Page 10 of 10
Re: Rnd 1 VFL in Sydney & no
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 11:03 pm
by Xman
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Vatmans club now run by the biggest gimp to ever grace ozzy Tv 1
Izzy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gone, yep thats 2 (even Carro agrees with this one'
)
The Brions are bleeding money left right and centre makes it 3.
The swinnies from Sydney are doing it tough even though they just won the (flag
) Premiership making it 4.
The Gold Coast Gazza's would be 5, they're pitiful, but not GWS pitiful (yet
)
You could probably add Australia's biggest whore to the list as well in sporting terms, they're always looking for a bit of cash, so make it 6 and put down the Not North Melbourne/West Sydney/Canberra/ACT/Gold Coast/Tasmania Kangawhoos.
Tell me Xman, how much money does it cost to prop just those 6 clubs up a year including of all the little goodies 4 of the clubs have received over the various years and the funding that goes into these places underneath?
Again, AFL clubs on average make 2-3 times NRL clubs. Revenue is no issue at all. Reducing operational expenses will be the AFLs next aim. Most teams have a luxury of support staff and are only trying to compete with the larger AFL clubs like Collingwood, Essendon and the eagles. It has nothing to do with not enough money to run clubs.
Re: Rnd 1 VFL in Sydney & no
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 1:53 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Costs them more to run.
Silly silly boy.
Re: Rnd 1 VFL in Sydney & no
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 7:27 pm
by Xman
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Costs them more to run.
Silly silly boy.
The minimum cost would be a bit more. They chose to spend the rest because they're bigger, wealthier, better resourced, and more professional
Re: Rnd 1 VFL in Sydney & no
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 8:35 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Really, or is it because their lists are bigger because every team has more players to begin with?
Don't bullshit a bullshitter
Re: Rnd 1 VFL in Sydney & no
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:55 am
by Xman
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Really, or is it because their lists are bigger because every team has more players to begin with?
Don't bullshit a bullshitter
As I said, the minimum cost wouldn't be that much more.say they had 20 extra players on 200k each. That's an extra 4 mil.
Whoopie do...
The rest of their costs are all support staff, facilities etc..
Re: Rnd 1 VFL in Sydney & no
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 8:26 am
by Stewie
Xman wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:Really, or is it because their lists are bigger because every team has more players to begin with?
Don't bullshit a bullshitter
As I said, the minimum cost wouldn't be that much more.say they had 20 extra players on 200k each. That's an extra 4 mil.
Whoopie do...
The rest of their costs are all support staff, facilities etc..
$4 million is a big deal in the nRL, X.
Re: Rnd 1 VFL in Sydney & no
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 2:23 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Bahahahaha, stupid sport has more coaches in the box than players on the pitch
Thick morons.
Re: Rnd 1 VFL in Sydney & no
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 3:35 pm
by Stewie
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Bahahahaha, stupid sport has more coaches in the box than players on the pitch
Thick morons.
Melbourne coach Craig Belamy said on AFL Insight how much more professional the coaching was in the AFL compared to the nRL, which still has coaching staff that are part time.
Re: Rnd 1 VFL in Sydney & no
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 4:03 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Re: Rnd 1 VFL in Sydney & no
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 4:11 pm
by Stewie
Lol you stupid delusional ******. Roy Masters also lives there and do you see him pumping up the AFL. Any comment on the nRL still having part time coaching staff?
Re: Rnd 1 VFL in Sydney & no
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:41 pm
by Xman
But but but!
Re: Rnd 1 VFL in Sydney & no
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:27 am
by Striker
Xman wrote:Striker wrote:Xman wrote:
Ahh no, keeping a player who can't play would be far worse. He paid for his wage in the first few months.
And the loss will be far bigger now he's gone! What, couldn't you AFLers train him? Isn't your training good enough?
Really? How do you take media attention away?
You still don't get the red line of negative publicity do you, X?