Talking Footy

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

I'm off to baseball today . We usually get 1 or 2 watching ....

you'd be used to that
being a Thuns fan ....

Rich coming from the guy who's a fan of the lowest supported team in the AFL and nRL combined!

when the fudging factor is removed

its
Thuns 2nd last
Midgets last

by some way cockhead

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

you'd be used to that
being a Thuns fan ....

Rich coming from the guy who's a fan of the lowest supported team in the AFL and nRL combined!

when the fudging factor is removed

its
Thuns 2nd last
Midgets last

by some way cockhead

The only code that's ever fudged and has been caught numerous times and even admitted it is the nRL.

arse Raiders... dead last.

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Rich coming from the guy who's a fan of the lowest supported team in the AFL and nRL combined!

when the fudging factor is removed

its
Thuns 2nd last
Midgets last

by some way cockhead

The only code that's ever fudged and has been caught numerous times and even admitted it is the nRL.

arse Raiders... dead last.

so just because you aren't caught .. means you don't do it ?



your eyes
are they painted on .....

Fudgers PTY LTD
Office locations
Western Sydney
Gold Coast

Just because you say they do though Dave due to your cognitive dissonance does actually make it true. But I understand you probably do believe it is true otherwise it challenges beliefs you have invested so strongly in . I get that.

Phelpsy wrote:

Just because you say they do though Dave due to your cognitive dissonance does actually make it true. But I understand you probably do believe it is true otherwise it challenges beliefs you have invested so strongly in . I get that.

I guess you could call Raiderdave a lose cause.

Phelpsy wrote:

Just because you say they do though Dave due to your cognitive dissonance does actually make it true. But I understand you probably do believe it is true otherwise it challenges beliefs you have invested so strongly in . I get that.

my eyes work

end of

Stewie wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Just because you say they do though Dave due to your cognitive dissonance does actually make it true. But I understand you probably do believe it is true otherwise it challenges beliefs you have invested so strongly in . I get that.

I guess you could call Raiderdave a lose cause.

I guess we could call you ... a cockhead

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Just because you say they do though Dave due to your cognitive dissonance does actually make it true. But I understand you probably do believe it is true otherwise it challenges beliefs you have invested so strongly in . I get that.

my eyes work

end of

They work in their own dysfunctional way thats for sure

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Just because you say they do though Dave due to your cognitive dissonance does actually make it true. But I understand you probably do believe it is true otherwise it challenges beliefs you have invested so strongly in . I get that.

my eyes work

end of

They work in their own dysfunctional way thats for sure

the sad fact is neither AFL or NRL are the number one code in australia as neither are truely national.

214Four wrote:

the sad fact is neither AFL or NRL are the number one code in australia as neither are truely national.

2 teams in each mainland state, games in every state or territory and every capital city for premiership points, I'd say the AFL is the most national league of them all by a long margin.

Stewie wrote:

214Four wrote:

the sad fact is neither AFL or NRL are the number one code in australia as neither are truely national.

2 teams in each mainland state, games in every state or territory and every capital city for premiership points, I'd say the AFL is the most national league of them all by a long margin.

yeah but two of those states is no more than of a shoe string significance. In nsw AFL is easily sitting 4th out of the 4 biggest codes (RL,Union,Soccer,AFL) and i would say in QLD their 3rd

In Gold Coast clearly second . Maybe Brisbane equal second ... Rest of much if state would say second .

The AFL is missing teams in places like regional Qld (say far north Qld), Canberra, Tasmania, NT and Regional NSW (say central coast or Newcastle) However they play 3 games in canberra and 6 games in Tasmania which some what makes up for that. You could probabaly say that probabaly 5 million Aussies dont have an AFL team in their area. Prehaps you could say 4 million if you remove canberra, tassie and southern NSW because they have a team who plays there a bit.
RL doesnt really have a team in SA, WA, tassie, NT or even regional vic to some extent. So thats probabaly 5.5 million to 4.5 million if you say the Storm represent regional Vic. So in the end you could say that both the NRL and the AFL have similar amounts of representation in terms of population.
Some would claim that the AFL have the 2 Qld teams and 2 NSW teams to represent Qld and NSW but im sure that there are many Qld and NSW people who would disagree with this statement.

Stewie wrote:

214Four wrote:

the sad fact is neither AFL or NRL are the number one code in australia as neither are truely national.

2 teams in each mainland state, games in every state or territory and every capital city for premiership points, I'd say the AFL is the most national league of them all by a long margin.

a frogs crap is what most people in NSW.. the ACT & QLD .. couldn't give about vicky kicky

if you are irrelevant in one half of a nation
you are NOT .. national

end of