Re: 3,613 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:11 am
Nice find cos.cos789 wrote:Let's see 30% of 8560 is 2568
Talking Footy
www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
8,003 Members for GWS / 6,424 Members for Titans
Page 2 of 16
Re: 3,613 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:13 pm
Beaussie wrote:Nice find cos.cos789 wrote:Let's see 30% of 8560 is 2568
thats even older .......... from November
& the Titans were about 500 ahead of GWS then .......
Re: 3,613 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:03 pm
I see the raiders are doing well. RD must be estatic.Beaussie wrote:Nice find cos.cos789 wrote:Let's see 30% of 8560 is 2568
for Re: 3,613 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:47 pm
Doesn't include new members.cos789 wrote:Let's see 30% of 8560 is 2568
Re: 3,613 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:53 pm
cos789 wrote:I see the raiders are doing well. RD must be estatic.Beaussie wrote:Nice find cos.cos789 wrote:Let's see 30% of 8560 is 2568
well they're doing better then the ... whats the term the AFL & its moronic fans are using .. Tsumani about to hit Sydney
GWS are
Re: 3,613 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:28 pm
What new members, cooee? There aren't any!
Re: 3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:27 pm
GWS now has 3,749 Members. Way to go Giants.
Poor ole Titans. Heartland
Poor ole Titans. Heartland
Re: 3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:23 pm
Beaussie wrote:GWS now has 3,749 Members. Way to go Giants.
Poor ole Titans. Heartland
just 500 behind the Titans ..... yes .. way to go Midgits
hmmmm
gezz they've got to be extremely worried bearsy
your update from 3 days ago 3,613
todays ... 3,749
just 136 signings in 3 days ... Souths get that in an hour ...
Re: 3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:31 pm
An outstanding result for a new team in a foreign market! =D>Beaussie wrote:GWS now has 3,749 Members. Way to go Giants.
Poor ole Titans. Heartland
Re: 3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:43 pm
Xman wrote:An outstanding result for a new team in a foreign market! =D>Beaussie wrote:GWS now has 3,749 Members. Way to go Giants.
Poor ole Titans. Heartland
yes but is it an outstanding result for a .... tsunami
will the nrl really not know ... what hit them when they start playing
are they as rudy dippo... dippa ... derpaderpia described them....are they really .. massive
hmmmmm
Re: 3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:44 pm
The only people talking tsunami is you.Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:An outstanding result for a new team in a foreign market! =D>Beaussie wrote:GWS now has 3,749 Members. Way to go Giants.
Poor ole Titans. Heartland
yes but is it an outstanding result for a .... tsunami
will the nrl really not know ... what hit them when they start playing
are they as rudy dippo... dippa ... derpaderpia described them....are they really .. massive
hmmmmm
Re: 3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:52 pm
PTC and BeArsey posting old news to try and make a point?
They wouldn't stoop that low would they?
Hmmmmmmm.
They wouldn't stoop that low would they?
Hmmmmmmm.
Re: 3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 10:12 pm
A tsunami of burps??
Re: 3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 10:18 pm
Got a link for the current Titans membership numbers?Raiderdave wrote:Beaussie wrote:GWS now has 3,749 Members. Way to go Giants.
Poor ole Titans. Heartland
just 500 behind the Titans ..... yes .. way to go Midgits
hmmmm
gezz they've got to be extremely worried bearsy
your update from 3 days ago 3,613
todays ... 3,749
just 136 signings in 3 days ... Souths get that in an hour ...
Re: 3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 10:19 pm
No one has an accurate one.