2018 - NRL - Rugby League TV Ratings

[AFLcrap1]

Oh dear
What planet are you on
You have 9 x 2hr games per week
That equals 18 hrs .


RL has 8x 80 mins
That equals 10.66 hrs

Please try to keep up

You failed to answer so
Once again ..even applying whatever new bizarro theory you've come up with it still shows that RL is more valuable

Simple yes or no
I am using your methods .

[NlolRL]

Oh dear
What planet are you on
You have 9 x 2hr games per week
That equals 18 hrs .


RL has 8x 80 mins
That equals 10.66 hrs

Please try to keep up

You failed to answer so
Once again ..even applying whatever new bizarro theory you've come up with it still shows that RL is more valuable

Simple yes or no
I am using your methods .

Wrong, the ratings arent counted for game time only, theyre counted for the telecast. We have 27 hours content, our telecasts are around 3 hours per game. Yet we cram that in to around only 18 hours of time over the weekend. That's the same time the NRL is shown for. So it's hardly surprising the codes have similar amounts for their TV rights. In fact by all accounts RL should get more given they have internationals and SOO to sell into two of the three most lucrative advertising markets

[AFLcrap1]

Wtf are you on about
You have 18 hrs of game time .
We have 10.6
You can't dispute that
Yet somehow in bizarro land you say they're the same
As for broadcast time ..I call bullshit on your 18 hrs
Show me how there's only 18 hrs
&
You are as usual way off the mark about RL
We have 3 FTA broadcasts go for 2 hrs
Plus 5 x approx 100 mins
All up about 14.3 hrs of broadcast time


You still as per usual cant give a yes or no answer .
If you can't then your ratings theory of going for longer equals more viewers is shot .

Over to you .
An answer would be good .
Without the crap

[NlolRL]

Wtf are you on about
You have 18 hrs of game time .
We have 10.6
You can't dispute that
Yet somehow in bizarro land you say they're the same
As for broadcast time ..I call bullshit on your 18 hrs
Show me how there's only 18 hrs
&
You are as usual way off the mark about RL
We have 3 FTA broadcasts go for 2 hrs
Plus 5 x approx 100 mins
All up about 14.3 hrs of broadcast time


You still as per usual cant give a yes or no answer .
If you can't then your ratings theory of going for longer equals more viewers is shot .

Over to you .
An answer would be good .
Without the crap

again, the telecast is what the rights pay for, not just game time, and the AFL's telecast is 3 hours, while the NRL's is 2 hours. Your round is 16 hours (sorry, not 18) of telecast over 16 hours. Our is 27 hours but shown over 18 hours of time because most games are shown at the same time (eg: 7.30-10.30 FN, 1.30pm - 10.30pm Saturday, 1pm - 7pm SU).

Is that really so hard to understand?

[pussycat]

Oh dear
What planet are you on
You have 9 x 2hr games per week
That equals 18 hrs .


RL has 8x 80 mins
That equals 10.66 hrs

Please try to keep up

You failed to answer so
Once again ..even applying whatever new bizarro theory you've come up with it still shows that RL is more valuable

Simple yes or no
I am using your methods .

Wrong, the ratings arent counted for game time only, theyre counted for the telecast. We have 27 hours content, our telecasts are around 3 hours per game. Yet we cram that in to around only 18 hours of time over the weekend. That's the same time the NRL is shown for. So it's hardly surprising the codes have similar amounts for their TV rights. In fact by all accounts RL should get more given they have internationals and SOO to sell into two of the three most lucrative advertising markets

Yet another movie I've seen before.

So your showing 2 FTA matches of a Saturday and showing them into there local markets while 66% of NRL viewers cant watch a thing on a Saturday.
If you are lucky enough to have Pay tv you can watch any amount of Pay TV 1 to 10.30. You just have to watch it's all contributes to ratings.

Gee I don't know how you get on LOL your so hard done by

[NlolRL]

Yes we get an extra FTA game. Yes the NRL show all games in isolation. Yes we have 9 games a round. Yes the NRL have SOO. Yes we show games into home markets. Yes the NRL only have 3 home markets and they target their biggest every week. And on and on the differences go. Thats why each round and each season is not directly comparable

[AFLcrap1]

Wtf are you on about
You have 18 hrs of game time .
We have 10.6
You can't dispute that
Yet somehow in bizarro land you say they're the same
As for broadcast time ..I call bullshit on your 18 hrs
Show me how there's only 18 hrs
&
You are as usual way off the mark about RL
We have 3 FTA broadcasts go for 2 hrs
Plus 5 x approx 100 mins
All up about 14.3 hrs of broadcast time


You still as per usual cant give a yes or no answer .
If you can't then your ratings theory of going for longer equals more viewers is shot .

Over to you .
An answer would be good .
Without the crap

again, the telecast is what the rights pay for, not just game time, and the AFL's telecast is 3 hours, while the NRL's is 2 hours. Your round is 16 hours (sorry, not 18) of telecast over 16 hours. Our is 27 hours but shown over 18 hours of time because most games are shown at the same time (eg: 7.30-10.30 FN, 1.30pm - 10.30pm Saturday, 1pm - 7pm SU).

Is that really so hard to understand?

Utter fucking bullshit
You have approx 27 hrs of broadcast time .
Yet in bizarro world that equals 18

What is in the water down south .
Simply put
Are all games shown.....answer yes
So that's 3x 9 = 27

Not 18

So back to my original question which you are still avoiding
Which is the most valuable sport & worth the most .

You won't answer because it will destroy your ratings time argument .

[NlolRL]

use your brain FFS!

