Talking Footy

2012 Suns 11204 Titans 6674
2013 Suns 10454 Titans 8064

morley101 wrote:

2012 Suns 11204 Titans 6674
2013 Suns 10454 Titans 8064

That was my point.

Gold Coast people prefer AFL obviously.

Beaussie wrote:

morley101 wrote:

2012 Suns 11204 Titans 6674
2013 Suns 10454 Titans 8064

That was my point.

Gold Coast people prefer AFL obviously.

Not really..

2012 Average attendances

Suns 13645 Titans 14405

I think thats a bit to simpe:

at least do the attenedances over the last few years.
On top of that probabaly the titans get more viewers in goldcoast homes, so does that count as well?

morley101 wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

morley101 wrote:

2012 Suns 11204 Titans 6674
2013 Suns 10454 Titans 8064

That was my point.

Gold Coast people prefer AFL obviously.

Not really..

2012 Average attendances

Suns 13645 Titans 14405

yes it is considering the titans played there first season in 2007 and the suns in 2011.
the titans have been around 4 years longer. & Queensland is considered the other state where Rugby is dominate.

adamj1300 wrote:

morley101 wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

That was my point.

Gold Coast people prefer AFL obviously.

Not really..

2012 Average attendances

Suns 13645 Titans 14405

yes it is considering the titans played there first season in 2007 and the suns in 2011.
the titans have been around 4 years longer. & Queensland is considered the other state where Rugby is dominate.

It also show the Suns are going backwards since 2011.

adamj1300 wrote:

morley101 wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

That was my point.

Gold Coast people prefer AFL obviously.

Not really..

2012 Average attendances

Suns 13645 Titans 14405

yes it is considering the titans played there first season in 2007 and the suns in 2011.
the titans have been around 4 years longer. & Queensland is considered the other state where Rugby is dominate.

Rugby doesn't dominate any state you f wit
League does however ...2 of the 3 biggest states we have

& the only fair comparison is the Thuns First & second years up against the Titans to see who prefers what on the GC

Titans
2007 21K
2008 22K

Thuns
2011 19.5K
2012 13.5K

and the debate ends ................ here

morley101 wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

morley101 wrote:

Not really..

2012 Average attendances

Suns 13645 Titans 14405

yes it is considering the titans played there first season in 2007 and the suns in 2011.
the titans have been around 4 years longer. & Queensland is considered the other state where Rugby is dominate.

It also show the Suns are going backwards since 2011.

yes ...& how dramatic was it
a 33% drop in support after just one year

needless to say
another average year on field for the Thuns ( expected )

& it could be another 33% drop this year

Raiderdave wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

morley101 wrote:

Not really..

2012 Average attendances

Suns 13645 Titans 14405

yes it is considering the titans played there first season in 2007 and the suns in 2011.
the titans have been around 4 years longer. & Queensland is considered the other state where Rugby is dominate.

Rugby doesn't dominate any state you f wit
League does however ...2 of the 3 biggest states we have

& the only fair comparison is the Thuns First & second years up against the Titans to see who prefers what on the GC

Titans
2007 21K
2008 22K

Thuns
2011 19.5K
2012 13.5K

and the debate ends ................ here

Wow the titans have really dropped off and their drop off would be a lot more satistically significant as well with a lot more data. At least with the Suns you could claim that it was a bad year due to low expectations and hopefully theres some improvement. The titans have been on a downward trend for a while now.

Raiderdave wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

morley101 wrote:

Not really..

2012 Average attendances

Suns 13645 Titans 14405

yes it is considering the titans played there first season in 2007 and the suns in 2011.
the titans have been around 4 years longer. & Queensland is considered the other state where Rugby is dominate.

Rugby doesn't dominate any state you f wit
League does however ...2 of the 3 biggest states we have

& the only fair comparison is the Thuns First & second years up against the Titans to see who prefers what on the GC

Titans
2007 21K
2008 22K

Thuns
2011 19.5K
2012 13.5K

and the debate ends ................ here

True rugby doesn't dominate any state, but it does dominate the ACT. It is also more popular than league in plenty of states as well.

piesman2011 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

yes it is considering the titans played there first season in 2007 and the suns in 2011.
the titans have been around 4 years longer. & Queensland is considered the other state where Rugby is dominate.

Rugby doesn't dominate any state you f wit
League does however ...2 of the 3 biggest states we have

& the only fair comparison is the Thuns First & second years up against the Titans to see who prefers what on the GC

Titans
2007 21K
2008 22K

Thuns
2011 19.5K
2012 13.5K

and the debate ends ................ here

The titans have been on a downward trend for a while now.

yep
& even success didn't halt this (2010 .. one game away from the Grand Final )

& the Thuns will experience the same even with a bit of success which is probably not likely to occur anytime soon
the only difference will be

the Titans went backwards in yr 2 from 22K a game
the Thuns will also .. from 13K

if the Thuns do have a poor year on the field ( again expected) .... they will be lucky to keep their crowds above 10K
I think the Titans will be in contention for finals for most of 2013 ( game of the round against Manly tomorrow night at Skilled)
... & will keep their average around the 15K mark.

another clear .. hiding for the Victorian game
handed out by RL

True rugby doesn't dominate any state

is there a parrot in the room ?

but it does dominate the ACT

crowds wise , the bumbles are first , we're last .... if both sides were on the same footing we'd smash em
& the Raiders are watched by 5 territorians on pay TV to every 1 that watches the bumbles
I live here , you don't
the Raiders are the ACT's favourite football team , & probably the Dragons are 2nd
end of

It is also more popular than league in plenty of states as well.

plenty eh ?

