Page 10 of 15

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 9:10 am
by post_hoc
King-Eliagh wrote:
post_hoc wrote:
KE going batshit crazy, trawling the web for cropped images.

The abs data don't lie. Lol
:lol: No the ABS data don't lie, but you do you filthy mangy hound :lol:

while conducting some alternative business related research, I just noticed the glossary of defitions within the explanatory notes section and checked it up on your crumby analysis provided above. Check this lil ditty mah biatches! Yes wookie, you're also one of mah biatches :lol: and note the bolded sections ;)
Sports attendances

The question on sports attendance asked the respondent which sports (matches or competitions) they had been to as a spectator, during the previous 12 months. The respondent's own definition of sport was accepted. A sport was included regardless of whether the event was paid for or free of charge, or if it was attended at an overseas venue; but it was excluded if it was school or junior sport. A limit of 5 sports could be listed. Due to under-reporting of some sports (not always regarded as sports), specific questions were asked about attendance at motor sports, harness racing, horse races and dog races.
http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf ... num=&view=

and here we had both wookie and porkchop suggesting the abs data was referring solely and only to spectators attending FFA games. For shame on you chumps!!! [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X

Myth busted - you chumps suck - KE rules this joint so don't go up against him


:afro: :cheers: :afro:
What is your point? That explanation was I assume for all sports in the list?

And goes against exactly what one your nrl fan boys was having a whinge about, that it included mums at the kids weekend sports, which clearly it did not.

So what is your point exactly, how does that disagree with anything that has been said?

Once again you have been owned, you make up stories time and time again and the ABS data shows you are wrong, but hey keep having a sook, it is fun to watch

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 10:00 am
by King-Eliagh
Lordy lordy lordy porkchop, what's wrong with yer noggin?? :?>

Seriously, its clear as day I'm arguing about the professional leagues of both codes, I mean that's what the bloody fight club is about, its in the title. Additionally all the piccies I posted are of the codes at the prof level. Then you come in with some bullshit stats pretending that it refutes my assertion. Yet your stats refer to, and I quote
The respondent's own definition of sport was accepted. A sport was included regardless of whether the event was paid for or free of charge, or if it was attended at an overseas venue
:lol: You have utterly failed in your attempts to argue against me. You've provided no direct proof re NRL FFA or any other professional orgs crowds o/s :lol: but you and wook found some widdle abs stats which mean jack diddly in regards to my argument and you think you've got me :(/

I particularly like this lil gem from sydfc after his novice viewing of "the stats" :lol:
sydneyfc wrote:
i can hear ke breathing hard and smashing that keyboard already

close your eyes and take a deep breathe

as the stats surely proved.

there are more women at a-league games than nrl games - FACT. looks like that got settled very quick. its simple to see why women avoid going to nrl games. watching a bunch of boofheads run at eachother caveman style just doesn't do them any favors. obviously that can't represent all women...im sure at every nrl game you'll see a couple obese women that carry nicknames like"butch" and "bulldog" who absolutely love nrl. those are your true fans....:lol:
My oh my oh my. How wrong I've proven you all :_<> [-X :_<>

Pickup yer games novices.

:afro:

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 3:05 pm
by post_hoc
You do know the paid or free is in relation to the person attending, ie paid for the ticket or the ticket was free and not professional or amateur competitions. You do understand that don't you. The bit about o/s well that would have a huge impact surely.........not.

KE is clutching at straws, his lifelong mantra has been shown to be false and he is having trouble dealing with it, poor fella.

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 3:34 pm
by King-Eliagh
post_hoc wrote:
You do know the paid or free is in relation to the person attending, ie paid for the ticket or the ticket was free and not professional or amateur competitions. You do understand that don't you. The bit about o/s well that would have a huge impact surely.........not.

KE is clutching at straws, his lifelong mantra has been shown to be false and he is having trouble dealing with it, poor fella.
:lol: wow :shock: :shock: :shock: you're suggesting im the one clutching at straws? :_<>

you do understand that the definition of sport the ABS called for was up to "the interpretation" of the individual being questioned? You do know that the abs did not in their questioning qualify the actual soccer event (I.e FFA) in their question but rather left it to the women participants/spectators being questioned? Therefore included in the overall stats the abs developed we have numbers of women spectating at women's prof soccer matches, a men's prof soccer matches, womens or men's amateur matches, womens or mens representative matches, friendly internationals, a soccer game down the local park between their drunk fat hubbys after a bbq :lol: etc etc etc and all of these same type matches o/s as well as in australia. It's a lil more all encompassing than the friggin a-league pal :lol:

Your stats provided are hopeless! :(/ They simply cant and don't negate my argument one iota. My pics are pretty revealing tho. Do you want some more?

Pickup yer game porkychoppy :wink:

:>::

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 3:47 pm
by AFLcrap1
& the weekly hooligan show that is the Lol league ,just keeps producing the hits .

FFA to review tapes of AAMI Park crowd
Ben McKay, AAP March 9, 2015, 6:17 pm

Football Federation Australia officials are reviewing closed-circuit footage of A-League fans throwing bottles at a referee in an unsavoury end to the weekend's matches.

A highly contentious goal to Perth Glory's Andy Keogh against Melbourne Victory on Saturday night sparked ugly scenes both on and off the pitch.

Keogh's goal was judged legal by the referees, despite the Irishman appearing to stray forward of last man Besart Berisha.

Offside or otherwise, a big-screen replay shown to the 22,525-strong AAMI Park crowd threw both fans and players into a frenzy.

