Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2022 11:10 pm
Well that's true as well.
www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
He is posting an accurate figure. for FTA. He doesnt really post to cater for the sensibilities of NRL folks who hate any kind of context except when it suits.truthbomber wrote: Tue Aug 23, 2022 6:58 am![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Dr Mr TV..
please while you're losing your load in your Y fronts
post accurate headlines
**** aflol figure for sunday beat the entire NRL's ...... FTA ... national audience where only half of people watched it..
not the national audience
which was near 700K
Cheers![]()
Gone wrote: Tue Aug 23, 2022 9:42 amHe is posting an accurate figure. for FTA. He doesnt really post to cater for the sensibilities of NRL folks who hate any kind of context except when it suits.truthbomber wrote: Tue Aug 23, 2022 6:58 am![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Dr Mr TV..
please while you're losing your load in your Y fronts
post accurate headlines
**** aflol figure for sunday beat the entire NRL's ...... FTA ... national audience where only half of people watched it..
not the national audience
which was near 700K
Cheers![]()
Dont really know how many people watched it in Melbourne on Fox/Kayo either. Probably still beat the national figure.
Yawn. The guy shouldnt have to spell out every single nuance just for idiots like you. Anyone with half a brain knows what hes referring to. Its not deceptive to anyone who takes the time to see what hes actually saying.Terry wrote: Tue Aug 23, 2022 10:36 am
That's great bummy! But as you well know the bloke is purposely deceptive. Always. Nowhere in the quote does he say 'FTA only'.
Making shit out of nothing because you willfully choose the context you want.His last sentence is a stand alone and says, "Melbourne beat the entire national audience of NRL". This statement is a lie. The entire national audience was about 700k. Because, as you well know, the entire national audience includes FTA+Fox+Kayo.
Gone wrote: Tue Aug 23, 2022 12:09 pmYawn. The guy shouldnt have to spell out every single nuance just for idiots like you. Anyone with half a brain knows what hes referring to. Its not deceptive to anyone who takes the time to see what hes actually saying.Terry wrote: Tue Aug 23, 2022 10:36 am
That's great bummy! But as you well know the bloke is purposely deceptive. Always. Nowhere in the quote does he say 'FTA only'.
Making shit out of nothing because you willfully choose the context you want.His last sentence is a stand alone and says, "Melbourne beat the entire national audience of NRL". This statement is a lie. The entire national audience was about 700k. Because, as you well know, the entire national audience includes FTA+Fox+Kayo.
Gone wrote: Tue Aug 23, 2022 9:42 amHe is posting an accurate figure. for FTA. He doesnt really post to cater for the sensibilities of NRL folks who hate any kind of context except when it suits.truthbomber wrote: Tue Aug 23, 2022 6:58 am![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Dr Mr TV..
please while you're losing your load in your Y fronts
post accurate headlines
**** aflol figure for sunday beat the entire NRL's ...... FTA ... national audience where only half of people watched it..
not the national audience
which was near 700K
Cheers![]()
Dont really know how many people watched it in Melbourne on Fox/Kayo either. Probably still beat the national figure.
the only ones making shit up here is you & Mr TVGone wrote: Tue Aug 23, 2022 12:09 pmYawn. The guy shouldnt have to spell out every single nuance just for idiots like you. Anyone with half a brain knows what hes referring to. Its not deceptive to anyone who takes the time to see what hes actually saying.Terry wrote: Tue Aug 23, 2022 10:36 am
That's great bummy! But as you well know the bloke is purposely deceptive. Always. Nowhere in the quote does he say 'FTA only'.
Making shit out of nothing because you willfully choose the context you want.His last sentence is a stand alone and says, "Melbourne beat the entire national audience of NRL". This statement is a lie. The entire national audience was about 700k. Because, as you well know, the entire national audience includes FTA+Fox+Kayo.
I thought as soon as I saw that tweet from Mr TV that our NRL friends here would be triggered.Gone wrote: Tue Aug 23, 2022 9:42 amHe is posting an accurate figure. for FTA. He doesnt really post to cater for the sensibilities of NRL folks who hate any kind of context except when it suits.truthbomber wrote: Tue Aug 23, 2022 6:58 am![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Dr Mr TV..
please while you're losing your load in your Y fronts
post accurate headlines
**** aflol figure for sunday beat the entire NRL's ...... FTA ... national audience where only half of people watched it..
not the national audience
which was near 700K
Cheers![]()
Dont really know how many people watched it in Melbourne on Fox/Kayo either. Probably still beat the national figure.
Yeah I’ve seen them go all feral on you and Mr TV Australia in the past, just for publishing tweets with footy tv ratings. Don’t concern yourself with the haters though mate, you and Mr TV do an amazing job compiling tv ratings, crowds, news and other interesting data. Very much appreciated by the majority.Gone wrote: Tue Aug 23, 2022 10:03 pmOf course they'd be triggered. NRL fans are some of the most easily triggered people ive ever had to deal with on the internet.
But if you respond the same way...you get your mental capacities questioned.
the ratings are my opinion are they ?