Page 2 of 9

Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet

Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:46 pm
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:
Dumbarse points i said. Comon Xmouse be a man so i can call you by your real nic. :)
take it or leave it.

You know as well as I do the Suns, GWS or Lions cannot win this bet. The suns and giants arent good enough yet, and the Lions have drawn the 3 teams you've excluded plus 3 top teams at home in the next 8 weeks.

My terms stand....

Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet

Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:58 pm
by King-Eliagh
You're the one who stated these teams arent basketcases/tankers. Anyhow I'll take the month avatar bet and see you come round 12. :D

Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 5:40 pm
by King-Eliagh
For recording purposes we have agreed the bet stands as the Western bulldogs, brissy lions, GWS, Gold Coast, and Melbourne will all not win two games against an opponent other than themselves (in other words other than against other basketcases/tanksters) by Round 12 of the AFL comp.

The wager of the bet has been agreed as a 1 month avatar bet. The winner having free choice of the losers avatar for this said period.

This has clearly been agreed upon (however if Xman loses we know there's a very high chance his smarty size nuts will shrink to 'hundreds and thousands' effectively reducing his testosterone levels to that of a female mouse foetus making him squirm out of honouring himself and the bet he has agreed to).

How you feeling there Xman? :D

Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 5:45 pm
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:
For recording purposes we have agreed the bet stands as the Western bulldogs, brissy lions, GWS, Gold Coast, and Melbourne will all not win two games against an opponent other than themselves (in other words other than against other basketcases/tanksters) by Round 12 of the AFL comp.

The wager of the bet has been agreed as a 1 month avatar bet. The winner having free choice of the losers avatar for this said period.

This has clearly been agreed upon (however if Xman loses we know there's a very high chance his smarty size nuts will shrink to 'hundreds and thousands' effectively reducing his testosterone levels to that of a female mouse foetus making him squirm out of honouring himself and the bet he has agreed to).

How you feeling there Xman? :D
Fine. Between those 5 teams I'm sure they'll manage to get at least 2 wins against high teams. After all I'm sure the lions can win one and the bulldogs another. :wink:

Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 5:50 pm
by King-Eliagh
No no that's not quite what I had in mind and expressed earlier in another thread which you responded too. Now quickly eat some beef or something as your testicles appear to be shrinking.

I said that to be considered competitive a team surely should win 2 games against another opposition that is not another uncompetitive tankster. Therefore any of the teams mentioned must themselves win 2 games against teams which have not been listed in the bet. Now I'm sure you knew this Xman but please feel free (or not) to highlight your fears and belief that these teams are in fact uncompetitive by trying to weasel out of the bet. We will already know where you stand in terms of manhood if you do.

Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 5:57 pm
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:
No no that's not quite what I had in mind and expressed earlier in another thread which you responded too. Now quickly eat some beef or something as your testicles appear to be shrinking.

I said that to be considered competitive a team surely should win 2 games against another opposition that is not another uncompetitive tankster. Therefore any of the teams mentioned must themselves win 2 games against teams which have not been listed in the bet. Now I'm sure you knew this Xman but please feel free (or not) to highlight your fears and belief that these teams are in fact uncompetitive by trying to weasel out of the bet. We will already know where you stand in terms of manhood if you do.
Please show where you specified that the wins must come from the same team..................... :\:

Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 6:21 pm
by King-Eliagh
King-Eliagh wrote:
Ok Xman I see you chickened out of the last bet... So new bet with same wager is. Brisbane, Melbourne, GWS and GC will get no more than 1 win each against a side other than themselves by mid season. Even uncompetitive teams can have their lucky day in the big league. So essentially I'm saying these teams will be completely uncompetitive apart from **** themselves, with no more than one lucky result going their way each.
King-Eliagh wrote:
Oh i've given a very clear firm definition including exactly how many games each side will win for the first half of the season.

As ive said winning one game in a full half of the season is not my definition of competitive in any competion, nor would it be for any other sports fan or expert.

If you're not willing to bet these teams cant win more than 1 misely game against an opponent in the top (cough) 14 for the entire 1st half of the season then you really dont think much of GC Melb Brissy and GWS now do you Xman? :lol:

Your unwillingness to take this bet on says all i need to know xman! :lol:
Xman wrote:
I'll definitely bet either the demons or lions will win 2 games against teams above them by round 12. :wink:
Please take the time to note the bolded sentences and in particular the italicised bold words within those sentences.

