Talking Footy

cos789 wrote:

Xman wrote:

I would say that is across Australia.

I agree. No adjective like "widely" or "comprehensively" was used.

And the number one dumbarse enters.

'Across' Australia is as clear as it gets.

Here's number 1 and 2 dictionary definitions for you lot who had poor English teachers.

1: in a position reaching from one side to the other : crosswise
2: to or on the opposite side

NSW must prove Marngrook was played 'across' Australia or accept the inevitable, a fat steamin stinkin BS smeared across his username, by me, his nemesis.

cos789 wrote:

Xman wrote:

I would say that is across Australia.

I agree. No adjective like "widely" or "comprehensively" was used.

Thank you!

NSWAFL wrote:

cos789 wrote:

Xman wrote:

I would say that is across Australia.

I agree. No adjective like "widely" or "comprehensively" was used.

Thank you!

Is that all you got?

Oh dear, this one's over early Xman. There's little doubt nsw is done and dusted, he's got nothing more to contribute on this one.

By the way is this a record quickest ever won BS challenge?

And do I possibly receive a Bestest and Smartest point in this one? I know Beaussie seems to get em when he does good. I did good too :D

King-Eliagh wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

cos789 wrote:

I agree. No adjective like "widely" or "comprehensively" was used.

Thank you!

Is that all you got?

Oh dear, this one's over early Xman. There's little doubt nsw is done and dusted, he's got nothing more to contribute on this one.

By the way is this a record quickest ever won BS challenge?

Yep, bs to KE. I bellieve the criteria is set by the challenged and his definition of "across".

Oh this is getting really pathetic.

NSW showed no indication that his definition of across, when talking about australia was confined to a small region in the southeast corner of Australia.

Again the dictionary definition of across

1: in a position reaching from one side to the other : crosswise
2: to or on the opposite side

Last I looked the country of Austalia "reaches from" perth to Sydney and Darwin and Adelaide are "on the opposite side" of the country.

NSW provide me with the evidence that Markgrook was played across Australia. So far you've got evidence for only a small region in the southeastern corner. Back up your claim, or, if you cant back on out of here take the BS point and fight another day.

King-Eliagh wrote:

NSW showed no indication that his definition of across, when talking about australia was confined to a small region in the southeast corner of Australia.

Quite correct. He showed no indication because that's not what he said

King-Eliagh wrote:

Oh this is getting really pathetic.

yep. So why do you KE conitue to be so pathetic ?

Cos I've given you a bath in two separate threads now. I think its time for beddy byes for you eh?

BTW your post above? Thanks for the first part, it supports my argument. The second part resembles a 9 year old copycatting to try and make a point.

Beddy byes cos, now!

KE FITH

Typical of a loser, Cos. That's Dunce in a nutshell. All I needed to show was a wide range and I did.

Ahh you said "across Australia" nsw. not in a "wide range".

A simple case this one but just to educate you some more I'll soon provide further clear evidence indicating that Marngrook was not played across Australia prior to Captain Cooks arrival :D

It is quite obvious parafeel quoted participants as anybody that went within 10 miles of a steedan in the PNG and so far XMan has accepted this definition even though logic says the accepted definition is registered players.

NSWAF's definition is the definition. if I understand the bs rules of the bs club.

What are you on about cos? What does png have to do with this thread? Get with it man!

NSW's definition is "across". Thats the defining word he used in his claim. Jeez you're a dumby dumby cos.

parafeel's definition of participation is nothing like the standard definition.
your definition of "across" isvery narrow.
NSWFL's definition of "across" is acceptable.
The context is NSWFL's I believe.

cos789 wrote:

parafeel's definition of participation is nothing like the standard definition.
your definition of "across" isvery narrow.
NSWFL's definition of "across" is acceptable.
The context is NSWFL's I believe.

You're an idiot

So ahh nsw tell me, was your definition of "across australia" more like 1/15th across australia? If it was too bad, you should have explained this in the context of your thread. Everyone knows that simply put the definition of across means from one side to the other. Therefore lil nsw needs to prove that Marngrook was played from sydney to perth or adelaide to darwin etc.

I'm still waiting nsw, the disruptions from an imbecile are doing nothing for your cause. Please provide some proof.