NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

[Xman]

its been reported

VFL 123 Million
RL 131 Million

thats with the VFL having 11 more games then last year.. & 22 more then 2010
simulcast of every game except the GF on pay
TAS & WA regionals ratings now reported
every game on FTA to a targeted market

but alas
the VFL STILL had to settle with silver in 2012........... again

please find this report with these figures. I'd love to see it.......

you've seen them .. I mean..you posted the fucking thing yourself you gimp

Marcus
poncing around .... VFL 123 Million .. NRL 114 Million
we win we win
:

Wow, Raider fails at the most basic maths!

[Raiderdave]

please find this report with these figures. I'd love to see it.......

you've seen them .. I mean..you posted the fucking thing yourself you gimp

Marcus
poncing around .... VFL 123 Million .. NRL 114 Million
we win we win
:

Wow, Raider fails at the most basic maths!

well you were whacking yr little willy when you thought this was the final number didn't you ?

went off a bit early didn't ya
before your zip was down in a manner of speaking ...

[Xman]

Its the number reported in the paper by an independent source comparing the NRL to the AFL

[pussycat]

Its the number reported in the paper by an independent source comparing the NRL to the AFL

conveniently though , they left a large chunk of the report out Indepedent


Guess who run 2nd - again. =D> =D> Hint(they've got still got googie egg running down there chin from the last episode).

[ParraEelsNRL]

For us to be up anywhere near your sports deal after the last two deals says we have a victory anyway you look at it dopey, live with it. People like you said we RL fans are dreaming if you think it'll get anywhere near the Vfl. Well it has and it's closing on bettering it. If we want to gloat, we bloodywell will, you guys have given it to some of us online for a fucking decade, it's nice to have to shoe on the other foot for once.

And, we have just caught up after winning back our freedom, the next deal will blow your Vfl away.

We've covered this before.

1. We have always debated the Australian ratings, you claiming Australian regional ratings would make the difference, and us out longer game and Australian metro ratings. Who would have though you would then demand to include NZ in the comparison?

2. The NRL maximised their money in detriment to their TV coverage. Rumours had ch 9 offering all 8 games live, including better coverage into expansion states, for near 800m. Who would have known your ARLC would have duded every fan by taking cash over coverage.

3. How would we even know your deal is close? The Telstra deal is undisclosed as is our Toyota deal. NZ hasnt been decided either. We do know you are well behind for cash only.

but but but

this is what we were told .... no ifs or buts mentioned here

nah you'll only get 700 mill
cos we have the metros
cos we have sides in all mainland capitals
cos we have a longer game
cos we have reach .... our average ratings X 3 hrs ... V yrs ova 2 hrs
cos advertisers can sell more stuff ova 3 hrs then they can ova 2
cos the regionals don't matter cos the ratings are flawed

what the F happend marcus

Haha, that just about sums it all up.

[eelofwest]

you've seen them .. I mean..you posted the fucking thing yourself you gimp

Marcus
poncing around .... VFL 123 Million .. NRL 114 Million
we win we win
:

Wow, Raider fails at the most basic maths!

well you were whacking yr little willy when you thought this was the final number didn't you ?

went off a bit early didn't ya
before your zip was down in a manner of speaking ...

Xman if you are going to come in all guns blazing just make sure you have bullets next time yeah...........................................

[Xman]

Its the number reported in the paper by an independent source comparing the NRL to the AFL

conveniently though , they left a large chunk of the report out Indepedent


Guess who run 2nd - again. =D> =D> Hint(they've got still got googie egg running down there chin from the last episode).

Like what? They compared the leagues of the NrL v the AFL

Raider is trying to compare the ARL v the AFL rather than the ARL v Australian Rules.

Either is a reasonable comparison, but Raider wants to ignore them.

[Stewie]

Its the number reported in the paper by an independent source comparing the NRL to the AFL

conveniently though , they left a large chunk of the report out Indepedent


Guess who run 2nd - again. =D> =D> Hint(they've got still got googie egg running down there chin from the last episode).

Like what? They compared the leagues of the NrL v the AFL

Raider is trying to compare the ARL v the AFL rather than the ARL v Australian Rules.

Either is a reasonable comparison, but Raider wants to ignore them.

This. Raiderdave and others know that if it's a pure AFL v nRL comparison, that is AFL and nRL home and away + finals series games only, the AFL slaughters the much smaller nRL in EVERY possible aspect. =D>

[pussycat]

You must do a lot of drugs Stewie.

[Xman]

You must do a lot of drugs Stewie.

Maybe, but he's still correct. Now where is Roys TV ratings article this year? Seems the only article to come out shows the AFL win comfortably...

[ParraEelsNRL]

I seen one where RL smashed the Vfl again, it came out a few weeks ago.

Oh well.

[Xman]

I seen one where RL smashed the Vfl again, it came out a few weeks ago.

Oh well.

well we are either comparing NRL v AFL for RL v Aussie rules. We know who won the first one because it was already published this year

[ParraEelsNRL]

As I said, I seen one where RL was #1 again.

[Xman]

As I said, I seen one where RL was #1 again.

Well link it then

[ParraEelsNRL]

Why, it's already been posted here a few times.