Talking Footy

Raiderdave wrote:

you see if you can disprove it ... & make me look like a fool
for once

Anyone who demands proof of a negative is losing the battle. You made the claim. You prove it.

TLPG wrote:

.....in Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth!

1 State Of Origin Rugby League Qld V Nsw 3rd – Match Nine 2,468,000 1,087,000 338,000 899,000 65,000 79,000
2 State Of Origin Rugby League Qld V Nsw 3rd – Post Match Nine 2,190,000 909,000 275,000 880,000 69,000 57,000
3 Masterchef Australia Wed Ten 1,701,000 402,000 656,000 239,000 200,000 205,000
http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2011/07/week-28-4.html

If the NRL can't rate outside of it's home states with it's biggest mid year event, what chance has it got?

Wow, massive win for Masterchef and Channel 10 in Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth. Massive.

Beaussie wrote:

TLPG wrote:

.....in Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth!

1 State Of Origin Rugby League Qld V Nsw 3rd – Match Nine 2,468,000 1,087,000 338,000 899,000 65,000 79,000
2 State Of Origin Rugby League Qld V Nsw 3rd – Post Match Nine 2,190,000 909,000 275,000 880,000 69,000 57,000
3 Masterchef Australia Wed Ten 1,701,000 402,000 656,000 239,000 200,000 205,000
http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2011/07/week-28-4.html

If the NRL can't rate outside of it's home states with it's biggest mid year event, what chance has it got?

Wow, massive win for Masterchef and Channel 10 in Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth. Massive.

insert the same line when referring to Swans ratings
but the show that beat them is not the highest non sports show there is .... its.......... a re run of the Brady Bunch :_<>

TLPG wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

you see if you can disprove it ... & make me look like a fool
for once

Anyone who demands proof of a negative is losing the battle. You made the claim. You prove it.

yep yr right so....
you're the doubter .. the one being negative
so under your rules
you have to prove it ... don't you

Beaussie wrote:

TLPG wrote:

.....in Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth!

1 State Of Origin Rugby League Qld V Nsw 3rd – Match Nine 2,468,000 1,087,000 338,000 899,000 65,000 79,000
2 State Of Origin Rugby League Qld V Nsw 3rd – Post Match Nine 2,190,000 909,000 275,000 880,000 69,000 57,000
3 Masterchef Australia Wed Ten 1,701,000 402,000 656,000 239,000 200,000 205,000
http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2011/07/week-28-4.html

If the NRL can't rate outside of it's home states with it's biggest mid year event, what chance has it got?

Wow, massive win for Masterchef and Channel 10 in Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth. Massive.

Seems to be a high percentage on women in those cities going by those numbers
Edited by TLPG - Removed derogatory term

Raiderdave wrote:

TLPG wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

you see if you can disprove it ... & make me look like a fool
for once

Anyone who demands proof of a negative is losing the battle. You made the claim. You prove it.

yep yr right so....
you're the doubter .. the one being negative
so under your rules
you have to prove it ... don't you

It has been proven already. The Titans silence to the newspaper article rather than denying it publicly is the act of a guilty party.

Prove otherwise.

And I take it that you don't believe in House Husbands?

TLPG wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

TLPG wrote:

Anyone who demands proof of a negative is losing the battle. You made the claim. You prove it.

yep yr right so....
you're the doubter .. the one being negative
so under your rules
you have to prove it ... don't you

It has been proven already. The Titans silence to the newspaper article rather than denying it publicly is the act of a guilty party.

Prove otherwise.

And I take it that you don't believe in House Husbands?

now your getting your posts mixed up
look back through these posts & you'll see this isn't even what we were talking about here

& house husbands ... WTF ?

The house husband comment was intended for Rick, just to clear that up.

And yes, I did get two posts mixed up - so to clarify.....
I said something you said is not correct. I never said that something existed. I said it didn't - in effect. Telling to prove that it didn't is proving a negative, and that is something that you do not ask for. The onus is on you - not me.

So - prove to me that the term "rugby league" was first used in Australia in 1908.

TLPG wrote:

The house husband comment was intended for Rick, just to clear that up.

And yes, I did get two posts mixed up - so to clarify.....
I said something you said is not correct. I never said that something existed. I said it didn't - in effect. Telling to prove that it didn't is proving a negative, and that is something that you do not ask for. The onus is on you - not me.

So - prove to me that the term "rugby league" was first used in Australia in 1908.

so you want me to do what I;ve done a dozen times since I've been posting here
you ask me to prove something I claim infering I'm not correct.. & I do proving you wrong
why would I want to do that ..... again
I'm sick of doing all the work in this relationship

for something entirely different
you prove me wrong ...... for once

You're asking me for information that doesn't exist. I say the term was NOT first used in Australia. In any year. That is the meaning of my objection. (As a side note - see that I am prepared to explain myself, unlike Raider!)

YOU prove ME wrong.

TLPG wrote:

You're asking me for information that doesn't exist. I say the term was NOT first used in Australia. In any year. That is the meaning of my objection. (As a side note - see that I am prepared to explain myself, unlike Raider!)

YOU prove ME wrong.

you haven't looked very hard ........have you

One more chance, Raider. YOU PROVE ME WRONG.

Or are you unable to do so and therefore lose whatever credibility you have left?

TLPG wrote:

One more chance, Raider. YOU PROVE ME WRONG.

Or are you unable to do so and therefore lose whatever credibility you have left?

oh I have on numerous occasions , more times then you'd care to think about
its time for you to pull the digit out & do some work for a change

You haven't worked a day in your short life, kid! You've proved NOTHING! Except that you're more stupid than the Tazzie Devil!