they were two consenting adults so his behaviour is nothing like Don Bourke or Weinstein.King-Eliagh wrote: Sat Dec 16, 2017 2:17 pmShe was well below the ranking of the executive, and well younger than him too. The exec resigned in shame, guilty as all hell. He must now be thanking his lucky stars it all came out in the relative dim light before Weinstein and don Bourke.
No I think it was exemplary behaviour. He went above and beyond the call of duty to make the young lady feel comfortable and safe in the workplace. It was a disgrace Gilly sacked him!! I mean all managers everywhere should be looking after their junior staff in this loving, caring manner. Give the bloke a medal I say. Yaayyyyyy!!!NlolRL wrote: Sat Dec 16, 2017 4:51 pmthey were two consenting adults so his behaviour is nothing like Don Bourke or Weinstein.King-Eliagh wrote: Sat Dec 16, 2017 2:17 pmShe was well below the ranking of the executive, and well younger than him too. The exec resigned in shame, guilty as all hell. He must now be thanking his lucky stars it all came out in the relative dim light before Weinstein and don Bourke.
I never said it was good behaviour, but comparing it to known sexual predators is misleading in the extreme. In fact from memory a female staffer of the NRL said he should never have been sacked.Terry wrote: Sat Dec 16, 2017 5:01 pmNo I think it was exemplary behaviour. He went above and beyond the call of duty to make the young lady feel comfortable and safe in the workplace. It was a disgrace Gilly sacked him!! I mean all managers everywhere should be looking after their junior staff in this loving, caring manner. Give the bloke a medal I say. Yaayyyyyy!!!NlolRL wrote: Sat Dec 16, 2017 4:51 pmthey were two consenting adults so his behaviour is nothing like Don Bourke or Weinstein.King-Eliagh wrote: Sat Dec 16, 2017 2:17 pmShe was well below the ranking of the executive, and well younger than him too. The exec resigned in shame, guilty as all hell. He must now be thanking his lucky stars it all came out in the relative dim light before Weinstein and don Bourke.
I saw what ya did there - deflect straight to RL - wow!! You,re very very good lolololololololol. Look you've won me over with your reasoned debate.NlolRL wrote: Sat Dec 16, 2017 5:05 pmI never said it was good behaviour, but comparing it to known sexual predators is misleading in the extreme. In fact from memory a female staffer of the NRL said he should never have been sacked.Terry wrote: Sat Dec 16, 2017 5:01 pmNo I think it was exemplary behaviour. He went above and beyond the call of duty to make the young lady feel comfortable and safe in the workplace. It was a disgrace Gilly sacked him!! I mean all managers everywhere should be looking after their junior staff in this loving, caring manner. Give the bloke a medal I say. Yaayyyyyy!!!NlolRL wrote: Sat Dec 16, 2017 4:51 pm
they were two consenting adults so his behaviour is nothing like Don Bourke or Weinstein.
“For goodness sake, that’s no-one’s business — it’s a matter between the man and the woman,” Lumby told Neil Mitchell on 3AW radio. “It’s a fact of life, A lot of people meet their life partners at work. “If (the women) have got no complaints about the way they were treated I actually disagree with the AFL’s actions ... with sexual behaviour the only thing I’m concerned about is if it’s safe and consensual.” Lumby serves as a gender adviser to the NRL and is working to ensure there are harsher penalties for players found guilty of mistreating women.
you call it deflection, I call it 1. evidence your code may not have even acted on such behaviour, and 2. a women involved in the ethical treatment of women by sportsmen considered the AFL's actions over-zealousTerry wrote: Sat Dec 16, 2017 5:56 pmI saw what ya did there - deflect straight to RL - wow!! You,re very very good lolololololololol. Look you've won me over with your reasoned debate.
It's much easier to ignore stuff, look the other way, block your ears and cover your eyes!! It takes a strong personalty and moral fortitude to stand up to wrong doers.
