Talking Footy

And yet another fart.

Thanyou Topper sir. Could you tell me how it smelt?

regards,
King

King-Eliagh wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

NSWAFL the ACT is not part of this state though? So tell me, why are they included?

Because the figures were calculated by AFL NSW/ACT.

So ah tell me, because the figures were calculated by AFL NSW ACT this means that the ACT is now a part of the state of NSW NSWAFL?

It is a part of AFL NSW/ACT. Read the name. That's what it covers.

NSWAFL wrote:

Dave and King, you are wrong. The numbers given are 85,000 are for the whole state. This includes the very strong Riverina region. It also includes Canberra and the Sapphire Coast which has been strong for some time. Our big increases also include the North Coast and the South Coast around the Nowra region that is not included in your Illawarra figures. Then there is the Central West, Broken Hill and the Summerland region.

Ok so you agree now then that the numbers are not for "the whole state" and that the AFL could not figure the same.

How on earth do you work that out, King?

King-Eliagh wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

Dave and King, you are wrong. The numbers given are 85,000 are for the whole state. This includes the very strong Riverina region. It also includes Canberra and the Sapphire Coast which has been strong for some time. Our big increases also include the North Coast and the South Coast around the Nowra region that is not included in your Illawarra figures. Then there is the Central West, Broken Hill and the Summerland region.

Ok so you agree now then that the numbers are not for "the whole state" and that the AFL could not figure the same.

yes E

he seems to be saying here he accepts the figure of 85K .. straight up .. no reference to any other meaning here .. but this 85K is for players aged 12 years & that there are this many across NSW ... this being our ONLY misinterpretation.

now .. he is back peddling in other threads .. taking the Xman BS line .. that it infact is refering to players .. all players ( including ausfudge ones) .. under 12 years of age
despite it saying .... nothing of the sort in the sentence proclaiming the figure of 85K

a confused & disoriented drop kick NSWAFL seems to be

I was always stating that the figures counted all players under 12. You assume otherwise and you are wrong.

NSWAFL wrote:

I was always stating that the figures counted all players under 12. You assume otherwise and you are wrong.

where

NSWAFL wrote:
Dave and King, you are wrong. The numbers given are 85,000 are for the whole state. This includes the very strong Riverina region. It also includes Canberra and the Sapphire Coast which has been strong for some time. Our big increases also include the North Coast and the South Coast around the Nowra region that is not included in your Illawarra figures. Then there is the Central West, Broken Hill and the Summerland region.

not one reference saying its for all players under 12 & thats where we have misunderstood

not one here .. or any of the posts that followed from you
good try
but you don't know what the hell you're talking about
do you ?

Stop that burp machine labelled "RD", someone!

Beaussies the man to talk to Topper. You go send him a pm eh

Raiderdave wrote:

not one reference saying its for all players under 12 & thats where we have misunderstood

not one here .. or any of the posts that followed from you
good try
but you don't know what the hell you're talking about
do you ?

Yes I do, and you don't. The reference is in the original figures that I am supporting and have done from the beginning.

NSWAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

not one reference saying its for all players under 12 & thats where we have misunderstood

not one here .. or any of the posts that followed from you
good try
but you don't know what the hell you're talking about
do you ?

Yes I do, and you don't. The reference is in the original figures that I am supporting and have done from the beginning.

again... where do you say this article refers to ausfudge only .. like Xman says it does ?

NSWAFL wrote:
Dave and King, you are wrong. The numbers given are 85,000 are for the whole state. This includes the very strong Riverina region. It also includes Canberra and the Sapphire Coast which has been strong for some time. Our big increases also include the North Coast and the South Coast around the Nowra region that is not included in your Illawarra figures. Then there is the Central West, Broken Hill and the Summerland region.

oh
thats right ... you didn't
because you believed these WERE the number of AR players aged 12 years in NSW .. & 12 years only
your lame @rsed attempts to explain them only refer to them being from all ova NSW ... nothing else here

you realised your mistake
& changed tack ... like the back peddling drongo you are

Hoiw old are you anyway? What's your IQ? You're making this all up as you go. I NEVER specified that it was 85,000 12 year olds. You said that and you were wrong. There was no change of tack, except in your confused, befuddled and bewitched brain.

The study is for ALL players under the age of 12. That is the fact and it is now your job to prove that it refers to 12 year olds only. You are the only one making that claim and it's about time you proved that it's the aim of the statistics provided originally.

NSWAFL wrote:

Hoiw old are you anyway? What's your IQ? You're making this all up as you go. I NEVER specified that it was 85,000 12 year olds.

You said that and you were wrong. There was no change of tack, except in your confused, befuddled and bewitched brain.

The study is for ALL players under the age of 12. That is the fact and it is now your job to prove that it refers to 12 year olds only. You are the only one making that claim and it's about time you proved that it's the aim of the statistics provided originally.

I NEVER specified that it was 85,000 12 year olds

so we have this after .... this

The numbers given are 85,000 are for the whole state

no reference to anything about ages .. just that it was for ALL of NSW

You said that and you were wrong.

ah no... Xman said I was

The study is for ALL players under the age of 12.

its a study now is it

That is the fact and it is now your job to prove that it refers to 12 year olds only

the use of the term U12's ... will do just fine
add an S .. & it instantly refers to a specific age group...

Ages 5-12
U12's

big difference

You'll never get the burp machine to prove anything, NSWAFL.