Page 10 of 83

Re: 2017 - Australian Football TV Ratings - AFL, AFL Womens etc (Rolling updates in OP)

Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:26 pm
by pussycat
NlolRL wrote: Sat Apr 29, 2017 10:31 am
Fri STV #NRL #FoxLeague #NRLCowboysEels National 252k: Metro 185k (Syd 109k Mel 14k Bri 46k Ade 4k Per 12k)
Fri STV #AFL #FoxFooty #AFLGiantsDogs National 326k: Metro 264k (Syd 24k Mel 138k Bri 25k Ade 35k Per 43k)

total for NRL last night: 951k
total for AFL last night: 1007k without regionals. Estimated total of 1234k (1/3rd metro)

So the direct comparison is now 7 -2 in favour of the AFL
You seem to have trouble grasping two relatively simple points. 1. Rugby league accumulate more ratings. 2.They do it from less matches.

The Southerners may have won some battles, great victories like bulls run and Chickamauga but in the end :rock: :rock: :rock:

Re: 2017 - Australian Football TV Ratings - AFL, AFL Womens etc (Rolling updates in OP)

Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 3:20 pm
by pussycat
The_Wookie wrote: Sat Apr 29, 2017 2:40 pm
pussycat wrote: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:26 pm
NlolRL wrote: Sat Apr 29, 2017 10:31 am
Fri STV #NRL #FoxLeague #NRLCowboysEels National 252k: Metro 185k (Syd 109k Mel 14k Bri 46k Ade 4k Per 12k)
Fri STV #AFL #FoxFooty #AFLGiantsDogs National 326k: Metro 264k (Syd 24k Mel 138k Bri 25k Ade 35k Per 43k)

total for NRL last night: 951k
total for AFL last night: 1007k without regionals. Estimated total of 1234k (1/3rd metro)

So the direct comparison is now 7 -2 in favour of the AFL
You seem to have trouble grasping two relatively simple points. 1. Rugby league accumulate more ratings. 2.They do it from less matches.

The Southerners may have won some battles, great victories like bulls run and Chickamauga but in the end :rock: :rock: :rock:
In the end, broadcasters paid more for the AFL. And have done consistently so since the 90s. How DOES that silver medal taste?
The broadcasters may have paid more but they paid more for less a heck of a lot less. Highlights which product is more valuable.

The true value may not be realised overnight but it will happen.

Re: 2017 - Australian Football TV Ratings - AFL, AFL Womens etc (Rolling updates in OP)

Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 4:37 pm
by NlolRL
pussycat wrote: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:26 pm
NlolRL wrote: Sat Apr 29, 2017 10:31 am
Fri STV #NRL #FoxLeague #NRLCowboysEels National 252k: Metro 185k (Syd 109k Mel 14k Bri 46k Ade 4k Per 12k)
Fri STV #AFL #FoxFooty #AFLGiantsDogs National 326k: Metro 264k (Syd 24k Mel 138k Bri 25k Ade 35k Per 43k)

total for NRL last night: 951k
total for AFL last night: 1007k without regionals. Estimated total of 1234k (1/3rd metro)

So the direct comparison is now 7 -2 in favour of the AFL
You seem to have trouble grasping two relatively simple points. 1. Rugby league accumulate more ratings. 2.They do it from less matches.

The Southerners may have won some battles, great victories like bulls run and Chickamauga but in the end :rock: :rock: :rock:
I've never denied point 1. Point 2 fails to account for scheduling differences. Fact is if the NRL was more popular on TV it wouldnt consistently get beaten in the direct FTA/STV comparison games

Re: 2017 - Australian Football TV Ratings - AFL, AFL Womens etc (Rolling updates in OP)

Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 5:53 pm
by SportFan
Wookie, just found the regional breakdown on social media, huge regional audience!

#AFLGiantsDogs (7 / 7mate affiliates - regional): 390k

•QLD: 40k
•N NSW: 25k
•S NSW: 70k
•VIC: 155k
•TAS: 55k
•WA: 45k

[Copyright RegTAM]

Re: 2017 - Australian Football TV Ratings - AFL, AFL Womens etc (Rolling updates in OP)

Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 6:46 pm
by AFLcrap1
Lol I wouldn't go with any official AFL spokesman .
They talk with fork tongue too many times

Re: 2017 - Australian Football TV Ratings - AFL, AFL Womens etc (Rolling updates in OP)

Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 7:31 pm
by SportFan
The_Wookie wrote: Sat Apr 29, 2017 5:54 pm
which social media account?

in any case gotta go with patrick keane on this one - as the AFL official spokesman hes the guy who would know and he called 1.207 million total this morning.
Yep, which means there was 200k regional (Seven affiliates).

And it appears correct, the social media account I viewed corrected it.

Surprisingly only 1k down from Anzac Day clash Seven regional!

