piesman2011 wrote:I have never liked the term participation it is a dodgy figure (not statistically but by suggesting that these figures are people who are playing AR for at least a season) that makes it hard to determine how many people play the sport week in and week out.
There nothing wrong with the term particiaption if the criteria are stated.
The problem arises with confusion of the terms which mean different things to different people.
There are Auskick clinics, Auskick games and Auskick programs.
What is called Auskick in Victoria is known as "modified rules" in other states.
Then there is "open" or "premiership" football and then senior football.
piesman2011 wrote:I would much prefer to see a breakdown of these participation figures into club numbers and auskick numbers at the very least. That would give us a better indication of the number of people who play the sport for at least a season rathing then because their parents making them do a 6 week fitness course.
That would be just as misleading in places where club structures are almost impossible to build from scratch (Sydney) and the mantle of organised competition is taken up by schools.
But if the participation figures were clearly itemised then we could glean a lot more.
A percentage of players attending Auskick clinics could be expected to attend an Auskick Program.
A percentage of players attending Auskick programs could be expected to attend junior competitions.
A percentage of players attending junior competitions could be expected to attend teenage competitions.
A percentage of players attending teenage competitions could be expected to attend senior competitions.
A percentage of players at each level could be expected to show an interest elite competitions by attending games or watching TV.
.
Nice try Cos.
