Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Which is the best football code? Here you can have it out with other football fans.
User avatar
Beaussie
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 9556
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location: Sydney
Has thanked: 340 times
Been liked: 74 times

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Post by Beaussie »

eels fan wrote:
Failed with a 15k average and a shyte team LOL.

Had the funding pulled because of the need to keep real clubs.
Crowds dropped in their second and final season to 7k. More than half the supporters stopped going and the Adelaide Rams folded after just two seasons. Wow, NRL expansion has been an amazing success... NOT!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

http://stats.rleague.com/rl/crowds/adelaide.html

And you still wonder why Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product compared to the jewel in Australian sport... the AFL.
ParraEelsNRL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 9495
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
Team: Parramatta
Location: Rugby League Heartland
Has thanked: 14 times
Been liked: 9 times

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Post by ParraEelsNRL »

Yep, that's after they knew the team was getting axed, but you knew that and still tell porkies.

Shows what a low life you really are I suppose.
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
ParraEelsNRL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 9495
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
Team: Parramatta
Location: Rugby League Heartland
Has thanked: 14 times
Been liked: 9 times

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Post by ParraEelsNRL »

Back tomorrow to laugh at, and put shit on you and your giggleball.
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User avatar
Beaussie
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 9556
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location: Sydney
Has thanked: 340 times
Been liked: 74 times

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Post by Beaussie »

eels fan wrote:
Yep, that's after they knew the team was getting axed, but you knew that and still tell porkies.
More like the novelty wore off and the people realised what a boring sport Rugby League really is. Those crowds were on par with NRL crowds in Sydney. Says it all doesn't it. :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Post by Raiderdave »

Beaussie wrote:
eels fan wrote:
Good, send them to Adelaide, I'm sure they can give Port Power a run LOL.
Oh dear, Adelaide has been tried and failed dopey. Have you ever noticed the Rugby League tv ratings in Adelaide. Abysmal like the crowds for one off games in the city.
they didn't fail dipshit ....the super league peace deal saw the end of the poor old Rams
we'll be back in SA one day
:wink:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
Beaussie
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 9556
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location: Sydney
Has thanked: 340 times
Been liked: 74 times

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Post by Beaussie »

Raiderdave wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
eels fan wrote:
Good, send them to Adelaide, I'm sure they can give Port Power a run LOL.
Oh dear, Adelaide has been tried and failed dopey. Have you ever noticed the Rugby League tv ratings in Adelaide. Abysmal like the crowds for one off games in the city.
they didn't fail dipshit ....the super league peace deal saw the end of the poor old Rams
we'll be back in SA one day
:wink:
Crowds dropped to less than half the first season average with less than 7k attending. Not a failure? Talk about a dipshit. #-o
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Post by Raiderdave »

hmmmmmm

Thuns & GWS will make the Rams look like Manchester united in a few years :lol: :lol: :lol: :wink:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
Beaussie
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 9556
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location: Sydney
Has thanked: 340 times
Been liked: 74 times

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Post by Beaussie »

Raiderdave wrote:
hmmmmmm

Thuns & GWS will make the Rams look like Manchester united in a few years :lol: :lol: :lol: :wink:
You ought to concern yourself with the fact that 15 of your 16 NRL clubs are broke. What a pathetic state of affairs.
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Post by Raiderdave »

Beaussie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
hmmmmmm

Thuns & GWS will make the Rams look like Manchester united in a few years :lol: :lol: :lol: :wink:
You ought to concern yourself with the fact that 15 of your 16 NRL clubs are broke. What a pathetic state of affairs.
I have nothing to be concerned about
not one is broke :wink:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
Beaussie
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 9556
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location: Sydney
Has thanked: 340 times
Been liked: 74 times

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Post by Beaussie »

Raiderdave wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
hmmmmmm

Thuns & GWS will make the Rams look like Manchester united in a few years :lol: :lol: :lol: :wink:
You ought to concern yourself with the fact that 15 of your 16 NRL clubs are broke. What a pathetic state of affairs.
I have nothing to be concerned about
not one is broke :wink:
Head in the sand still I see.
Wests Tigers director David Trodden, the spokesman for the clubs, said: ''The clubs were of the belief that there was a funding facility in place to allow that to happen, but there is a bit of doubt about that now.

''What I do know is that having 15 of 16 [clubs] losing money is not sustainable in the long term. The days of leagues clubs putting their hands in their pockets have gone. They are not going, they are gone.''

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... z1bvJXC0Kd
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Post by Raiderdave »

losing money ...
2/3 of AFL clubs do exactly the same , probably more

no mention of being broke ...
cos they aint :wink:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
Beaussie
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 9556
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location: Sydney
Has thanked: 340 times
Been liked: 74 times

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Post by Beaussie »

Very few of our clubs are struggling and any that are we have billions to address short term financial difficulties. You lot on the other hand....

Well.... :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Post by Raiderdave »

Beaussie wrote:
Very few of our clubs are struggling and any that are we have billions to address short term financial difficulties. You lot on the other hand....

Well.... :lol: :lol: :lol:
2/3's don;t know their ear hole from their @sshole
some with more then double ... some ... triple .. the members of NRL clubs .... they are losing millions a year

if the AFL & in some cases ... taxpayers .. weren't bailing them out
they'd be gone ...........

more flogball smoke n mirrors
& its about time its dopey fans .. like you ... woke up to it :wink:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
AFL Warrior
Captain
Captain
Posts: 862
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 11:39 am
Team: Collingwood
Location: AFL Death Star Melbourne
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Post by AFL Warrior »

The NRL will soon be begging Channel 31 to screen their rubbish product!
ParraEelsNRL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 9495
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
Team: Parramatta
Location: Rugby League Heartland
Has thanked: 14 times
Been liked: 9 times

Re: Foxtel considers Rugby League a downmarket product

Post by ParraEelsNRL »

It'd still out rate fumbleball regardless :(/ :)))
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 8 guests