Victory players remonstrated with the assistant referee, with Fahid Ben Khalfallah booked for his part, as plastic bottles landed around the linesman from the crowd.

An FFA spokesman confirmed on Monday the incident would be reviewed with punishments heading the way of any offenders.

"FFA is investigating the incident at AAMI Park on Saturday night when projectiles were thrown on to the pitch," the statement read.

"If offenders can be identified through the AAMI Park closed circuit TV or the event and security reports, FFA will impose bans on those responsible."

In his post-match interview, Glory coach Andy Keogh suggested it was irresponsible to replay the "probably offside" goal.

"I don't think that's a good thing to show on the big screens at the games," he said.

Victory coach Kevin Muscat said he did his best to play peacemaker.

"Understandably the players were annoyed and we were trying to calm them down," he said.

The match ended 1-1 after Daniel Georgievski scored a fine second-half equaliser.

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 7:16 pm
by King-Eliagh
:lol: thanks for the update aflcrap. Women don't like this childish shit.

:(/

And wookie, it's about time you get back in here and apologise for posting that shitty lil graph you made to support porkchop. It was way outtA context, outta line, outta the equation and misleading to our members. [-X as a moderator me and beaussie expect you do better mate. [-X

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 7:55 pm
by King-Eliagh
Oi don't you dare take that cranky pants attitude with me sonny jim! Now listen, ur wanky graph has been proven to be irrelevant by my effective and spot on analysis of the abs stats. The least you should be doing is admitting you were on the wrong side of right in your ill informed post.

Now If you wanna continue being my modbitch I suggest you improve your attitude and ur relevance pronto [-X

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 8:23 pm
by King-Eliagh
The_Wookie wrote:
Fuck off KE. I couldnt give a shit what you think.
Oi, you listen to me now. For starters, cut the fukkin swearing out. You're a fukkin modbitch and should act a bit more collegially ok :thumbleft:

And secondly, as I've said before, you've shown you care what I think so many times b4 yA incorrect assswipe! You've supported my policies, rules, posts, and copied/plagiarised my policy suggestions, deleted posts and locked threads on my advise. So stop lying to all and sundry and show some respect for your tf elder and intellectual superior/moi for a change yA sllllllluuuuuuuuuut!

Apart from that you're goin ok bro. :>::

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 10:12 pm
by AFLcrap1
Lol

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 9:08 am
by post_hoc
King-Eliagh wrote:
post_hoc wrote:
You do know the paid or free is in relation to the person attending, ie paid for the ticket or the ticket was free and not professional or amateur competitions. You do understand that don't you. The bit about o/s well that would have a huge impact surely.........not.

KE is clutching at straws, his lifelong mantra has been shown to be false and he is having trouble dealing with it, poor fella.
:lol: wow :shock: :shock: :shock: you're suggesting im the one clutching at straws? :_<>

you do understand that the definition of sport the ABS called for was up to "the interpretation" of the individual being questioned? You do know that the abs did not in their questioning qualify the actual soccer event (I.e FFA) in their question but rather left it to the women participants/spectators being questioned? Therefore included in the overall stats the abs developed we have numbers of women spectating at women's prof soccer matches, a men's prof soccer matches, womens or men's amateur matches, womens or mens representative matches, friendly internationals, a soccer game down the local park between their drunk fat hubbys after a bbq :lol: etc etc etc and all of these same type matches o/s as well as in australia. It's a lil more all encompassing than the friggin a-league pal :lol:

Your stats provided are hopeless! :(/ They simply cant and don't negate my argument one iota. My pics are pretty revealing tho. Do you want some more?

Pickup yer game porkychoppy :wink:

:>::
of course all of those hold true for the stats associated with Rugby League, except of course the women's rugby League game, because to a rugby league fan women should only be there to bash, perv or get them beer, how dare they play sport.

KE keep clutching those straws baby, it is all you have, the data is in, your lifelong mantra has been shown to be once again a figment of your degraded brain.

toodles

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 11:05 am
by King-Eliagh
toodles bro. thanks for providing a laughing stock. my data is directly on the money. sure its not the actual numbers/%'s of the pro codes but man, systematically syphoning through the images shows us there's big problems with ffa female attendance and I've no doubt its because of the hooly holligans, as well as the lowly behaviour of the men on the pitch.

Perhaps if you wanna try argue against me you could look up whether ffa has some stats around spectators gender? If I can help lead and direct your research in any other way so you don't go way off the point again please lemme know bro :)

toodles :lol:

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 11:06 am
by King-Eliagh
Wookie that last sentence goes for you too my man ;)

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 12:27 pm
by post_hoc
KE, poor old fool thinks cropped photo's are data. Sorry mate the only data that has been shown as been the ABS and they show you to making stuff up again.

Now go and get some real data and not made up lies, like a good gopher

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 12:37 pm
by King-Eliagh
:lol: ^^^ said "toodles" but comes back for more because of realisation that he's copping a pounding and cant go out like that :lol:

the pics haven't been cropped my ill informed gosling, as I said earlier they're the first ones which come up on google images :D

Your data is completely irrelevant to the topic at hand! As proven by....wait for it....MOI! :(/

... :(/

You out now? Is it "toodles" yet? Or you want some more? :_<> :\: :_<>

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 12:43 pm
by post_hoc
btw not data but because you are too dumb to know the difference

[URL=http://s1382.photobucket.com/user/ ... .jpg[/img][/url]

Image

plenty there, so pretty much your "data" is wrong which ever way you look at it LOL

So KE what is your excuse now