The article never existed to start with. Just more BS from Raider and KE. It's beyond pathetic.NSWAFL wrote:Most likely it was an opinion article based on nothing more than a biased stuck up pile of dung and not a shred of truth to it on a slow news day.
BS file claim#19: a study showed AFL fans were the least int
- Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9681
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
Re: BS file claim#19: a study showed AFL fans were the least
Re: BS file claim#19: a study showed AFL fans were the least
Just throwing the possibility out there, Beaussie.
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: BS file claim#19: a study showed AFL fans were the least
I claimed I read a study showing ...Xman wrote:You claimed there was a study showing.......King-Eliagh wrote:I agree nsw, it was light hearted as most mX articles are as i suggested earlier. It was light reading and meant to be funny but someone conducted the research and found a few thousand people to participate. Probably online folk. and thats the result they came up with. Thing is I only vouched for the studies legitimacy, I never said it was 100% accurate.
Find it or you get a bs point.
so is this the precedent? we cannot state we read something which cannot be located on the net and therefore cannot prove on here? I certainly hope you're consistent then Xman.

xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Re: BS file claim#19: a study showed AFL fans were the least
If you claimed you read an article you are claiming the article exists, because you cannot read an article that doesn't exist.King-Eliagh wrote:I claimed I read a study showing ...Xman wrote:You claimed there was a study showing.......King-Eliagh wrote:I agree nsw, it was light hearted as most mX articles are as i suggested earlier. It was light reading and meant to be funny but someone conducted the research and found a few thousand people to participate. Probably online folk. and thats the result they came up with. Thing is I only vouched for the studies legitimacy, I never said it was 100% accurate.
Find it or you get a bs point.
so is this the precedent? we cannot state we read something which cannot be located on the net and therefore cannot prove on here? I certainly hope you're consistent then Xman.

King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: BS file claim#19: a study showed AFL fans were the least
the article is not available on the net. Xman please, i dont deserve a BS point
please dont do this to me. I read it i promise.



xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
- Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9681
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
Re: BS file claim#19: a study showed AFL fans were the least
Stop the BS. The article either exists or it doesn't. You don't go making up BS claims without a source to back it up. Either show us the source or a BS point for you is the only option available to Xman I would have thought.King-Eliagh wrote:the article is not available on the net. Xman please, i dont deserve a BS point![]()
please dont do this to me. I read it i promise.
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: BS file claim#19: a study showed AFL fans were the least
But its impossible to prove beaussie, thus Xman shouldnt have put it up as a file.

xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Re: BS file claim#19: a study showed AFL fans were the least
you should have qualified this in your original claim.King-Eliagh wrote:the article is not available on the net. Xman please, i dont deserve a BS point![]()
please dont do this to me. I read it i promise.
When people make claims on this forum they are either expected to support it with proof (when asked) or qualify their claim as their opinion only.
Your claim therefore should have been worded something like "I cannot prove it because the article is not available in electronic form, but I remember reading....."
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: BS file claim#19: a study showed AFL fans were the least
but but
it was an honest mistake, this clause wasnt typed into the BS rules Xman. you gotta believe me, i wont do it again. [-o<


xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
- Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9681
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
Re: BS file claim#19: a study showed AFL fans were the least
Too late dumbarse.King-Eliagh wrote:but butit was an honest mistake, this clause wasnt typed into the BS rules Xman. you gotta believe me, i wont do it again. [-o<
Re: BS file claim#19: a study showed AFL fans were the least
You boldly swanked into a claim of Raiderdave's that was utter BS. That was your mistake. You deserve your impending reward, unless you find proof to the contrary of course.King-Eliagh wrote:but butit was an honest mistake, this clause wasnt typed into the BS rules Xman. you gotta believe me, i wont do it again. [-o<
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
Re: BS file claim#19: a study showed AFL fans were the least
Ah I love it when karma hits!
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: BS file claim#19: a study showed AFL fans were the least
Xman, what happened to us? We used to be colleagues maaan. you dont remember when we used to hang together talking about adjudication? Now look at you! You're a cold hearted corrupt beast. You've changed man.
Anyway on a brighter note i read the article and it dumped on all you guys real bad, and it was read by perhaps a million commuters. Australia knows who the dumbest sports supporters are in this country.

Anyway on a brighter note i read the article and it dumped on all you guys real bad, and it was read by perhaps a million commuters. Australia knows who the dumbest sports supporters are in this country.


xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: BS file claim#19: a study showed AFL fans were the least


xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: BS file claim#19: a study showed AFL fans were the least
Just look at my signature for crying out loud. That was an AFL fan also.
But I concede, who am I kidding, I'm not beaussie, I cant just back out of a challenge and have the rules changed for me. Xman I cant get the proof, so slap dat BS point on me.

But I concede, who am I kidding, I'm not beaussie, I cant just back out of a challenge and have the rules changed for me. Xman I cant get the proof, so slap dat BS point on me.

xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?