27 hours of AFL are shown within 3 hours on Friday night, 9 hours on Saturday, and 6 hours on Sunday. That's 27 hours of football within 18 hours time. It may benefit the networks to show games into home markets or Fox to have 2 AFL games on at the same time, but their own telecasts rob the other network or the other channel of viewers. Ch7 would pay less because they dont have an exclusive game on Saturday and Sunday, their potential audience has another option on foxtel.

These issues dont apply to the NRL CH9 and Foxtel have exclusive content with no NRL opposition shown at the same time. 16 hours of NRL over 16 hours time.

This explains why the AFL have what looks like more content, where as in actual fact the available content is around the same

[NlolRL]

use your brain FFS!

27 hours of AFL are shown within 3 hours on Friday night, 9 hours on Saturday, and 6 hours on Sunday. That's 27 hours of football within 18 hours time. It may benefit the networks to show games into home markets or Fox to have 2 AFL games on at the same time, but their own telecasts rob the other network or the other channel of viewers. Ch7 would pay less because they dont have an exclusive game on Saturday and Sunday, their potential audience has another option on foxtel.

These issues dont apply to the NRL CH9 and Foxtel have exclusive content with no NRL opposition shown at the same time. 16 hours of NRL over 16 hours time.

This explains why the AFL have what looks like more content, where as in actual fact the available content is around the same, because no one can watch two games or two channels at the same time. The networks arent stupid, they know the AFL's schedule and network arrangements disadvantages them

[AFLcrap1]

Oh dear
Use what little brains you have
Are all games shown
Yes ..
Doesn't matter that it's the same time ..it's still shown & into home markets .
You can't say 27 hrs of broadcast ..& it is 27 hrs is only 18 .


So you still can't answer the question I've asked continuously

How surprising ...

So it's either Aflol doesn't win the ratings because it goes longer ,
Or they do & Rl is more valuable
Which is it
You can't have it both ways

[NlolRL]

Oh dear
Use what little brains you have
Are all games shown
Yes ..
Doesn't matter that it's the same time ..it's still shown & into home markets .
You can't say 27 hrs of broadcast ..& it is 27 hrs is only 18 .


So you still can't answer the question I've asked continuously

How surprising ...

So it's either Aflol doesn't win the ratings because it goes longer ,
Or they do & Rl is more valuable
Which is it
You can't have it both ways

Of course it matters! You think fox are going to pay the same for the AFL when none of their matches are exclusive? You think ch7 are going to pay the same when most of their matches are shown against another match on another network?

They obviously dont pay the equivalent of 27hrs of content when they cant offer that amount of content to their viewers. Why would they? Ch7 lose viewers to fox for a concurrent game, so their ratings drop and their advertising revenue drops. So why would they pay the same as a match that was exclusive?

[pussycat]

The Broncos have just 5 Friday night matches and 8 Thursday night. So your claim that the Broncos play every week is crap just like your theory's.

[Beaussie]

[AFLcrap1]

Oh dear
Use what little brains you have
Are all games shown
Yes ..
Doesn't matter that it's the same time ..it's still shown & into home markets .
You can't say 27 hrs of broadcast ..& it is 27 hrs is only 18 .


So you still can't answer the question I've asked continuously

How surprising ...

So it's either Aflol doesn't win the ratings because it goes longer ,
Or they do & Rl is more valuable
Which is it
You can't have it both ways

Of course it matters! You think fox are going to pay the same for the AFL when none of their matches are exclusive? You think ch7 are going to pay the same when most of their matches are shown against another match on another network?

They obviously dont pay the equivalent of 27hrs of content when they cant offer that amount of content to their viewers. Why would they? Ch7 lose viewers to fox for a concurrent game, so their ratings drop and their advertising revenue drops. So why would they pay the same as a match that was exclusive?

Oh dear
This is what I was talking about
The but but butting .
What you state is blatantly untrue
All games 3x9 are televised
Which equals 27 hrs
Compared to the NRL about 16

If I back 2 horses in the one race You know racing at the same time
I have 2x $100 bets & both lose ...I lose $200
In your bizarro land I only lose $100

Not my problem that the AFL can't schedule games correctly
But fox do try to maximise viewers by broadcasting into home markets .
Lol
It's still all games televised ..27 hrs of telecast time .
Deal with it .

[pussycat]

Wtf are you on about
You have 18 hrs of game time .
We have 10.6
You can't dispute that
Yet somehow in bizarro land you say they're the same
As for broadcast time ..I call bullshit on your 18 hrs
Show me how there's only 18 hrs
&
You are as usual way off the mark about RL
We have 3 FTA broadcasts go for 2 hrs
Plus 5 x approx 100 mins
All up about 14.3 hrs of broadcast time


You still as per usual cant give a yes or no answer .
If you can't then your ratings theory of going for longer equals more viewers is shot .

Over to you .
An answer would be good .
Without the crap

again, the telecast is what the rights pay for, not just game time, and the AFL's telecast is 3 hours, while the NRL's is 2 hours. Your round is 16 hours (sorry, not 18) of telecast over 16 hours. Our is 27 hours but shown over 18 hours of time because most games are shown at the same time (eg: 7.30-10.30 FN, 1.30pm - 10.30pm Saturday, 1pm - 7pm SU).

Is that really so hard to understand?

A game of AFL goes for about 110m .less than 20% longer than a league game. So if your ' super Elite athletes' didn't require 40m of resty time on top of there 100 interchanges, and had the Normal 10m break then you would have nothing to whinge about,. There lyes the problem though , no more excuses, nothing to But, But , But about