Page 2 of 3

Re: Raiderdave's BS file failures

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 3:30 pm
by King-Eliagh
He's also proven the national nrl tv ratings outrate the AFL tv ratings in here. He uses credible stats and compiles them in a more objective way than beaussie does here on this site.

Re: Raiderdave's BS file failures

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 3:34 pm
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:
He's also proven the national nrl tv ratings outrate the AFL tv ratings in here. He uses credible stats and compiles them in a more objective way than beaussie does here on this site.
Firstly this wasn't a bs claim. Secondly I've asked for a link multiple times and none has been forthcoming. Thirdly, these cumulative figures are not national because they don't sample all areas.

Re: Raiderdave's BS file failures

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 3:36 pm
by Raiderdave
King-Eliagh wrote:
He's also proven the national nrl tv ratings outrate the AFL tv ratings in here. He uses credible stats and compiles them in a more objective way than beaussie does here on this site.
exactly E

I go to an indepedant source for the REAL figures

Bearsy says he gets his figures from a similar source
but I caught him out badly several times last year .. fudging it up 8-[

he cannot be trusted

the NRL handed the AFL its goolies in 2011 & has done so for the last 3 years
Rugby League has had the biggest rating game of football in Aust ... & 4 out of the top 5 ( it was 7 in the top 10 in 2011) every year
since 2005
suggestions of anything else ... belong in the BS file :wink:

Re: Raiderdave's BS file failures

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 3:37 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
King-Eliagh wrote:
He's also proven the national nrl tv ratings outrate the AFL tv ratings in here. He uses credible stats and compiles them in a more objective way than beaussie does here on this site.
Firstly this wasn't a bs claim. Secondly I've asked for a link multiple times and none has been forthcoming. Thirdly, these cumulative figures are not national because they don't sample all areas.


BS
BS

& ah

BS

:wink:

Re: Raiderdave's BS file failures

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 3:40 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
King-Eliagh wrote:
He's also proven the national nrl tv ratings outrate the AFL tv ratings in here. He uses credible stats and compiles them in a more objective way than beaussie does here on this site.
exactly E

I go to an indepedant source for the REAL figures

Bearsy says he gets his figures from a similar source
but I caught him out badly several times last year .. fudging it up 8-[

he cannot be trusted

the NRL handed the AFL its goolies in 2011 & has done so for the last 3 years
Rugby League has had the biggest rating game of football in Aust ... & 4 out of the top 5 ( it was 7 in the top 10 in 2011) every year
since 2005
suggestions of anything else ... belong in the BS file :wink:
Link it then! Link or it's bs

Re: Raiderdave's BS file failures

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 3:45 pm
by King-Eliagh
Yep those of us with a brain bigger than a peanut know beaussies obvious attempts at subtely corrupting figures to go his way. He's pretty creative but gets caught out as often as not imo.

And Xman, enough! You may have been given global mod status, but we dont need to follow your corrupted rules. Raiders provided proof on this stuff countless times before and whether he chooses to link it or not does not define whether it is bs or not.

Re: Raiderdave's BS file failures

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 3:57 pm
by NSWAFL
Raiderdave wrote:
I go to an indepedant source for the REAL figures
Which are full of holes and therefore completely unreliable.

Re: Raiderdave's BS file failures

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 4:14 pm
by King-Eliagh
Aologise for your sins nsw!

Re: Raiderdave's BS file failures

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 4:16 pm
by Raiderdave
NSWAFL wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
I go to an indepedant source for the REAL figures
Which are full of holes and therefore completely unreliable.

8-[


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

oh dear

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Raiderdave's BS file failures

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 5:02 pm
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:
Yep those of us with a brain bigger than a peanut know beaussies obvious attempts at subtely corrupting figures to go his way. He's pretty creative but gets caught out as often as not imo.

And Xman, enough! You may have been given global mod status, but we dont need to follow your corrupted rules. Raiders provided proof on this stuff countless times before and whether he chooses to link it or not does not define whether it is bs or not.
I haven't seen one Independant link for these cumulative figures. Until I do they are bs.

The regional figures are extremely questionable. Last years AFL GF rated over 900k for about 30% of the 5 city figure. Yet some of the finals had regional ratings of less than 10% of the 5 city ratings. Absolute rubbish. Imagine adding these inaccuracies over an entire year! :roll:

The only figure of any importance is the $$$$ it provides the network which is directly related to the value the product provides to the network. 1.25b says it all.

Re: Raiderdave's BS file failures

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 5:45 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
King-Eliagh wrote:
Yep those of us with a brain bigger than a peanut know beaussies obvious attempts at subtely corrupting figures to go his way. He's pretty creative but gets caught out as often as not imo.

And Xman, enough! You may have been given global mod status, but we dont need to follow your corrupted rules. Raiders provided proof on this stuff countless times before and whether he chooses to link it or not does not define whether it is bs or not.
I haven't seen one Independant link for these cumulative figures. Until I do they are bs.

