Talking Footy

Raiderdave wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

The article has been written by someone who doesn't understand AFL. That much is clear.

no he does understand AFL

just won't accept their lying BS ways ....

I strongly recommend that you check that lying talk, bub. The numbers presented for U12 players was correct and includes the whole state of New South Wales and for the record the ACT because the figures were prepared by AFL NSW/ACT. The article writer is wrong and biased against Australia's greatest and most exciting game.

NSWAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

The article has been written by someone who doesn't understand AFL. That much is clear.

no he does understand AFL

just won't accept their lying BS ways ....

I strongly recommend that you check that lying talk, bub. The numbers presented for U12 players was correct and includes the whole state of New South Wales and for the record the ACT because the figures were prepared by AFL NSW/ACT. The article writer is wrong and biased against Australia's greatest and most exciting game.

really
your buddy Xman . a fellow AFL pud puller ... says they are obviously not correct
& I misunderstood the article


which is it ....

is Xman wrong ?

No he's not wrong. The interpretation of the article is what's not correct, and you did misunderstand.

NSWAFL wrote:

No he's not wrong. The interpretation of the article is what's not correct, and you did misunderstand.

no
hes saying theres no way in hell .. theres 86K AR U12 players in NSW

you're saying it is the number .. this is correct

which is it NSWAFL ..... ?

Even within that question, you are guilty of misinterpretation. Go back and understand the whole situation, and then ask a more rational question.

NSWAFL wrote:

Even within that question, you are guilty of misinterpretation. Go back and understand the whole situation, and then ask a more rational question.

answer the question

are there 86K U12 AR players in NSW ... or not ?

Yes there are.

NSWAFL wrote:

Yes there are.

hey Xman
you're wrong ... I read the article just fine according to NSWAFL
its you who misunderstood

no talk of these 86K being anything other then U12's AR players ..for ol NSWAFL
auskick ?
no
86K U12's AR players

bull honkey central .. or the AFL .. same diff

U12 equals everyone under 12. 11 yo, 10 yo etc etc.

As I said, you are interpreting it wrong.

NSWAFL wrote:

U12 equals everyone under 12. 11 yo, 10 yo etc etc.

As I said, you are interpreting it wrong.

so you're pulling the Xman BS excuse

so what happened to your .... oh but they're true .. its all of NSW don't ya know
now its ... ummm .... errrrrr ... its everyone under 12..


you are a confused wombat
not sure what it is you're saying

in defending the empire of lies .. the AFL .. you changed your tune 5 times
back n forth
you were all ova the place .. like a mad womens cr@p

If you are not sure what it is I'm saying, then it proves you are confused, befuddled and bewitched like I said before.

I was never all over the place and nor did I change what I said at all.

NSWAFL wrote:

If you are not sure what it is I'm saying, then it proves you are confused, befuddled and bewitched like I said before.

I was never all over the place and nor did I change what I said at all.

me ?

no one does

including .. you

Everyone understands me, except you. And perhaps King although I'm not sure about him presently.

NSWAFL wrote:

Everyone understands me, except you. And perhaps King although I'm not sure about him presently.

you're a ranting nutter

flipping & flopping around like a tuna thats just been landed
best stop commenting til you get a handle on what the F'ing hell it is ... you're trying to say

Sounds like you should take your own advice, Dave. You're flipping around more than a landed marlin on the old wharf at Tathra.