Page 2 of 15

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 6:49 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Haha, I think that last one should become my new sig, what ya reckon skirts?

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 6:51 pm
by Xman
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Sticks and stones make break my bones but ******** will never hurt me.
There's the difference right there. You lot are in to name calling. we just want to discuss the topics!

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 6:52 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Xman wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
I'd let the blood run free and treat TFC as it should be treated.

It's a Zoo, thus it should be ran like a Zoo.

People would only get deleted or warned for obvious racism and sickening posts, the rest would be fair game.
Well the voting so far suggests the majority do not want a LU style free for all where abuse takes precedent over debate.

I'd suggest with the numbers we've seen so far the motion should be carried tonight. Especially since the term seems to be used more than ever today.

Do you think there's likely to be more "no" votes?

Hahaha, yeah yeah, rush it through eh?

Typical dictator move :lol:

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 6:55 pm
by NSWAFL
Typical response for a real skirt.

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 6:55 pm
by Xman
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Xman wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
I'd let the blood run free and treat TFC as it should be treated.

It's a Zoo, thus it should be ran like a Zoo.

People would only get deleted or warned for obvious racism and sickening posts, the rest would be fair game.
Well the voting so far suggests the majority do not want a LU style free for all where abuse takes precedent over debate.

I'd suggest with the numbers we've seen so far the motion should be carried tonight. Especially since the term seems to be used more than ever today.

Do you think there's likely to be more "no" votes?

Hahaha, yeah yeah, rush it through eh?

Typical dictator move :lol:
I did ask you. I'll ask again. Do you think there are likely to be enough additional no votes to change the decision within the next week? Ill trust your judgment. If you do we will wait. If not the decision is formal tonight. I only gave it a week to ensure everyone had a chance to vote. Seems like almost everyone has and any stragglers won't change the final decision.

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 6:58 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Xman wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Sticks and stones make break my bones but ******** will never hurt me.
There's the difference right there. You lot are in to name calling. we just want to discuss the topics!
Oh really?

With such debates like these huh?
LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League

Mungoball

How West was lost

Rugby league is not a sport, it's an atrocity

The Warrior is back in Sydney

NRL cops a kicking in the battle of the codes

3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans

If I was a Native..

Official List of Excuses for Low RL Crowds

Another big rl name to GWS

NRL Fudged Membership Numbers

Does the NRL cause mental health problems?

NRL pins hopes on new variant.

Things with more credibility than the RL world cup

2012 - One year closer to the death of the NRL

268,700 Australian Rules players Rugby League just 91,200

Who is this Lockyer?
These threads made for debate are they?

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 6:59 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Xman wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Sticks and stones make break my bones but ******** will never hurt me.
There's the difference right there. You lot are in to name calling. we just want to discuss the topics!
Oh really?

With such debates like these huh?
LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League

Mungoball

How West was lost

Rugby league is not a sport, it's an atrocity

The Warrior is back in Sydney

NRL cops a kicking in the battle of the codes

3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans

If I was a Native..

Official List of Excuses for Low RL Crowds

Another big rl name to GWS

NRL Fudged Membership Numbers

Does the NRL cause mental health problems?

NRL pins hopes on new variant.

Things with more credibility than the RL world cup

2012 - One year closer to the death of the NRL

268,700 Australian Rules players Rugby League just 91,200

Who is this Lockyer?
These threads made for debate are they?

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 7:00 pm
by Xman
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Xman wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Sticks and stones make break my bones but ******** will never hurt me.
There's the difference right there. You lot are in to name calling. we just want to discuss the topics!
Oh really?

With such debates like these huh?
LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League

Mungoball

How West was lost

Rugby league is not a sport, it's an atrocity

The Warrior is back in Sydney

NRL cops a kicking in the battle of the codes

3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans

If I was a Native..

Official List of Excuses for Low RL Crowds

Another big rl name to GWS

NRL Fudged Membership Numbers

Does the NRL cause mental health problems?

NRL pins hopes on new variant.

Things with more credibility than the RL world cup

2012 - One year closer to the death of the NRL

268,700 Australian Rules players Rugby League just 91,200

Who is this Lockyer?
These threads made for debate are they?
Some aren't, most are.

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 7:01 pm
by NSWAFL
They all are in my opinion. Are you up for an argument on any of those subjects, Parra? How long would you like? 5 minute or the half hour?

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 7:01 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Sure they are.

They are posted to get an antagonistic response, that's plain as day.

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 7:02 pm
by NSWAFL
Oh Parra's sooking again! Grow a set!

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 7:03 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
NSWAFL wrote:
They all are in my opinion. Are you up for an argument on any of those subjects, Parra? How long would you like? 5 minute or the half hour?

What do you want to talk about RUNVS?

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 7:04 pm
by NSWAFL
:(/ :(/ :(/

I don't have an account on League Unlimited, princess. Keep making an idiot of yourself.

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 7:06 pm
by cos789
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
These threads made for debate are they?
parafeel! Are you trying to make an intelligent point ?
You want us to take something you've said seriously and not treat it like the usual garbage that comes out of your Tourette's-like mouth ?
You cannot have it both ways.(Maybe you can).
You cannot constantly trash talk then ask people to take your point seriously.
Do you want to be a little bit sensible ?

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 7:08 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Oi, If I can't call you Cuzzy Tom, you can't call me Parrafeel.