Talking Footy

Raiderdave wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

i know what you ment you thick fuck stick
at 6.30pm the game was up against a pretty busy time on FTA with all the heavy weight ratings shows up against it .... thats why it only attracted 200K you jibbering tool

a bunch of big faties trying to loose weight, for inspiration for your self!

and yr mum....

pretty sad when your best come back is a yr mum joke (ps its spelt "your")
but never the less im sure she wouldn't go for a flannelet, three tooth , mullet wearing bogan, such as your self

Saw this on LU =D>

I am a fan of a fixed schedule, the WAY it was done is what I objected to. The NRL/ARLC allowed Ch9 to completely hijack the implementation process and a result, there's always going to be a handful of teams that get screwed over in a big way

Such as the Raiders and Cronulla.

adamj1300 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

a bunch of big faties trying to loose weight, for inspiration for your self!

and yr mum....

pretty sad when your best come back is a yr mum joke (ps its spelt "your")
but never the less im sure she wouldn't go for a flannelet, three tooth , mullet wearing bogan, such as your self

spelt your is it ?

have a closer look you gimp ...

Stewie wrote:

Saw this on LU =D>

I am a fan of a fixed schedule, the WAY it was done is what I objected to. The NRL/ARLC allowed Ch9 to completely hijack the implementation process and a result, there's always going to be a handful of teams that get screwed over in a big way

Such as the Raiders and Cronulla.

yes its impacting on the Raiders bottom line isn't it
oh wait a sec ..

they aren't run by a pack of numerically inept ********* .. like Port Porkedmemum

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Saw this on LU =D>

I am a fan of a fixed schedule, the WAY it was done is what I objected to. The NRL/ARLC allowed Ch9 to completely hijack the implementation process and a result, there's always going to be a handful of teams that get screwed over in a big way

Such as the Raiders and Cronulla.

yes its impacting on the Raiders bottom line isn't it
oh wait a sec ..

they aren't run by a pack of numerically inept ********* .. like Port Porkedmemum

Why is the nRL ignoring the Raiders Dave? I thought they made the finals, don't they deserve some FTA exposure? The nRL... sell outs

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Saw this on LU =D>

I am a fan of a fixed schedule, the WAY it was done is what I objected to. The NRL/ARLC allowed Ch9 to completely hijack the implementation process and a result, there's always going to be a handful of teams that get screwed over in a big way

Such as the Raiders and Cronulla.

yes its impacting on the Raiders bottom line isn't it
oh wait a sec ..

they aren't run by a pack of numerically inept ********* .. like Port Porkedmemum

Yes it is. You have less exposure and are getting less sponsorship because of it. Less potential fans know about the Raiders and this results in less money, resulting in it hurting your bottom line. You idiot.

Raiderdave there's only one idiot........you! You are such a wanker!

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave there's only one idiot........you! You are such a wanker!

You fit that description pretty well to I must say

Do you ever have a point Wabbit? Your like that slightly autistic cousin that stands behinds people having an argument occasionally chiming in with a "yeah" or a "thats right" convincing yourself you've fully engaged in a verbal stoush and been triumphant. Wabbit grown ups are talking run away and play with ur blow up man doll! You wabbit hole stuffing ***.

I'm off to baseball today . We usually get 1 or 2 watching ... But if we get 4 that's 100 percent growth. I will then claim that baseball is the superior sport over nrl and AFL given our growth of 100 percent .

Phelpsy wrote:

I'm off to baseball today . We usually get 1 or 2 watching ... But if we get 4 that's 100 percent growth. I will then claim that baseball is the superior sport over nrl and AFL given our growth of 100 percent .

You truly are a Raiderdave disciple

piesman2011 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Saw this on LU =D>
Such as the Raiders and Cronulla.

yes its impacting on the Raiders bottom line isn't it
oh wait a sec ..

they aren't run by a pack of numerically inept ********* .. like Port Porkedmemum

Yes it is. You have less exposure and are getting less sponsorship because of it. Less potential fans know about the Raiders and this results in less money, resulting in it hurting your bottom line. You idiot.

hmmmmm
gee

lucky they are one of the best run sporting organisations financially in the land then eh dickhead

Phelpsy wrote:

I'm off to baseball today . We usually get 1 or 2 watching ....

you'd be used to that
being a Thuns fan ....

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

I'm off to baseball today . We usually get 1 or 2 watching ....

you'd be used to that
being a Thuns fan ....

Rich coming from the guy who's a fan of the lowest supported team in the AFL and nRL combined!

Actually I'm a pies fan lol