So confirmation that Union has higher average attendances than League in the ACT and VIC. That's a good start.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Hey, when I called BS file, I made sure I said the Broncos, I couldn't give a stuff about the other 2

So confirmation that Union has higher average attendances than League in the ACT and VIC. That's a good start.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Hey, when I called BS file, I made sure I said the Broncos, I couldn't give a stuff about the other 2
Ah, hang on. That is YOUR context, not Beaussies. You made the challenge without mentioning the Broncos. Therefore the RU average just needs to be higher than the NRl average crowd in QLD. Beaussie never made a claim about the Broncos specifically.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Hey, when I called BS file, I made sure I said the Broncos, I couldn't give a stuff about the other 2
You beat me to it. I was going to say just that after re-reading Parra's post.Xman wrote:Ah, hang on. That is YOUR context, not Beaussies. You made the challenge without mentioning the Broncos. Therefore the RU average just needs to be higher than the NRl average crowd in QLD. Beaussie never made a claim about the Broncos specifically.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Hey, when I called BS file, I made sure I said the Broncos, I couldn't give a stuff about the other 2
My apology. I didn't see his sneaky little attempt at scoring an easy point.Beaussie wrote:You beat me to it. I was going to say just that after re-reading Parra's post.Xman wrote:Ah, hang on. That is YOUR context, not Beaussies. You made the challenge without mentioning the Broncos. Therefore the RU average just needs to be higher than the NRl average crowd in QLD. Beaussie never made a claim about the Broncos specifically.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Hey, when I called BS file, I made sure I said the Broncos, I couldn't give a stuff about the other 2
Yes the article, quoting John O'Neill, not me.cooee wrote:The article states Broncos vs Reds.
You also didn't state average. I can provide total cumulative that proves RL is doing better then RU.Beaussie wrote:Yes the article, quoting John O'Neill, not me.cooee wrote:The article states Broncos vs Reds.
Fair go! I was on your side until you started claiming the broncos only.ParraEelsNRL wrote:I'll do the same for the Reds now with and without the finals.
Thanks for coming Bea.
I noticed xman trying to help you out again, tell me, does he spit or swallow?
Xman wrote:Ah, hang on. That is YOUR context, not Beaussies. You made the challenge without mentioning the Broncos. Therefore the RU average just needs to be higher than the NRl average crowd in QLD. Beaussie never made a claim about the Broncos specifically.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Hey, when I called BS file, I made sure I said the Broncos, I couldn't give a stuff about the other 2
That was at Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:52 pmParraEelsNRL wrote:Broncos beat the Reds in QLD, I want a BS file now.
Wrong year for a start dopey.cooee wrote:The reason why John O'Neil thinks the Reds out drew the Broncos is because they included the Round 12 clash against the Sea Eagles at Suncorp which actually was a Sea Eagles home game not Broncos.
http://www.mwse.com.au/default.aspx?s=a ... ble-header
skysport.co.nz, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 7:17 p.m.
While he is happy to side with rugby league in the war against the AFL, O'Neill couldn't resist a dig at the 13-a-side code as he talked up crowd figures from last year's Super Rugby season
http://www.skysport.co.nz/article/rugby ... AFL-52533/