Talking Footy

Port, Fremantle, suns, lions and Sydney all had increases on last years crowds.

Dave? Any comment?

Drac wrote:

45k in Adelaide, 60k in Melbs. Did any crowd in the nRL tonight crack 20k?

oooooooooohhhhhhh

90% in Adelaide

so close to making that tiny ...... miniscule list of ONE ... that the fumbles & bumbles has for cities that can properly fill a venue with ova 95% of its capacity

do I need to post the RL one again ?

Xman wrote:

Port, Fremantle, suns, lions and Sydney all had increases on last years crowds.

Dave? Any comment?

comment
yes


even with yr biggest sides firing ....
even with 22 more games then 2010
your failing declining code was STILL watched by more then 300,000 less fans .... then attended in 2010
with the 3rd lowest average in 15 years

that's ..... more games
and many ..... many less fans

anyone not living in a bubble would be alarmed .... seriously alarmed

but by all means ..... you guys get into yr circle jerk
lube up
& do what ya do best

:_<> :_<> :_<>

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Port, Fremantle, suns, lions and Sydney all had increases on last years crowds.

Dave? Any comment?

comment
yes


even with yr biggest sides firing ....
even with 22 more games then 2010
your failing declining code was STILL watched by more then 300,000 less fans .... then attended in 2010
with the 3rd lowest average in 15 years

that's ..... more games
and many ..... many less fans

anyone not living in a bubble would be alarmed .... seriously alarmed

but by all means ..... you guys get into yr circle jerk
lube up
& do what ya do best

:_<> :_<> :_<>

I was merely crushing your stupidity about only Melbourne teams growing.

As for the biggest clubs.....what horseshit. These teams always draw well whether near the bottom or top.

As for your more games claim....more games in smaller stadiums and in expansion states. This is the first season for a few years where the conditions are comparable, and growth resulted

AFL crowds up by 2% despite your claims they would drop again. Meanwhile the NRL are in free fall despite no change to teams, number of games, anything

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Port, Fremantle, suns, lions and Sydney all had increases on last years crowds.

Dave? Any comment?

comment
yes


even with yr biggest sides firing ....
even with 22 more games then 2010
your failing declining code was STILL watched by more then 300,000 less fans .... then attended in 2010
with the 3rd lowest average in 15 years

that's ..... more games
and many ..... many less fans

anyone not living in a bubble would be alarmed .... seriously alarmed

but by all means ..... you guys get into yr circle jerk
lube up
& do what ya do best

:_<> :_<> :_<>

As for the biggest clubs.....what horseshit. These teams always draw well whether near the bottom or top.

yes .. they go just was well when they're near the bottom of the ladder do they ?

:_<> :_<>

proof you're a cock

heres a sobering thought
when the fumbles n bumbles hit its peak in 2008 ....16 clubs in the comp minus the midgets & thuns
& most of the top sides NOT playing finals

that season had 440,000 more fans then this year MINUS .. the home attendances of the thuns & midgets

wow
what a fall

what a fall

I said they draw well, I didnt say as well you buffoon

Adding new expansion teams will always drop the average. Adding a higher proportion of games in expansion states was always going to drop the total. Unless of course the sport is RL, where the heartland city contains most of the minnow clubs!

Face it Dave, our league has shown growth, yours is sliding

Biggest teams firing? Adelaide and West Coast both had shocking seasons. Still averaged more people than the Broncos.....

Drac wrote:

Biggest teams firing? Adelaide and West Coast both had shocking seasons. Still averaged more people than the Broncos.....

even the lions doing not doing much either, averaging close to the broncos as well

adamj1300 wrote:

Drac wrote:

Biggest teams firing? Adelaide and West Coast both had shocking seasons. Still averaged more people than the Broncos.....

even the lions doing not doing much either, averaging close to the broncos as well

:_<> :_<> :_<>

yes

21,000 is .... close........... to 30,500 >

:_<> :_<>
the Broncos has their worst year ..... in their 25 year history
have never been worse

& will still post about 4 Million in profits

the Wions just missed out on the finals
& will post a LOSS of about 3 million

seriously
wind the losers up ... they have no idea how to run a successful business

Raiderdave wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

Drac wrote:

Biggest teams firing? Adelaide and West Coast both had shocking seasons. Still averaged more people than the Broncos.....

even the lions doing not doing much either, averaging close to the broncos as well

:_<> :_<> :_<>

yes

21,000 is .... close........... to 30,500 >

:_<> :_<>
the Broncos has their worst year ..... in their 25 year history
have never been worse

& will still post about 4 Million in profits

the Wions just missed out on the finals
& will post a LOSS of about 3 million

seriously
wind the losers up ... they have no idea how to run a successful business

care to prove any of your figures you claim Raiderdave? you wont because its all BS
the lions have been shit for the last 8 years
if the broncos where to make a profit it would be their pokie filled leagues club tha pays for the rugby club

adamj1300 wrote:

Drac wrote:

Biggest teams firing? Adelaide and West Coast both had shocking seasons. Still averaged more people than the Broncos.....

even the lions doing not doing much either, averaging close to the broncos as well

Lions 21083 ave
Broncos 31155 ave

that is not close you idiot.............. :_<> :_<> :_<>

adamj1300 wrote:

Drac wrote:

Biggest teams firing? Adelaide and West Coast both had shocking seasons. Still averaged more people than the Broncos.....

even the lions doing not doing much either, averaging close to the broncos as well

Broncos have had their worst year in history. Yet the lions are still way off the broncos. Don't make stupid claims. Derro alert!

Anyone see the crowds last night? The roosters and Souths attracted 60k to a home and away game and hawks and swans couldn't even match that in a finals game. Haha.

Jackyboy wrote:

Anyone see the crowds last night? The roosters and Souths attracted 60k to a home and away game and hawks and swans couldn't even match that in a finals game. Haha.

I think there was a crowd differance of only 300. 3rd largest ever crowd between the swans and hawks. You can take your small win on Friday, lets see what happens on Sunday.

Jackyboy wrote:

Anyone see the crowds last night? The roosters and Souths attracted 60k to a home and away game and hawks and swans couldn't even match that in a finals game. Haha.

lol a record home and away sized crowd for the bumsniffing