Page 2 of 4
Re: Mungoball
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:55 am
by Beaussie
enarelle wrote:Come on you guys only keep finding one rugger bugger at a time who despises League for pushing union into the background.
Huh, last time I looked Rugby Union owned you lot even in this country. Canberra a prime example.
Re: Mungoball
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:57 am
by Topper
Precisely, Beaussie.
Re: Mungoball
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:20 am
by Raiderdave
Beaussie wrote:enarelle wrote:Come on you guys only keep finding one rugger bugger at a time who despises League for pushing union into the background.
Huh, last time I looked Rugby Union owned you lot even in this country. Canberra a prime example.
the insolvent brumbies ......
Re: Mungoball
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:26 am
by Judge J
Can you prove this, Raider Dave?
Re: Mungoball
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:39 am
by Raiderdave
Judge J wrote:Can you prove this, Raider Dave?
provide the insolvent brumbies ?
well ...
.. they might be training today ... I'll see what they're doing this arvo
I'm ringing Andrew Fagan now
will that do your honour ?
Re: Mungoball
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:53 am
by Judge J
No it will not. You need visible written evidence of their insolvency.
Re: Mungoball
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:09 am
by Raiderdave
Judge J wrote:No it will not. You need visible written evidence of their insolvency.
I object
Re: Mungoball
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:11 am
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Judge J wrote:No it will not. You need visible written evidence of their insolvency.
I object
You object to backing any of your statements up with proof.
What a surprise!
Re: Mungoball
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:20 am
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Judge J wrote:No it will not. You need visible written evidence of their insolvency.
I object
You object to backing any of your statements up with proof.
What a surprise!
sustained
Re: Mungoball
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 12:35 pm
by Judge J
Raiderdave wrote:Judge J wrote:No it will not. You need visible written evidence of their insolvency.
I object
On what grounds?
Re: Mungoball
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 12:43 pm
by Xman
Judge J wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Judge J wrote:No it will not. You need visible written evidence of their insolvency.
I object
On what grounds?
Blatant stupidity
Re: Mungoball
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:07 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Judge J wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
I object
On what grounds?
Blatant stupidity
I objected .... not you
Re: Mungoball
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:39 pm
by Judge J
Xman, I was asking Raider Dave for the grounds for his objection. His last complaint is justified.
So Raider Dave, what are the grounds for your objection to my statement?
Re: Mungoball
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 2:12 pm
by Raiderdave
Judge J wrote:Xman, I was asking Raider Dave for the grounds for his objection. His last complaint is justified.
So Raider Dave, what are the grounds for your objection to my statement?
yeah ... keep outta this Xman
on the grounds that I was to provide CEO of said penniless Brumbies
more then enough evidence one would of thought your honour
Re: Mungoball
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 4:07 pm
by Judge J
Overruled. That is not written evidence. Heresay is not permissable.