Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

60 less games for the year but still won by 10m =D> =D>

yes

123 Million is more then 134 Million

hmmmmm

no its 11 million less

AFL v NRL, not AR's v RL

meh... your sport is 2nd
& anyway
RL's rep games are played by NRL players .....& just the same way your sport is being called VFL by all n sundry

ours is also going down that path & being called NRL by everyone

games involving VFL players were watched by 123 Million people on TV in Australia last year
games involving NRL players were watched by 134 Million people on TV in Australia last year

end of

Wrong. The AFL was 123M without the preseason cup or state comps. Not to mention this 123m is for 27hrs viewing a week, not 16hrs like the nRL

Xman wrote:

Wrong. The AFL was 123M without the preseason cup or state comps. Not to mention this 123m is for 27hrs viewing a week, not 16hrs like the nRL

the KNOB cup was included you **** half wit
& feel free to add the vicky kicky state cups that hardly no one watches

we'll add the Holden cup to ours .... 45K a game X 78 games & 500K watching its GF
NSW & QLD state cups

the ESL ....


& our lead pushes out to about 15 Million

Not to mention this 123m is for 27hrs viewing a week, not 16hrs like the nRL

oh
so this would of meant you could sell a lot more advertising to merchants during broadcasts then the NRL could
meaning your coverage would be worth a lot more then ours ...... right ?







this is just piss funny

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Wrong. The AFL was 123M without the preseason cup or state comps. Not to mention this 123m is for 27hrs viewing a week, not 16hrs like the nRL

the KNOB cup was included you **** half wit
& feel free to add the vicky kicky state cups that hardly no one watches

we'll add the Holden cup to ours .... 45K a game X 78 games & 500K watching its GF
NSW & QLD state cups

the ESL ....


& our lead pushes out to about 15 Million

Not to mention this 123m is for 27hrs viewing a week, not 16hrs like the nRL

oh
so this would of meant you could sell a lot more advertising to merchants during broadcasts then the NRL could
meaning your coverage would be worth a lot more then ours ...... right ?







this is just piss funny

Prove it was included.....

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Wrong. The AFL was 123M without the preseason cup or state comps. Not to mention this 123m is for 27hrs viewing a week, not 16hrs like the nRL

the KNOB cup was included you **** half wit
& feel free to add the vicky kicky state cups that hardly no one watches

we'll add the Holden cup to ours .... 45K a game X 78 games & 500K watching its GF
NSW & QLD state cups

the ESL ....


& our lead pushes out to about 15 Million

Not to mention this 123m is for 27hrs viewing a week, not 16hrs like the nRL

oh
so this would of meant you could sell a lot more advertising to merchants during broadcasts then the NRL could
meaning your coverage would be worth a lot more then ours ...... right ?







this is just piss funny

Prove it was included.....

prove it wasn't ?

You do concede RD that swans membership numbers are pretty good though ?

I think if you had a list of Key Performance Indicators for the year you would tick off membership. On feild success ticked of from last year. Tv ratings ... I think maintaining them at last years levels would be a short term goal ( not sure if they did this) but a 5 year kpi would be to increase them to maybe 100 000 for 90 percent by end if current broadcast deal. Work needed there . Crowds ? Well what would be reasonable ... Given the average over past 16 years is 30000 roughly it would need to be higher than that and coming off a premiership you would be aiming at maybe 35000 .. However redevelopment of scg and having to play gws twice you would tweak this down to maintaining last years ... Although if on ground success remains I think 33 is Reasonable ... Although I haven't looked at draw to be honest .

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

the KNOB cup was included you **** half wit
& feel free to add the vicky kicky state cups that hardly no one watches

we'll add the Holden cup to ours .... 45K a game X 78 games & 500K watching its GF
NSW & QLD state cups

the ESL ....


& our lead pushes out to about 15 Million


oh
so this would of meant you could sell a lot more advertising to merchants during broadcasts then the NRL could
meaning your coverage would be worth a lot more then ours ...... right ?







this is just piss funny

Prove it was included.....

prove it wasn't ?

Don't need to. The article showed the AFL won the ratings for the year. It didn't specify whether comps outside the regular season like SOO or preseason cup were included.

Port Adelaide this time last year compared to now.
(12 April, 2012) - 35,287
(11 April, 2013) – 36,500 +1213

Stewie wrote:

Port Adelaide this time last year compared to now.
(12 April, 2012) - 35,287
(11 April, 2013) – 36,500 +1213

Hopefully the derby is packed this weekend. Imagine what it will be like next year at the new upgraded Adelaide oval.

piesman2011 wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Port Adelaide this time last year compared to now.
(12 April, 2012) - 35,287
(11 April, 2013) – 36,500 +1213

Hopefully the derby is packed this weekend. Imagine what it will be like next year at the new upgraded Adelaide oval.

Bit of rain forecast so that will keep some away unfortunately. A Sunday twilight timeslot doesn't help either, but I'm hopeful of 40k.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Prove it was included.....

prove it wasn't ?

Don't need to. The article showed the AFL won the ratings for the year. It didn't specify whether comps outside the regular season like SOO or preseason cup were included.

the VFL were smashed by rugby league ...134 Mill to 123 Mill
it included all games played by NRL or VFL players
end of

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

prove it wasn't ?

Don't need to. The article showed the AFL won the ratings for the year. It didn't specify whether comps outside the regular season like SOO or preseason cup were included.

the VFL were smashed by rugby league ...134 Mill to 123 Mill
it included all games played by NRL or VFL players
end of

Sport v comp = apples v oranges.

Comp v comp = apples v apples and a big victory to the AFL.

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

prove it wasn't ?

Don't need to. The article showed the AFL won the ratings for the year. It didn't specify whether comps outside the regular season like SOO or preseason cup were included.

the VFL were smashed by rugby league ...134 Mill to 123 Mill
it included all games played by NRL or VFL players
end of

Well no it wouldn't. AFL players play in the VFL, SAFL, wafl, replays on fox footy etc....

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Don't need to. The article showed the AFL won the ratings for the year. It didn't specify whether comps outside the regular season like SOO or preseason cup were included.

the VFL were smashed by rugby league ...134 Mill to 123 Mill
it included all games played by NRL or VFL players
end of

Sport v comp = apples v oranges.

Comp v comp = apples v apples and a big victory to the AFL.

sport V sport
its about 140 mill to 130 mill

you are 2nd biggest
deal with it