What is your point? That explanation was I assume for all sports in the list?King-Eliagh wrote:post_hoc wrote:KE going batshit crazy, trawling the web for cropped images.
The abs data don't lie. LolNo the ABS data don't lie, but you do you filthy mangy hound
while conducting some alternative business related research, I just noticed the glossary of defitions within the explanatory notes section and checked it up on your crumby analysis provided above. Check this lil ditty mah biatches! Yes wookie, you're also one of mah biatchesand note the bolded sections
http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf ... num=&view=Sports attendances
The question on sports attendance asked the respondent which sports (matches or competitions) they had been to as a spectator, during the previous 12 months. The respondent's own definition of sport was accepted. A sport was included regardless of whether the event was paid for or free of charge, or if it was attended at an overseas venue; but it was excluded if it was school or junior sport. A limit of 5 sports could be listed. Due to under-reporting of some sports (not always regarded as sports), specific questions were asked about attendance at motor sports, harness racing, horse races and dog races.
and here we had both wookie and porkchop suggesting the abs data was referring solely and only to spectators attending FFA games. For shame on you chumps!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Myth busted - you chumps suck - KE rules this joint so don't go up against him
![]()
![]()
And goes against exactly what one your nrl fan boys was having a whinge about, that it included mums at the kids weekend sports, which clearly it did not.
So what is your point exactly, how does that disagree with anything that has been said?
Once again you have been owned, you make up stories time and time again and the ABS data shows you are wrong, but hey keep having a sook, it is fun to watch