Talking Footy

NSWAFL wrote:

Most likely it was an opinion article based on nothing more than a biased stuck up pile of dung and not a shred of truth to it on a slow news day.

The article never existed to start with. Just more BS from Raider and KE. It's beyond pathetic.

Just throwing the possibility out there, Beaussie.

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

I agree nsw, it was light hearted as most mX articles are as i suggested earlier. It was light reading and meant to be funny but someone conducted the research and found a few thousand people to participate. Probably online folk. and thats the result they came up with. Thing is I only vouched for the studies legitimacy, I never said it was 100% accurate.

You claimed there was a study showing.......

Find it or you get a bs point.

I claimed I read a study showing ...

so is this the precedent? we cannot state we read something which cannot be located on the net and therefore cannot prove on here? I certainly hope you're consistent then Xman.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

I agree nsw, it was light hearted as most mX articles are as i suggested earlier. It was light reading and meant to be funny but someone conducted the research and found a few thousand people to participate. Probably online folk. and thats the result they came up with. Thing is I only vouched for the studies legitimacy, I never said it was 100% accurate.

You claimed there was a study showing.......

Find it or you get a bs point.

I claimed I read a study showing ...

so is this the precedent? we cannot state we read something which cannot be located on the net and therefore cannot prove on here? I certainly hope you're consistent then Xman.

If you claimed you read an article you are claiming the article exists, because you cannot read an article that doesn't exist. Find the article and show us or you get a BS point for trying to score points with utter BS.

the article is not available on the net. Xman please, i dont deserve a BS point please dont do this to me. I read it i promise.

King-Eliagh wrote:

the article is not available on the net. Xman please, i dont deserve a BS point please dont do this to me. I read it i promise.

Stop the BS. The article either exists or it doesn't. You don't go making up BS claims without a source to back it up. Either show us the source or a BS point for you is the only option available to Xman I would have thought.

But its impossible to prove beaussie, thus Xman shouldnt have put it up as a file.

King-Eliagh wrote:

the article is not available on the net. Xman please, i dont deserve a BS point please dont do this to me. I read it i promise.

you should have qualified this in your original claim.

When people make claims on this forum they are either expected to support it with proof (when asked) or qualify their claim as their opinion only.

Your claim therefore should have been worded something like "I cannot prove it because the article is not available in electronic form, but I remember reading....."

but but it was an honest mistake, this clause wasnt typed into the BS rules Xman. you gotta believe me, i wont do it again. [-o<

King-Eliagh wrote:

but but it was an honest mistake, this clause wasnt typed into the BS rules Xman. you gotta believe me, i wont do it again. [-o<

Too late dumbarse.

King-Eliagh wrote:

but but it was an honest mistake, this clause wasnt typed into the BS rules Xman. you gotta believe me, i wont do it again. [-o<

You boldly swanked into a claim of Raiderdave's that was utter BS. That was your mistake. You deserve your impending reward, unless you find proof to the contrary of course.

Ah I love it when karma hits!

Xman, what happened to us? We used to be colleagues maaan. you dont remember when we used to hang together talking about adjudication? Now look at you! You're a cold hearted corrupt beast. You've changed man.

Anyway on a brighter note i read the article and it dumped on all you guys real bad, and it was read by perhaps a million commuters. Australia knows who the dumbest sports supporters are in this country.

Just look at my signature for crying out loud. That was an AFL fan also.

But I concede, who am I kidding, I'm not beaussie, I cant just back out of a challenge and have the rules changed for me. Xman I cant get the proof, so slap dat BS point on me.