Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 4:36 pm
85 pages and still sweet F/A Raiderdave. We're waiting...
www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
Stewie wrote:85 pages and still sweet F/A Raiderdave. We're waiting...
Why would they include another seperate competition in the final tally?Raiderdave wrote:prove otherwise ***********Xman wrote:prove it dickheadRaiderdave wrote:it is a VFL comp , played by VFL players
it is included
VFL ... numb 2
What separate competition?Xman wrote:Why would they include another seperate competition in the final tally?Raiderdave wrote:prove otherwise ***********Xman wrote:prove it dickhead
AFL beats NRL, easy
What are you talking about?eelofwest wrote:What separate competition?Xman wrote:Why would they include another seperate competition in the final tally?Raiderdave wrote:prove otherwise ***********
AFL beats NRL, easy
Its called representative fixtures, something the AFL could only dream of..............![]()
![]()
![]()
SOO State rep NRL.
Kangaroos, rep NRL.
City country Regional rep NRL
Indigenous all Stars vs NRL Allstars NRL
NRL 133m Viewers for 2012
AFL 121m
Even with simulcasting you Boys are number 2.....![]()
![]()
Easy win boys congrats to our RL family on a great year and happy new year to you all.......... =D> =D>
The article we usually see at the end of the year is from Roy masters, and he compares NRL v AFL but includes SOO. The article this year doesn't say what they include but says the AFL increased by 8% and won easily.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Pre season comp has been added each season to the tally, the NRL hasn't had a pre season cup shown on TV for a decade.
So all up, how many more games did the Vfl get on FTA TV compared to the NRL also shown nation wide?
Now that's embarrassing, the Vfl should be smashing the NRL sideways, yet it isn't.
4 FTA games a week live nationwide up against 1 live FTA game followed by 2 delayed games (one being late night).
Vfl, couldn't win when the hands of its competitor were tied behind the competitors back, now the hands are untied.
Proof? Ahhh what the hell, like all you nRL tards you have no proof.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Pre season comp has been added each season to the tally
So are you talking in Australia or worldwide with this claim? If so, remove the NZ figures from the nRL's ratings. Otherwise if you're talking worldwide then soccer wins. Easily.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Rugby League smashed all again this year and I reckon if you added the 3 other major football codes ratings together, Rugby League would still win.
Now that's a smashing isn't it Xman?
Got figures for all ARs comps including preseason cup, WAFL, SAFL, VFL, TFL etc?Xman wrote:What separate competition?eelofwest wrote:Why would they include another seperate competition in the final tally?Xman wrote:prove otherwise ***********
AFL beats NRL, easy
Its called representative fixtures, something the AFL could only dream of..............![]()
![]()
![]()
SOO State rep NRL.
Kangaroos, rep NRL.
City country Regional rep NRL
Indigenous all Stars vs NRL Allstars NRL
NRL 133m Viewers for 2012
AFL 121m
Even with simulcasting you Boys are number 2.....![]()
![]()
Easy win boys congrats to our RL family on a great year and happy new year to you all.......... =D> =D>
Xman wrote:The article we usually see at the end of the year is from Roy masters, and he compares NRL v AFL but includes SOO. The article this year doesn't say what they include but says the AFL increased by 8% and won easily.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Pre season comp has been added each season to the tally, the NRL hasn't had a pre season cup shown on TV for a decade.
So all up, how many more games did the Vfl get on FTA TV compared to the NRL also shown nation wide?
Now that's embarrassing, the Vfl should be smashing the NRL sideways, yet it isn't.
4 FTA games a week live nationwide up against 1 live FTA game followed by 2 delayed games (one being late night).
Vfl, couldn't win when the hands of its competitor were tied behind the competitors back, now the hands are untied.
RL 131 MillionStewie wrote:Proof? Ahhh what the hell, like all you nRL tards you have no proof.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Pre season comp has been added each season to the tally
AFL 123m def nRL 113m. End of
Source to back up your claim? Oh wait you're running of fake figuresRaiderdave wrote:RL 131 MillionStewie wrote:Proof? Ahhh what the hell, like all you nRL tards you have no proof.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Pre season comp has been added each season to the tally
AFL 123m def nRL 113m. End of
Vicky kicky 123 Million
kewl
As the independant article said, and using OZTAM figures, the AFL won easily over the NRL. EASILY. =D> =D>Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:The article we usually see at the end of the year is from Roy masters, and he compares NRL v AFL but includes SOO. The article this year doesn't say what they include but says the AFL increased by 8% and won easily.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Pre season comp has been added each season to the tally, the NRL hasn't had a pre season cup shown on TV for a decade.
So all up, how many more games did the Vfl get on FTA TV compared to the NRL also shown nation wide?
Now that's embarrassing, the Vfl should be smashing the NRL sideways, yet it isn't.
4 FTA games a week live nationwide up against 1 live FTA game followed by 2 delayed games (one being late night).
Vfl, couldn't win when the hands of its competitor were tied behind the competitors back, now the hands are untied.![]()
![]()
yuz got whopped .... again
with more games all up & a lot lot more on FTA ..... plus simulcasting on pay
&
WA & TAS regionals included
its still the Silver medal for vicky kicky
Roy didn't need to write a thing ... as the above says it all