Talking Footy

Looks like Fred & sports liar have vacated this thread
Lol,
One thinks 10% is close
The other thinks far less than 10% is not even close .


The brains trust in action

Maybe they went quiet because.... the vast majority of close up images you can find of melb AFL crowds.... look like this ...





It's hard when u talk outta ur arse and get shown up to talk abbbbsolute shite!

I gotta be honest I'd feel like going quiet too!

But... I wouldn't.. I'd man up and admit I was in the wrong. There be the difference mah members and guests... there be the difference

NlolRL wrote: Sun Nov 26, 2017 1:08 pm

NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote: Sun Nov 26, 2017 7:15 am

Nothing has changed, is still a gangly white boys sport. And always will be.

some gangly white AFL players below

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/04/ ... 34x811.jpg

http://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/b458 ... width=1024

lol a couple of token black players Look at any AFL game, it is always 99% white.

Without doubt AFL is the most white anglo football code in the world.

GRIDIRON, RUGBY LEAGUE, RUGBY UNION AND FOOTBALL have all had way more success than AFL at attracting players from multiple cultures.

AFL just a gangly white boys game, Ireland is the only nation the sport has some hope in getting a following.

10% indigenous players in the AFL, which doesnt take into account the fiji and sudanese players.....so your maths is a little sketchy.

You're clueless. The rugby codes have attracted players from multiple cultural groups because the games are played in multiple countries.

ARs is Australia's game so it's no surprise we have predominantly caucasian and indigenous Australians playing. However, participation amongst Asian and African cultures is growing when they are exposed to the game as fairly immigrants. How many Sudanese or Asian players are in the NRL?

King-Eliagh wrote: Mon Dec 11, 2017 9:30 pm

Maybe they went quiet because.... the vast majority of close up images you can find of melb AFL crowds.... look like this ...





It's hard when u talk outta ur arse and get shown up to talk abbbbsolute shite!

As i said, we could fling a thousand pics at each other to back a point.
That's all you have, pics, in other words, Fuckall!
With the data i provided it showed of the 7+million that attended AFL games in 2017 about 3million were women. Please point out the other competition that came close to that. Or tell me how many women attended your NRlilL? Pics don't cut the mustard here chump.

But here's one in retort.




And this beauty! Tough to date though.........




Only joking with this one. It is from 1974. But it does highlight that it's not a new thing to see so many hot chicks at AFL games.

I have a bevy of other pics, you up for a slogging match?

Lol trying to move the goal posts after you were shown up .
Typical
You said the crowd was 50/50
Your link showed that was wrong.
You now try to convert that 50-50 into how many actually went to games .
Lol
Pathetic .
You claimed no other sport comes close to AFL ( in regards to the split )
Your link showed that was also wrong.

Try again .
Shift the posts a bit more .

AFLcrap1 wrote: Wed Jan 03, 2018 5:02 pm

Lol trying to move the goal posts after you were shown up .
Typical
You said the crowd was 50/50
Your link showed that was wrong.
You now try to convert that 50-50 into how many actually went to games .
Lol
Pathetic .
You claimed no other sport comes close to AFL ( in regards to the split )
Your link showed that was also wrong.

Try again .
Shift the posts a bit more .

Your constant mis-quoting is a poor reflection on your intelligence quotient.
Clean it up will ya!
I said close to 50/50.
The data i produced claimed 41.38% are women. Close to 50/50 imo
41.38% of 7287880 is 3015724.
And no other league or competition in this country comes close to that. Probably not even half that number.

What part don't you understand? Seriously, it's pretty simple stuff.
Do you need a ratio?

I'm considering a new award for you if you continue to struggle with this.

Nope
Your original post had no reference to overall numbers .
All you said was 50/50 & no other sport comes close .
Your source showed that was wrong .
So now beep beep whack her in reverse .
You were wrong on both counts .

Just to refresh sports liars memory


I'm constantly amazed at the crowd demographic. It's got to be close to 50/50. No other league comes close. That's half the population.

Lol

& once again your self ownage is apparent.
Yet you can't see it .

Thanks for that.
"It's got to be close to 50/50"
From the data:
AFL 41.38%. Close.
NRL 37.5% Not close.
Applying this to attendances just further confirms how far behind you NRlilLeaguers are.
Just another number One for the AFL.
The list lengthens!
How's the lilLeague's list going?

Oh my .
You still can't see where you contradict yourself . Lol
Keep looking .
I'll educate if you need .

Was math an elective at your school?
Here's a lesson for you.
Let's look at the figures for the women at our games. That is what we're talking about.
AFL : 41.38%
NRlilL : 37.5%
Now, what percentage gain does NRlilL women need to catch AFL?
I can guarantee you'll say 3.88% and you believe this is where I contradict myself.
But you couldn't be more wrong. Those figures factor the men in.
The actual gain required to catch the AFL women is 10.35% as the men need to be removed from the new equation to show an accurate representative figure for the women only.
Which is exactly what I was referencing.
And as I also stated within 10% is close.
So you see crap there's no contradiction, just your inadequate ability to crunch numbers.
Numbers don't lie, but you do!
I'll forgo a formal written apology for public if you'd like...

Lol nope
In your world within 10% is close .
Except if the nrl is within 10% of the AFL .
Then it's not even close

Which is is .
& Jesus h Christ you are all over the place .
You post the percentage of women at games
When shown how you contradict yourself you then say MEN have to be removed from that .
WHatever drugs you're on ...it's good shit

Simple fact that you will now avoid is te claim that within 10% is close because it's AFL .
Yet when the NRL,is less than 5% it's not .
Oh my .
& you wonder why you get laughed at

Lol I'll,explain it in simple terms .you still will have massive troubles .
For every 100 people at a fumble game approx 41 are female
For every 100 people at an NRL game approx 37.5 are female .

Now according to you 41 is close to 50

Yet 37.5 doesn't come close to 41.

In vicderpian education ....3.5 or 4 is far bigger than 9

Put your helmet back on next time you ride a bike .
Although I suspect the damage has already been done .