NSW .. no
QLD ...no
VIC... no

SA .... who cares , theres no sides in either code there for any fair comparison
WA .. they have a yawnion side that averaged 11K last year .. the NRL's average in Perth in 2012 was 18,500

TAS ... see SA

yes
spewie with his finger on the pulse

Raiderdave wrote:

True rugby doesn't dominate any state

is there a parrot in the room ?

but it does dominate the ACT

crowds wise , the bumbles are first , we're last .... if both sides were on the same footing we'd smash em
& the Raiders are watched by 5 territorians on pay TV to every 1 that watches the bumbles
I live here , you don't
the Raiders are the ACT's favourite football team , & probably the Dragons are 2nd
end of

It is also more popular than league in plenty of states as well.

plenty eh ?

NSW .. no
QLD ...no
VIC... no

SA .... who cares , theres no sides in either code there for any fair comparison
WA .. they have a yawnion side that averaged 11K last year .. the NRL's average in Perth in 2012 was 18,500

TAS ... see SA

yes
spewie with his finger on the pulse

Crowds wise and participation wise union wins in the ACT, SA and WA. Ratings are next to impossible to find for the ACT alone, but union ratings for the Wallabies trounce what the Kangawhos get in Adelaide and Perth. Melbourne's union WC ratings also smash what the Kangawhos got.

The last time WA had a permanent nRL team in Perth its average crowd was way below what their union side is getting now.

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

True rugby doesn't dominate any state

is there a parrot in the room ?

but it does dominate the ACT

crowds wise , the bumbles are first , we're last .... if both sides were on the same footing we'd smash em
& the Raiders are watched by 5 territorians on pay TV to every 1 that watches the bumbles
I live here , you don't
the Raiders are the ACT's favourite football team , & probably the Dragons are 2nd
end of

It is also more popular than league in plenty of states as well.

plenty eh ?

NSW .. no
QLD ...no
VIC... no

SA .... who cares , theres no sides in either code there for any fair comparison
WA .. they have a yawnion side that averaged 11K last year .. the NRL's average in Perth in 2012 was 18,500

TAS ... see SA

yes
spewie with his finger on the pulse

Crowds wise and participation wise union wins in the ACT, SA and WA. Ratings are next to impossible to find for the ACT alone, but union ratings for the Wallabies trounce what the Kangawhos get in Adelaide and Perth. Melbourne's union WC ratings also smash what the Kangawhos got.

The last time WA had a permanent nRL team in Perth its average crowd was way below what their union side is getting now.

SA ... crowd wise ?
what crowds you moronic half wit

WA .... the NRL wipes the floor crowd wise as Ive proven

ACT .... the Bumbles only averaged 14K despite being on top of the S15 ladder in Oz all year in 2012
the Raiders would easily beat that if they were on top of the NRL ladder

250K on average for a Raiders game on pay TV nationally
about 80K for a bumbles game ... also nationally
its just common sense to work out that about 15% of both audiences are from the capital

do Wobblies ratings outrate origin in SA & WA ?
whats that
cat got yr tongue ?

spewie ......
summa yr best
summa yr best

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

is there a parrot in the room ?
crowds wise , the bumbles are first , we're last .... if both sides were on the same footing we'd smash em
& the Raiders are watched by 5 territorians on pay TV to every 1 that watches the bumbles
I live here , you don't
the Raiders are the ACT's favourite football team , & probably the Dragons are 2nd
end of
plenty eh ?

NSW .. no
QLD ...no
VIC... no

SA .... who cares , theres no sides in either code there for any fair comparison
WA .. they have a yawnion side that averaged 11K last year .. the NRL's average in Perth in 2012 was 18,500

TAS ... see SA

yes
spewie with his finger on the pulse

Crowds wise and participation wise union wins in the ACT, SA and WA. Ratings are next to impossible to find for the ACT alone, but union ratings for the Wallabies trounce what the Kangawhos get in Adelaide and Perth. Melbourne's union WC ratings also smash what the Kangawhos got.

The last time WA had a permanent nRL team in Perth its average crowd was way below what their union side is getting now.

SA ... crowd wise ?
what crowds you moronic half wit

WA .... the NRL wipes the floor crowd wise as Ive proven

ACT .... the Bumbles only averaged 14K despite being on top of the S15 ladder in Oz all year in 2012
the Raiders would easily beat that if they were on top of the NRL ladder

250K on average for a Raiders game on pay TV nationally
about 80K for a bumbles game ... also nationally
its just common sense to work out that about 15% of both audiences are from the capital

do Wobblies ratings outrate origin in SA & WA ?
whats that
cat got yr tongue ?

spewie ......
summa yr best
summa yr best

The international rugby 7's when they were here got much bigger crowds than any of those pathetic nRL games got. And the Wallabies were getting about 18k on a 3 hour delay here and about the same with Perth during the bled cup last year, bigger than Kangawhos ratings.

When WA had a permanent nRL team their crowds were below 10,000. WA now has a permanent union team and its ratings are above 10,000.

Union crowds smash nRL in ACT, glad we both agree on that.

You're using a national figure for your pay tv ratings for Raiders and Brumbies games. Find an ACT only figure and we'll talk.