Well argued my friend. I'm with you in cowardice!!!!!
I'm on a joint party ticket with you on this one my friend. It's far easier to look away and pretend all is good in the world.NlolRL wrote: Sat Dec 16, 2017 6:04 pmyou call it deflection, I call it 1. evidence your code may not have even acted on such behaviour, and 2. a women involved in the ethical treatment of women by sportsmen considered the AFL's actions over-zealousTerry wrote: Sat Dec 16, 2017 5:56 pmI saw what ya did there - deflect straight to RL - wow!! You,re very very good lolololololololol. Look you've won me over with your reasoned debate.
It's much easier to ignore stuff, look the other way, block your ears and cover your eyes!! It takes a strong personalty and moral fortitude to stand up to wrong doers.
Well argued my friend. I'm with you in cowardice!!!!!
let's get this straight, the two AFL senior managers involved in the sex scandal resigned. Like hitler and his wife', they knew they were Guilty as all fukk and decided to get the hell out before they copped what was coming to em. you should be ashamed of urself nlol 
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
what was to defend, they were guilty of having a relationship. The question was what should the penalty be, if any. The AFL made a moral stand so they stood down. There were many who claimed their actions should not have resulted in any consequences, such as the NRL's own female staff member in charge of treatment of women.King-Eliagh wrote: Sat Dec 16, 2017 10:15 pmErrmmm
They'd be counting their lucky stars right now I tells ya! The proof is in their resignation. If they were innocent, why wouldn't they defend themselves, their livelihood, their status and all they'd worked for?
Nup, just like hitler they weren't up for defending emselves.
You can quote that dumbass lumby all ya like nlol, it doesn't change the smell.
For fukk sake! Another complaint and investigation underway. The article also highlights another AFL hq staffer resigned after leathlean and sim kiss six monthS back. And then the article also highlights, as AFL Ceo foresaw, lethlean has been welcomed back as head of an AFL football club. Let's not forget the tigers play who spread a topless photo of a women without her consent and then gets just three weeks rest as punishmentTerry wrote: Sun Dec 17, 2017 2:20 pmOMG it's on again!!!!!!!!! All fumbler folk here please do not REPEAT do not click on the link below. It is better to look away, block your ears, cover your eyes. What fun it must be being an AFL official!!!!!
https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/sport/ ... 05zn1.html
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Shame on KE?? Are you serious?? The AFL and it's supporters, yes you, are a stinking cesspit of cover up, double standards and tacit approval of abhorrent behavior.
Piss offTerry wrote: Sun Dec 17, 2017 5:19 pmShame on KE?? Are you serious?? The AFL and it's supporters, yes you, are a stinking cesspit of cover up, double standards and tacit approval of abhorrent behavior.
Exhibit A Simon Lethlean. Welcome back Slimey!!! He and St Kilda are a great fit. The club of Stephen Milne and players taking advantage of school girls they met while doing community programs. Yayyyyyyyyy. Go the Saints!!!!! Go AFL!!!
Wrong again pal!!!! Both are examples of cover ups, lies and distortions from head bodies. And YOU are part of the problem just like Catholic clergy who looked the other way.NlolRL wrote: Sun Dec 17, 2017 5:55 pmPiss offTerry wrote: Sun Dec 17, 2017 5:19 pmShame on KE?? Are you serious?? The AFL and it's supporters, yes you, are a stinking cesspit of cover up, double standards and tacit approval of abhorrent behavior.
Exhibit A Simon Lethlean. Welcome back Slimey!!! He and St Kilda are a great fit. The club of Stephen Milne and players taking advantage of school girls they met while doing community programs. Yayyyyyyyyy. Go the Saints!!!!! Go AFL!!!
he had a consensual relationship FFS, like thousands of other work relationships!! KE compared the AFL behaviour to the Catholic church and paedophilia, which is down right disgraceful and disrespectful to the many who have suffered at the hands of sexual abuse
