Page 2 of 8

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 6:23 pm
by Raiderdave
cooee wrote:
The Queensland Reds represent the entire state the Broncos don't.
The Lions numbers are bad. They should be embarrassed of their membership total considering how high it was in the past and the fact they draw support from two different cities.

and they're a fad .. & nothng more

like all super rugby franchises
they have their " moments " in the sun at different times
before dissapearing

the Farce used to average 27K ... its now 14K
the Horrotahs .... 33K .. its now 20K
the Brumbies .... 21K ... is now 13K
the rebel ... are at 17K .. but are a rabble ....& just watch their crowds plummet ova the next few years

the Reds will have a good year support wise in 2012 ( the Broncos will still get them average crowd wise ) ... but it won't last
as yawnion is a very poor product ... & as hard as toffballers try... you can't polish a turd

the Broncos are a staple in Brisbane
they'll have their highest membership tally ever in 2012... will have the highest average attendance for about the 5th year in a row in SE Qld .. &
will be watched by more Olders in one game then the Reds or Lions will in 4

transmission ends . :wink:

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 6:29 pm
by NSWAFL
Yeah, transmission ends because the ACMA cut you off for telling more untruths than a f'ing politician!

RU has you by the privates whether you like it or not.

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 6:56 pm
by Raiderdave
NSWAFL wrote:
Yeah, transmission ends because the ACMA cut you off for telling more untruths than a f'ing politician!

RU has you by the privates whether you like it or not.

8-[

:lol: :lol: :lol:

so..... what planet do you live on again ? :-k

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 7:28 pm
by Beaussie
cooee wrote:
The Lions numbers are bad.
Oh dear. FFS, the Lions have more members than the Broncos.

RL heartland :(/ :(/ :(/

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 7:42 pm
by Raiderdave
Beaussie wrote:
cooee wrote:
The Lions numbers are bad.
Oh dear. FFS, the Lions have more members than the Broncos.

RL heartland :(/ :(/ :(/
memberships in 2012
Broncos 20,000
Lions ...?? 17,000

crowds in 2012
Broncos 37,500
Lions ??... 17,000

TV audiences in 2012
Broncos 350,000
Lions ?? 60,000

the Lions ........... are the Broncos bitches :wink:

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 7:51 pm
by Beaussie
You're a proven BS artist. No one takes anything you state or predict seriously dopey.

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 7:59 pm
by NSWAFL
Raiderdave wrote:
NSWAFL wrote:
Yeah, transmission ends because the ACMA cut you off for telling more untruths than a f'ing politician!

RU has you by the privates whether you like it or not.

8-[

:lol: :lol: :lol:

so..... what planet do you live on again ? :-k

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Planet Earth. :roll:

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:44 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Beaussie wrote:
cooee wrote:
Also that Broncos total is from the beginning of the week. Come Monday the Lions will be in last place.
Yeah whatever. :roll:

Still avoiding the elephant in the room.

Reds are smashing the Broncos. Smashing I tell ya, in supposed RL heartland too. :_<> :_<> :_<>

Remember getting your arse handed to you about the Reds and Broncos crowd average :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:46 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Beaussie wrote:
cooee wrote:
I'd be more worried about the Lions.
Why? Still more members than the Broncos despite an awful on field performance last season. What's the Broncos excuse for being well behind the Reds and Lions in membership numbers? In so called RL heartland too. :(/ :(/ :(/

Oh and don't give us that rubbish about memberships being new to RL fans. Membership is a new concept for RU fans too, yet hasn't stopped the Reds gathering huge membership numbers.

This is all you have to worry about.

Broncos 33,209
Brions 20,462


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:56 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
This ones for you Bea.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=2776

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 9:48 pm
by NSWAFL
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
cooee wrote:
I'd be more worried about the Lions.
Why? Still more members than the Broncos despite an awful on field performance last season. What's the Broncos excuse for being well behind the Reds and Lions in membership numbers? In so called RL heartland too. :(/ :(/ :(/

Oh and don't give us that rubbish about memberships being new to RL fans. Membership is a new concept for RU fans too, yet hasn't stopped the Reds gathering huge membership numbers.

This is all you have to worry about.

Broncos 33,209
Brions 20,462


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Suggest you start worrying about the Reds who are a lot closer to the Broncos!

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 9:56 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Why, not my farking team.

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 9:59 pm
by cooee
Why would the Broncos need to worry? Their crowds aren't dropping like the Lions.

Parra what word is blocked in your sig?

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:05 pm
by NSWAFL
The Broncos need to worry about the REDS is what I said, Cooee! Read my post next time.

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:06 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Vic*a*d cooee. Sensitive bunch around here.