no other side in the region has support like them & the response to their success in the last 2 finals at home proves they have an army waiting to follow them if they could just get a bit of consistency about them ..
following the Raiders is quite litterally like riding a roller coaster ......

then we have the Midgets & their fudged turnouts in Canberra & freebies given away like confetti
ya know theres a saying in Canberra akin to a road safety message you may have seen

pay to watch the midgets play..... bloody idiot !!

24k to a final. 10k average home crowd...... =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

Xman wrote:

24k to a final. 10k average home crowd...... =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

gee whats better
5K average home crowds ..... & not getting near a final in the next 5 years
or
the Raiders figures ..

marcus the ****

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

24k to a final. 10k average home crowd...... =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

gee whats better
5K average home crowds ..... & not getting near a final in the next 5 years
or
the Raiders figures ..

marcus the ****

ahhh Dave, comparing your homeland team to the newest and last placed AFL expansion team......

And while we're at it, claiming the Giants fudge their crowd is fine, but then be prepared for some back. Even most NRL fans believe the Raiders inflate their crowds, yet can still only claim 10k!

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

24k to a final. 10k average home crowd...... =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

gee whats better
5K average home crowds ..... & not getting near a final in the next 5 years
or
the Raiders figures ..

marcus the ****

ahhh Dave, comparing your homeland team to the newest and last placed AFL expansion team......

And while we're at it, claiming the Giants fudge their crowd is fine, but then be prepared for some back. Even most NRL fans believe the Raiders inflate their crowds, yet can still only claim 10k!

I didn;'t start the comparisons .... you flogball halfwits did
this thread has nothing to do with the Raiders .... it was you shirt lifters who brought them into it

got it ?

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

gee whats better
5K average home crowds ..... & not getting near a final in the next 5 years
or
the Raiders figures ..

marcus the ****

ahhh Dave, comparing your homeland team to the newest and last placed AFL expansion team......

And while we're at it, claiming the Giants fudge their crowd is fine, but then be prepared for some back. Even most NRL fans believe the Raiders inflate their crowds, yet can still only claim 10k!

I didn;'t start the comparisons .... you flogball halfwits did
this thread has nothing to do with the Raiders .... it was you shirt lifters who brought them into it

got it ?

your comments are being challenged Dave. Got a problem with that? I suppose you would given you speak shite constantly..

You know your team's shit when you have to compare it to a brand new team in a non heartland area who only won a couple of games and got the wooden spoon. While the Raiders made the finals ffs!

Stewie wrote:

You know your team's shit when you have to compare it to a brand new team in a non heartland area who only won a couple of games and got the wooden spoon. While the Raiders made the finals ffs!

you also know your teams shit ..... when every other club in your comp .. wants you gone Port Tankelaide
in favour of a team of bumbling ********* the Midgets

bogans from the slums .... not wanted !!

wow

another prediction from RD , thats looks like its not gunna be too far off the mark

a real battle royale for the bigger crowds in 2013 between

the Izzyless Midgets
& the Wanderers ..... Womens team

Raiderdave wrote:

wow

another prediction from RD , thats looks like its not gunna be too far off the mark

a real battle royale for the bigger crowds in 2013 between

the Izzyless Midgets
& the Wanderers ..... Womens team

the raiders would be worried!

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

wow

another prediction from RD , thats looks like its not gunna be too far off the mark

a real battle royale for the bigger crowds in 2013 between

the Izzyless Midgets
& the Wanderers ..... Womens team

the raiders would be worried!

>

ahhh........ Canberra is in western sydney now is it ?
when did that happen

marcus the **** seriously is he on a bong ?

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

wow

another prediction from RD , thats looks like its not gunna be too far off the mark

a real battle royale for the bigger crowds in 2013 between

the Izzyless Midgets
& the Wanderers ..... Womens team

the raiders would be worried!

>

ahhh........ Canberra is in western sydney now is it ?
when did that happen

marcus the **** seriously is he on a bong ?

Since when did one team only compete with teams in its region? The giants will be challenging the raiders for following sooner than later. But that's hardly an achievement.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

the raiders would be worried!

>

ahhh........ Canberra is in western sydney now is it ?
when did that happen

marcus the **** seriously is he on a bong ?

Since when did one team only compete with teams in its region? The giants will be challenging the raiders for following sooner than later. But that's hardly an achievement.

heres a tip
read the thread title
then read what I posted

then give yrself a few uppercuts

K

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

>

ahhh........ Canberra is in western sydney now is it ?
when did that happen

marcus the **** seriously is he on a bong ?

Since when did one team only compete with teams in its region? The giants will be challenging the raiders for following sooner than later. But that's hardly an achievement.

heres a tip
read the thread title
then read what I posted

then give yrself a few uppercuts

K

I know the title. I also know youre having a go at a bottom placed new expansion side that isnt that far behind your own side in RL heartland!

What Raid said, X. Canberra is irrelevant.