Xman wrote:Omg! What's the point in the NRL having 5 city broadcasts? There's no teams in 2 of the cities, and the other regularly gets crowds of less than 10k despite being ladder leaders located in a city that loves attending sport!!!Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Haha, coming from a supporter of a code that regularly jerks off over garbage TV ratings results. Yet the AFL just let their product do the talking and cash in!
The AFL attract far more media attention because far more Australians are interested in AFL.
they're amazing results .............
having one less FTA game a week
& only shown in prime time ... in 2 capital cities .. to the AFL's 5
but still... belting the AFL to a bloody pulp
yep
thats a news worthy story
& it makes your last comment quite silly really....![]()
The cumulative figures are rubbish as shown in the tv ratings thread on this forum, and you are now ignoring it. The NRL claim to have won a ratings race that counts heavily in their favor, includes internationals, a longer season, and 7 weekly viewable games to the AFL's 4.
Yet after all this, all they do is compare their deal to the massive result clinched by the AFL! " look at me, look at me" DG cries, just like the ugly sister craving attention. She prostituted herself to payTV long ago. Now all the boys are sick of her.
Cool story bro!
LOL...........


like I said to some other vicky kicky fan on here
you can't sail a boat on denial
it aint a river in Africa