The regional figures are extremely questionable. Last years AFL GF rated over 900k for about 30% of the 5 city figure. Yet some of the finals had regional ratings of less than 10% of the 5 city ratings. Absolute rubbish. Imagine adding these inaccuracies over an entire year! :roll:

The only figure of any importance is the $$$$ it provides the network which is directly related to the value the product provides to the network. 1.25b says it all.

but but but .............. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

whopped like a bitch was the AFL.... by the NRL
& it'll have the sh.it kicked out of it again this year

stop your whining
its getting embarrasing

oh & PS
your deal is 1.1 Billion ATM after the court decision lst week
:wink:

Re: Raiderdave's BS file failures

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 5:50 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
King-Eliagh wrote:
Yep those of us with a brain bigger than a peanut know beaussies obvious attempts at subtely corrupting figures to go his way. He's pretty creative but gets caught out as often as not imo.

And Xman, enough! You may have been given global mod status, but we dont need to follow your corrupted rules. Raiders provided proof on this stuff countless times before and whether he chooses to link it or not does not define whether it is bs or not.
I haven't seen one Independant link for these cumulative figures. Until I do they are bs.

The regional figures are extremely questionable. Last years AFL GF rated over 900k for about 30% of the 5 city figure. Yet some of the finals had regional ratings of less than 10% of the 5 city ratings. Absolute rubbish. Imagine adding these inaccuracies over an entire year! :roll:

The only figure of any importance is the $$$$ it provides the network which is directly related to the value the product provides to the network. 1.25b says it all.

but but but .............. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

whopped like a bitch was the AFL.... by the NRL
& it'll have the sh.it kicked out of it again this year

stop your whining
its getting embarrasing

oh & PS
your deal is 1.1 Billion ATM after the court decision lst week
:wink:
Link please.

Give it up for this year. The AFL will win even the lopsided cumulative figures now more games are on TV and live in to Perth and Adelaide for the first time. For too long the AFL has only shown 4.5 games to all markets, while the NRL has had 7. The AFL will go up to nearly 7 now, and combined with its 50% longer running time and more natural ad breaks the NRL will be lucky to get 800k. Probably less now the Internet rights are gone. :lol:

Re: Raiderdave's BS file failures

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 6:22 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
I haven't seen one Independant link for these cumulative figures. Until I do they are bs.

The regional figures are extremely questionable. Last years AFL GF rated over 900k for about 30% of the 5 city figure. Yet some of the finals had regional ratings of less than 10% of the 5 city ratings. Absolute rubbish. Imagine adding these inaccuracies over an entire year! :roll:

The only figure of any importance is the $$$$ it provides the network which is directly related to the value the product provides to the network. 1.25b says it all.

but but but .............. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

whopped like a bitch was the AFL.... by the NRL
& it'll have the sh.it kicked out of it again this year

stop your whining
its getting embarrasing

oh & PS
your deal is 1.1 Billion ATM after the court decision lst week
:wink:
Link please.

Give it up for this year. The AFL will win even the lopsided cumulative figures now more games are on TV and live in to Perth and Adelaide for the first time. For too long the AFL has only shown 4.5 games to all markets, while the NRL has had 7. The AFL will go up to nearly 7 now, and combined with its 50% longer running time and more natural ad breaks the NRL will be lucky to get 800k. Probably less now the Internet rights are gone. :lol:

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

a hard lesson will be learnt this year by singletball fans

when they are stomped on from a great height again this year
what excuses then ?
what but but butting will they conjure up to hide their codes numerous inadequeces this time ?

I look forward to tormenting the F out of them all year long
& when our rights deal is annouced

I'd get the fark outta here for a month or so
as the bitch slapping that will be rendered to fumbleballers in here ... will not be a pretty sight 8-[

can't wait :wink:

Re: Raiderdave's BS file failures

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 6:23 pm
by NSWAFL
Basketball has always been struggling, Dave. Why change the subject all of a sudden?

Re: Raiderdave's BS file failures

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 6:27 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:

but but but .............. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

whopped like a bitch was the AFL.... by the NRL
& it'll have the sh.it kicked out of it again this year

stop your whining
its getting embarrasing

oh & PS
your deal is 1.1 Billion ATM after the court decision lst week
:wink:
Link please.

Give it up for this year. The AFL will win even the lopsided cumulative figures now more games are on TV and live in to Perth and Adelaide for the first time. For too long the AFL has only shown 4.5 games to all markets, while the NRL has had 7. The AFL will go up to nearly 7 now, and combined with its 50% longer running time and more natural ad breaks the NRL will be lucky to get 800k. Probably less now the Internet rights are gone. :lol:

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

a hard lesson will be learnt this year by singletball fans

when they are stomped on from a great height again this year
what excuses then ?
what but but butting will they conjure up to hide their codes numerous inadequeces this time ?

I look forward to tormenting the F out of them all year long
& when our rights deal is annouced

I'd get the fark outta here for a month or so
as the bitch slapping that will be rendered to fumbleballers in here ... will not be a pretty sight 8-[

can't wait :wink:
4 games in every state, live. All games livE on fox. And the nRL? 3 FTA games in 2 states! LOL