Re: NRL Tells Ch 9 to
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 7:54 pm


Melbourne has a large kiwi population, probably more than follow the storm.cooee wrote:Beaussie wrote:And 368,000 and 405,000 watched the AFL GF in Sydney in 2010. AFL is more popular in Sydney than RL is in Melbourne obviously eh.Raiderdave wrote:325K watched our GF in Melbourne
http://www.talkingfooty.com/tv_ratings_2010.php
What about the results for 2011?
258,000 for the AFL GF in Sydney.
347,000 for the NRL GF in Melbourne.
http://www.talkingfooty.com/tv_ratings_2011.php
IndeedXman wrote:Melbourne has a large kiwi population, probably more than follow the storm.
What time will the NRL be broadcast in most parts of Australia? Cricket or NRL on Channel 9 and what time?ParraEelsNRL wrote:Say hello to Gem CA.
132 millionNSWAFL wrote:Nationwide the AFL is winning.
but but but .........Xman wrote:Melbourne has a large kiwi population, probably more than follow the storm.cooee wrote:Beaussie wrote:And 368,000 and 405,000 watched the AFL GF in Sydney in 2010. AFL is more popular in Sydney than RL is in Melbourne obviously eh.
http://www.talkingfooty.com/tv_ratings_2010.php
What about the results for 2011?
258,000 for the AFL GF in Sydney.
347,000 for the NRL GF in Melbourne.
http://www.talkingfooty.com/tv_ratings_2011.php
you mean to the near 13 Million Australians you live in the parts they will broadcast toBeaussie wrote:What time will the NRL be broadcast in most parts of Australia? Cricket or NRL on Channel 9 and what time?ParraEelsNRL wrote:Say hello to Gem CA.
Those figures are wrong.Raiderdave wrote:132 millionNSWAFL wrote:Nationwide the AFL is winning.
to 120 million
says different ......
NSWAFL wrote:Those figures are wrong.Raiderdave wrote:132 millionNSWAFL wrote:Nationwide the AFL is winning.
to 120 million
says different ......
nothing ?NSWAFL wrote:AFL won.