Page 2 of 7

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2011 7:52 pm
by Beaussie
eels fan wrote:
Failed with a 15k average and a shyte team LOL.

Had the funding pulled because of the need to keep real clubs.
Crowds dropped in their second and final season to 7k. More than half the supporters stopped going and the Adelaide Rams folded after just two seasons. Wow, NRL expansion has been an amazing success... NOT!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

http://stats.rleague.com/rl/crowds/adelaide.html

And you still wonder why Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product compared to the jewel in Australian sport... the AFL.

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2011 7:54 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Yep, that's after they knew the team was getting axed, but you knew that and still tell porkies.

Shows what a low life you really are I suppose.

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2011 7:54 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Back tomorrow to laugh at, and put shit on you and your giggleball.

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2011 7:56 pm
by Beaussie
eels fan wrote:
Yep, that's after they knew the team was getting axed, but you knew that and still tell porkies.
More like the novelty wore off and the people realised what a boring sport Rugby League really is. Those crowds were on par with NRL crowds in Sydney. Says it all doesn't it. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 8:08 am
by Raiderdave
Beaussie wrote:
eels fan wrote:
Good, send them to Adelaide, I'm sure they can give Port Power a run LOL.
Oh dear, Adelaide has been tried and failed dopey. Have you ever noticed the Rugby League tv ratings in Adelaide. Abysmal like the crowds for one off games in the city.
they didn't fail dipshit ....the super league peace deal saw the end of the poor old Rams
we'll be back in SA one day
:wink:

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 8:11 am
by Beaussie
Raiderdave wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
eels fan wrote:
Good, send them to Adelaide, I'm sure they can give Port Power a run LOL.
Oh dear, Adelaide has been tried and failed dopey. Have you ever noticed the Rugby League tv ratings in Adelaide. Abysmal like the crowds for one off games in the city.
they didn't fail dipshit ....the super league peace deal saw the end of the poor old Rams
we'll be back in SA one day
:wink:
Crowds dropped to less than half the first season average with less than 7k attending. Not a failure? Talk about a dipshit. #-o

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 8:33 am
by Raiderdave
hmmmmmm

Thuns & GWS will make the Rams look like Manchester united in a few years :lol: :lol: :lol: :wink:

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 8:42 am
by Beaussie
Raiderdave wrote:
hmmmmmm

Thuns & GWS will make the Rams look like Manchester united in a few years :lol: :lol: :lol: :wink:
You ought to concern yourself with the fact that 15 of your 16 NRL clubs are broke. What a pathetic state of affairs.

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 8:45 am
by Raiderdave
Beaussie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
hmmmmmm

Thuns & GWS will make the Rams look like Manchester united in a few years :lol: :lol: :lol: :wink:
You ought to concern yourself with the fact that 15 of your 16 NRL clubs are broke. What a pathetic state of affairs.
I have nothing to be concerned about
not one is broke :wink:

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 8:49 am
by Beaussie
Raiderdave wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
hmmmmmm

Thuns & GWS will make the Rams look like Manchester united in a few years :lol: :lol: :lol: :wink:
You ought to concern yourself with the fact that 15 of your 16 NRL clubs are broke. What a pathetic state of affairs.
I have nothing to be concerned about
not one is broke :wink:
Head in the sand still I see.
Wests Tigers director David Trodden, the spokesman for the clubs, said: ''The clubs were of the belief that there was a funding facility in place to allow that to happen, but there is a bit of doubt about that now.

''What I do know is that having 15 of 16 [clubs] losing money is not sustainable in the long term. The days of leagues clubs putting their hands in their pockets have gone. They are not going, they are gone.''

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... z1bvJXC0Kd

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 9:01 am
by Raiderdave
losing money ...
2/3 of AFL clubs do exactly the same , probably more

no mention of being broke ...
cos they aint :wink:

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 6:07 pm
by Beaussie
Very few of our clubs are struggling and any that are we have billions to address short term financial difficulties. You lot on the other hand....

Well.... :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2011 8:29 am
by Raiderdave
Beaussie wrote:
Very few of our clubs are struggling and any that are we have billions to address short term financial difficulties. You lot on the other hand....

Well.... :lol: :lol: :lol:
2/3's don;t know their ear hole from their @sshole
some with more then double ... some ... triple .. the members of NRL clubs .... they are losing millions a year

if the AFL & in some cases ... taxpayers .. weren't bailing them out
they'd be gone ...........

more flogball smoke n mirrors
& its about time its dopey fans .. like you ... woke up to it :wink:

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2011 8:52 am
by AFL Warrior
The NRL will soon be begging Channel 31 to screen their rubbish product!

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:31 am
by ParraEelsNRL
It'd still out rate fumbleball regardless :(/ :)))