Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

& why would any Swans fan get Pay TV to watch them when they have been on FTA for 25+ yrs.

This bullshit about High pay tv figures for AFL in SYD is all crap.

Syd has a high % of AUS pay tv customers because of RL.

There was an article after the 1st yr of the AFL media dea which stated that the uptake for pay tv was poor ...only 20K new subscriptions for the yr.

& you can bet most of them wouldn't have been in SYD.

Their foxtel ratings would be 30k or so. Their FTA ratings around 40-60k.

Leaves the storm for dead.

13 to 20K for pay .. end of

the Storm are hitting around 60K when they're on FTA in Melbourne after just 2 years of regular broadcasts dipshit
& those numbers are growing
the Swines aren't doing any better then that ... after 30 years

says it all really

60k.... :_<>

storm owning the swines after 2 years
yep it is funny isn't it :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

What's funny is how much you make up, Dave! 60K? Bullshit.

Xman wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Soooooo, how are the swines memberships going, reach their Sydney TV ratings yet, or did they pass them when they hit 20k?

Far better than any NRL team, but thanks for asking

Doesn't seem to help them much eh?

Helps the NRL clubs even less, ParraEel!

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Helps the NRL clubs even less, ParraEel!

hmmmm

NRL rates its tits off in Sydney & elsewhere
broadcasters pay the NRL 260 Million a year as a result of this

the NRL distributes 112 million of this each year to its clubs

but yeah
it helps them even less



>


:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

jesus
you are a troll aren't you
you'd have to be

you are too fucking stupid to be real :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Dave! 60K? Bullshit.

a bet cockhead ?

if & when you finally find your testicles
you know where I am

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Dave! 60K? Bullshit.

a bet cockhead ?

if & when you finally find your testicles
you know where I am

A one off. They had plenty of ratings in the low 20s with no concurrent foxtel ratings

I'm still waiting for Dave to take my bet ... Maybe when he finds his balls lol hypocritical fool he is

Phelpsy wrote:

I'm still waiting for Dave to take my bet ... Maybe when he finds his balls lol hypocritical fool he is

when NRL crapper agrees to mine first shithead

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Dave! 60K? Bullshit.

a bet cockhead ?

if & when you finally find your testicles
you know where I am

A one off. They had plenty of ratings in the low 20s with no concurrent foxtel ratings

ah ... no wanker

those were NRL games not involving the Storm on FTA in Melbourne
the FTA games the Storm played rated much ... much higher then that .... averaging 60K for 2013
about as well as the Swines did in Sydney with pay added

that's with both sides the defending premiers
but... after just 2 years of regular broadcasts for the Storm In Melbourne .... compared to 30 years for the Swines in Sydney

wow
just wow :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Dave! 60K? Bullshit.

a bet cockhead ?

if & when you finally find your testicles
you know where I am

A one off. They had plenty of ratings in the low 20s with no concurrent foxtel ratings

ah ... no wanker

those were NRL games not involving the Storm on FTA in Melbourne
the FTA games the Storm played rated much ... much higher then that .... averaging 60K for 2013
about as well as the Swines did in Sydney with pay added

that's with both sides the defending premiers
but... after just 2 years of regular broadcasts for the Storm In Melbourne .... compared to 30 years for the Swines in Sydney

wow
just wow :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Jeeps youre a liar

viewtopic.php?f=43&t=3759

This thread shows some of the swans ratings, without foxtel, were 65,57,70, 95....the Stom werent near this on average, let alone adding foxtel

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Dave! 60K? Bullshit.

a bet cockhead ?

if & when you finally find your testicles
you know where I am

A one off. They had plenty of ratings in the low 20s with no concurrent foxtel ratings

ah ... no wanker

those were NRL games not involving the Storm on FTA in Melbourne
the FTA games the Storm played rated much ... much higher then that .... averaging 60K for 2013
about as well as the Swines did in Sydney with pay added

that's with both sides the defending premiers
but... after just 2 years of regular broadcasts for the Storm In Melbourne .... compared to 30 years for the Swines in Sydney

wow
just wow :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Jeeps youre a liar

viewtopic.php?f=43&t=3759

This thread shows some of the swans ratings, without foxtel, were 65,57,70, 95....the Stom werent near this on average, let alone adding foxtel

jeeps you're a wanker :_<> :_<> :_<>

4 above 60K
& 18 well below it ... even with pay :_<> :_<> :_<>
& doesn't even show any Storm ratings you complete dick

when will the lies stop with fumblers

It didn't show any Storm ratings because they missed the cut, doofus!! It was THAT low!

You show me an average 60K rating for the Storm, and I'll take a week off here. If you can't or won't within 24 hours of this comment YOU take the week off here!

Agreed?

(This'll be good!)

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Dave! 60K? Bullshit.

a bet cockhead ?

if & when you finally find your testicles
you know where I am

A one off. They had plenty of ratings in the low 20s with no concurrent foxtel ratings

ah ... no wanker

those were NRL games not involving the Storm on FTA in Melbourne
the FTA games the Storm played rated much ... much higher then that .... averaging 60K for 2013
about as well as the Swines did in Sydney with pay added

that's with both sides the defending premiers
but... after just 2 years of regular broadcasts for the Storm In Melbourne .... compared to 30 years for the Swines in Sydney

wow
just wow :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Jeeps youre a liar

viewtopic.php?f=43&t=3759

This thread shows some of the swans ratings, without foxtel, were 65,57,70, 95....the Stom werent near this on average, let alone adding foxtel

jeeps you're a wanker :_<> :_<> :_<>

4 above 60K
& 18 well below it ... even with pay :_<> :_<> :_<>
& doesn't even show any Storm ratings you complete dick

when will the lies stop with fumblers

More raiderdave denial. They were the figures shown in the thread, which had nothing to do with an argument about the swans, so the sample was random.

Where are these storm ratings?

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Dave! 60K? Bullshit.

a bet cockhead ?

if & when you finally find your testicles
you know where I am

A one off. They had plenty of ratings in the low 20s with no concurrent foxtel ratings

ah ... no wanker

those were NRL games not involving the Storm on FTA in Melbourne
the FTA games the Storm played rated much ... much higher then that .... averaging 60K for 2013
about as well as the Swines did in Sydney with pay added

that's with both sides the defending premiers
but... after just 2 years of regular broadcasts for the Storm In Melbourne .... compared to 30 years for the Swines in Sydney

wow
just wow :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

5th July 2013 Storm v Broncos @MediaweekAUS: Fri TV #NRL Nine 601k (Syd 354k Bri 247k) GEM 33k (Mel 25k Ade 3k Per 6k)

Oh dear, 25k, and no foxtel simulcast! :_<>