There's your specification Xman. Clear as crystal. Now please, for my amusement, shame yourself in front of us some more by trying to weasle out of it. :lol:

Yes I am your King Xman. And you are my jester. I laugh at your pathetic persona, but as an honourable man, I'm thankful for your entertainment, even though it is at the cost of your dignity. =D> :lol: :D :lol: =D>

Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 6:36 pm
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:
King-Eliagh wrote:
Ok Xman I see you chickened out of the last bet... So new bet with same wager is. Brisbane, Melbourne, GWS and GC will get no more than 1 win each against a side other than themselves by mid season. Even uncompetitive teams can have their lucky day in the big league. So essentially I'm saying these teams will be completely uncompetitive apart from **** themselves, with no more than one lucky result going their way each.
King-Eliagh wrote:
Oh i've given a very clear firm definition including exactly how many games each side will win for the first half of the season.

As ive said winning one game in a full half of the season is not my definition of competitive in any competion, nor would it be for any other sports fan or expert.

If you're not willing to bet these teams cant win more than 1 misely game against an opponent in the top (cough) 14 for the entire 1st half of the season then you really dont think much of GC Melb Brissy and GWS now do you Xman? :lol:

Your unwillingness to take this bet on says all i need to know xman! :lol:
Xman wrote:
I'll definitely bet either the demons or lions will win 2 games against teams above them by round 12. :wink:
Please take the time to note the bolded sentences and in particular the italicised bold words within those sentences.

There's your specification Xman. Clear as crystal. Now please, for my amusement, shame yourself in front of us some more by trying to weasle out of it. :lol:

Yes I am your King Xman. And you are my jester. I laugh at your pathetic persona, but as an honourable man, I'm thankful for your entertainment, even though it is at the cost of your dignity. =D> :lol: :D :lol: =D>
Haha :lol:

Had you sprawling like a little girl! :\:

That's was fun! :D

Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 6:42 pm
by King-Eliagh
Ahhhh yeah good one bumbreath. Lets look at the facts. Once again, I'm right, you're wrong. :wink:

Now will you please give us your final finale and announce you're backing out of this bet, as we know you will. :wink:

Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 6:44 pm
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:
Ahhhh yeah good one bumbreath. Lets look at the facts. Once again, I'm right, you're wrong. :wink:

Now will you please give us your final finale and announce you're backing out of this bet, as we know you will. :wink:
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Watching you panic was worth it? :lol:

Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 6:45 pm
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:
Ahhhh yeah good one bumbreath. Lets look at the facts. Once again, I'm right, you're wrong. :wink:

Now will you please give us your final finale and announce you're backing out of this bet, as we know you will. :wink:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Watching you panic was worth it! :lol:

Nah, I'm in the bet, I don't back out.

Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 6:47 pm
by King-Eliagh
Ah littlest littlest bitch, I'll believe that the day after you've worn the avatar of my choice for a month.

Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet

Posted: Sun May 06, 2012 4:46 pm
by King-Eliagh
G'day folks. :wave:

Well round 6 is all but over and out basketcase/tankster sides have all completed their games. This week we had the GC and western bulldogs playing ok...but losing against their opponents as per usual. We also had three complete blowouts as is expected with these basketcase/tankster sides with Brissie, Melb and GWS copping absolute thumpings!

So at the end of round six these uncompetitive teams are continuing in the manner KE has predicted with not one of the teams having yet scored a win against an opponent not listed by KE as a basketcase/tankster.

So the official scoreboard in this bet looks thusly

Brisbane --- 0
GWS --- 0
Western Bulldogs --- 0
Gold Coast --- 0
Melb --- annnnnd 0

:D

Yes folks proof that there's still 5 teams who just arent competitive in the AFL comp and really dont deserve to be there as they continue to produce complete dead rubber matches. Unfortunately the results in their games are obvious to all prior to the first bounce. And unfortunately for Xman, KE's prediction looks to be right on the money! :D

Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet

Posted: Sun May 06, 2012 5:57 pm
by Beaussie
You idiot KE, the Suns were very unlucky not to win last night. You're going to lose this bet.

Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet

Posted: Sun May 06, 2012 5:57 pm
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:
G'day folks. :wave:

Well round 6 is all but over and out basketcase/tankster sides have all completed their games. This week we had the GC and western bulldogs playing ok...but losing against their opponents as per usual. We also had three complete blowouts as is expected with these basketcase/tankster sides with Brissie, Melb and GWS copping absolute thumpings!

So at the end of round six these uncompetitive teams are continuing in the manner KE has predicted with not one of the teams having yet scored a win against an opponent not listed by KE as a basketcase/tankster.

So the official scoreboard in this bet looks thusly

Brisbane --- 0
GWS --- 0
Western Bulldogs --- 0
Gold Coast --- 0
Melb --- annnnnd 0

:D

Yes folks proof that there's still 5 teams who just arent competitive in the AFL comp and really dont deserve to be there as they continue to produce complete dead rubber matches. Unfortunately the results in their games are obvious to all prior to the first bounce. And unfortunately for Xman, KE's prediction looks to be right on the money! :D
Dribble. The suns were unlucky to lose. The bulldogs almost beat collingwood. Melbourne played well against the cats.