Talking Footy

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Bigger crowd than any international AFL match and at only 9,000, what's that say about your code?

Are you quite clear on that , because that's absolute bs and I challenging you.

What are you challenging about dopey?

Well?

He's challenging you on the claim that there has never been an AFL crowd outside of Australia at more than 9,000. Clarify?

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

See that Youtube vid of the axemen above?

Now compare that to this USA vs Canada AFL international.

Those pics are how old? Look like early 80s.

Beaussie wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

See that Youtube vid of the axemen above?

Now compare that to this USA vs Canada AFL international.

Those pics are how old? Look like early 80s.

you wouldn't expect anything else from parafeel.

NSWAFL wrote:

He's challenging you on the claim that there has never been an AFL crowd outside of Australia at more than 9,000. Clarify?

AFL don't play internationals dopey, so how can they have a bigger crowd?

Who have Australia played in an international?

Really, those pics aren't very old at all.

BS artists.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

He's challenging you on the claim that there has never been an AFL crowd outside of Australia at more than 9,000. Clarify?

AFL don't play internationals dopey, so how can they have a bigger crowd?

Who have Australia played in an international?

Careful! The way you said it before was open to an alternative interpretation. You've already been burned twice in the BS file on that issue of context!

DOES THE AUSTRALIAN AFL SIDE PLAY INTERNATIONALS AGAINST ANYONE IN THE 4 AND TWENTY MEAT PIE CUP?

There's no such cup.

Who do the ALL Australian team play, you know, the fumbliest of the fumblers for the year sponsored by 4 and Twenty meat pies?

No such sponsor.

NSWAFL wrote:

No such sponsor.

Here, instead of making another BS file, I'll just post it now.

That's not a competitive team. That is simply a best of. So it doesn't count and my statement that there is no such sponsor for a MATCH is valid (clarification added).