www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
Raiderdave wrote:Brandz wrote:I still think the ratings are closer then what you think Dave.Raiderdave wrote:
yes ...
ah cockhead
that NRL figure is for the NRL competition only
it does not include the SOO
either Test against NZ
the all stars match
or the city country match
how do I know this shit for brains ?
because in 2011 Rugby League attracted 134 Million veiwers
sorta kinda think ... that if it dropped by 20 Million ... it mighta made a headline or 2 ... don't ya think
wow
what a dick
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... 1o58v.html
RUGBY league's new Independent Commission will demand a full-season schedule from its new television rights partner in 2013 after yesterday's chief executives conference revealed rugby league as the highest ratings sport on Australian TV, outweighing the AFL by 12 million viewers this year.
In the first annual chairmen and chief executives conference involving the incoming commissioners, plus representatives from all major state and national leagues, the 2011 season review revealed rugby league had a cumulative audience of 134 million viewers, without including a further 12 million in New Zealand.
The NRL also won the battle against the AFL on highest average ratings, taking out the top rankings on free-to-air and pay television, while audiences grew on both mediums by 1.3 per cent and 16 per cent respectively.
The results impressed the soon-to-be-commissioners, all of whom agreed with the clubs that the new TV rights deal needed to reflect rugby league's television audience dominance.
Advertisement "They are a powerful set of results across the coverage of the game," NRL chief executive David Gallop said. "As we look towards media negotiations in the months ahead they are a reminder of rugby league's value in the market."
Commission chairman John Grant was just as buoyant and was confident that once the new body was in place television rights would be the first matter on the agenda to develop the game.
"It is important that as we look towards a significant growth in revenue that there is a strategy that underpins the way that money is used,'' he said.
The meeting involved lengthy discussion of TV rights negotiations, reiterating that they would start after the commission officially took control.
The commission and the clubs would strongly pursue the concept of a ''full-season'' schedule with days and time slots determined at the start of the year, unlike the rolling schedule that exists at present.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... z2SCPo4mRf
I think you have trouble working out the difference between yr A hole & yr ear hole
lets just leave it at that shall we
Now that was the growth from 2011 to 2012.The NRL also won the battle against the AFL on highest average ratings, taking out the top rankings on free-to-air and pay television, while audiences grew on both mediums by 1.3 per cent and 16 per cent respectively.
2011 ratings for NRL were 134m and an extra 12m for NZ as dave has said with links to back it up,I still think the ratings are closer then what you think Dave.
We have a NEW Raiderdave clone - devoid of all independent thought but a blind obsession to try and prove his tiny wincy penis is bigger than everyone else - either that or he is just another alias of Raiderdave - from now on he will be Eelasseaider! TV ratings are not reliable http://m.smh.com.au/entertainment/tv-an ... 1dr9m.html and http://raws.adc.rmit.edu.au/~e81843/blog2/?p=1335. You blokes quote these sources that are far from reliable - 3000 homes measured out of 660000 in that area is hardly a suitable test group for 4.6 million people and doesn't stack up - thats why other areas are equally important - Sponsorship, membership, crowds, participation rates and revenue are equally as important - taking just one of those areas because it favours your argument (and is clearly questionable) just shows your prepared to lie! You know ur beat wanker!eelofwest wrote:Brandy
2011 ratings for NRL were 134m and an extra 12m for NZ as dave has said with links to back it up,I still think the ratings are closer then what you think Dave.
Now FTA ratings for 2011 to 2012 season were up 1.3% and fox ratings for 2011 to 2012 were up 16%.
Now if you do the maths on these facts you will come to a easy conclusion that the NRL is miles ahead of the AFL on tele.
I really cant see how hard this is to understand Brands?????
Furthermore the NRL is up 6%+ on FTA and up 14% on Fox in the 2013 season................the gap is growing larger every year Brands, hope this clears things up for you mate.
AFL 123 MillionPhelpsy wrote:There is no way the nrl outrates the AFL . Twist figures however you want ... Add in Toyota cup and qld cup or whatever , AFL dominates the ratings in this country . Just look at pay tv ... AFL are miles ahead .... Scaling together figures from minor comps is desperate.
Answer my previous question you coward - come on big bigger enough you liar - 3000 homes rated in 660000 is less than .0046% justify how this is reliable! Tell me how they are doing on Membership, sponsorship, participation rates and crowd numbers in comparison!Raiderdave wrote:AFL 123 MillionPhelpsy wrote:There is no way the nrl outrates the AFL . Twist figures however you want ... Add in Toyota cup and qld cup or whatever , AFL dominates the ratings in this country . Just look at pay tv ... AFL are miles ahead .... Scaling together figures from minor comps is desperate.
RL ..... 134 MIllion
yes , thats domination all right , except not by the singletballers