Re: 2017 - Australian Football TV Ratings - AFL, AFL Womens etc (Rolling updates in OP)

Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2017 12:32 am
by SportFan
The_Wookie wrote: Sat Apr 29, 2017 9:51 pm
AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat Apr 29, 2017 6:46 pm
Lol I wouldn't go with any official AFL spokesman .
They talk with fork tongue too many times
I dont place any value on anything you say either.
LOL

AFL House's broadcasting team are in constant communication with Seven Sport (which is right next door in Docklands) & Fox Footy.

Game would have peaked close to 2m national (Seven + Fox)!

Re: 2017 - Australian Football TV Ratings - AFL, AFL Womens etc (Rolling updates in OP)

Posted: Mon May 01, 2017 10:28 am
by AFLcrap1
The_Wookie wrote: Sat Apr 29, 2017 9:51 pm
AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat Apr 29, 2017 6:46 pm
Lol I wouldn't go with any official AFL spokesman .
They talk with fork tongue too many times
I dont place any value on anything you say either.
:(/ :(/ :(/
Bit touchy are we
Can you show me where I've been caught out lying .
Can you show me where in the media I've been caught out lying .
I've posted plenty of examples of AFL officials lying through their teeth .

But let's just dismiss that . Because maybe they are telling the truth for a change .
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Re: 2017 - Australian Football TV Ratings - AFL, AFL Womens etc (Rolling updates in OP)

Posted: Mon May 01, 2017 10:30 am
by AFLcrap1
How's those hundreds of millions going that were spent on the northern states


Gee, that hundred million dollar northern expansion is really paying off...

Total local ratings for NSW & Qld AFL sides this week;

Suns 42k Bri (FTA 30k / STV 12k)
Lions 29k Bri (FTA 19k / STV 10k)
Swans 51k Syd (FTA 30k / STV 21k)
Giants 66k Syd (FTA 42k / STV 24k)

https://mobile.twitter.com/MediaweekAUS

Re: 2017 - Australian Football TV Ratings - AFL, AFL Womens etc (Rolling updates in OP)

Posted: Mon May 01, 2017 12:55 pm
by pussycat
Outside of the annual grant this is the additional funding the AFL gave to these expansion clubs in 2016

Brisbane Lions 8,144,434 m
Gold Coast Suns 7,806,106m
GWS Giants 12,159,886m
Sydney Swans 3,100,469m

This list doesn't include the millions they take out in bank loans.

Re: 2017 - Australian Football TV Ratings - AFL, AFL Womens etc (Rolling updates in OP)

Posted: Mon May 01, 2017 2:50 pm
by Fred
Yes but look at playing numbers !!

Re: 2017 - Australian Football TV Ratings - AFL, AFL Womens etc (Rolling updates in OP)

Posted: Mon May 01, 2017 4:32 pm
by AFLcrap1
Real numbers or the bullshit participation ones they put out

Re: 2017 - Australian Football TV Ratings - AFL, AFL Womens etc (Rolling updates in OP)

Posted: Mon May 01, 2017 5:21 pm
by pussycat
Fred wrote: Mon May 01, 2017 2:50 pm
Yes but look at playing numbers !!

The numbers I put up are totally outside the annual grant . they are handouts needed to keep afloat!

Other notable back holes were,

Melbourne , who received an extra $5.4m
North Melbourne $5.6m
St Kilda $9.2m
Western Bulldogs $8.2m

The total for additional handouts to all clubs was $86.8m

Re: 2017 - Australian Football TV Ratings - AFL, AFL Womens etc (Rolling updates in OP)

Posted: Mon May 01, 2017 6:50 pm
by NlolRL
pussycat wrote: Mon May 01, 2017 5:21 pm
Fred wrote: Mon May 01, 2017 2:50 pm
Yes but look at playing numbers !!

The numbers I put up are totally outside the annual grant . they are handouts needed to keep afloat!

Other notable back holes were,

Melbourne , who received an extra $5.4m
North Melbourne $5.6m
St Kilda $9.2m
Western Bulldogs $8.2m

The total for additional handouts to all clubs was $86.8m
whats your point exactly?

Re: 2017 - Australian Football TV Ratings - AFL, AFL Womens etc (Rolling updates in OP)

Posted: Tue May 02, 2017 9:48 pm
by pussycat
NlolRL wrote: Mon May 01, 2017 6:50 pm
pussycat wrote: Mon May 01, 2017 5:21 pm
Fred wrote: Mon May 01, 2017 2:50 pm
Yes but look at playing numbers !!

The numbers I put up are totally outside the annual grant . they are handouts needed to keep afloat!

Other notable back holes were,

Melbourne , who received an extra $5.4m
North Melbourne $5.6m
St Kilda $9.2m
Western Bulldogs $8.2m

The total for additional handouts to all clubs was $86.8m
whats your point exactly?

My point is, even with the money from crowds and membership half the clubs(at least) still lose money. That's despite clubs receiving there grant, additional handouts totalling $86.8million and probably a similar amount in personal loans. How is this even possible?