Talking Footy

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

We've done 73k in Sydney before for an ordinary regular season game. Let me know when the storm does that.

How long ago was that .
Correct me if I'm wrong but 50 k is out of reach these days .

I would agree because Swans fans don't like ANZ - but 48 definitely within reach!

So if swans fans don't like ANZ
how do you expect NRL fans to like ANZ and go in big numbers

leeroy*NRL* wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

We've done 73k in Sydney before for an ordinary regular season game. Let me know when the storm does that.

How long ago was that .
Correct me if I'm wrong but 50 k is out of reach these days .

I would agree because Swans fans don't like ANZ - but 48 definitely within reach!

So if swans fans don't like ANZ
how do you expect NRL fans to like ANZ and go in big numbers

Isn't that a problem for the NRL - Swans fans home ground is the SCG!

Swans4ever wrote:

leeroy*NRL* wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

We've done 73k in Sydney before for an ordinary regular season game. Let me know when the storm does that.

How long ago was that .
Correct me if I'm wrong but 50 k is out of reach these days .

I would agree because Swans fans don't like ANZ - but 48 definitely within reach!

So if swans fans don't like ANZ
how do you expect NRL fans to like ANZ and go in big numbers

Isn't that a problem for the NRL - Swans fans home ground is the SCG!

and its a big reason why the Swans are leaving ANZ

because its a hopeless ground for viewing

if the FANS turned out at ANZ the SWANS would still be there..

the FANS disappeared so the SWANS are leaving ANZ

leeroy*NRL* wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

We've done 73k in Sydney before for an ordinary regular season game. Let me know when the storm does that.

How long ago was that .
Correct me if I'm wrong but 50 k is out of reach these days .

I would agree because Swans fans don't like ANZ - but 48 definitely within reach!

So if swans fans don't like ANZ
how do you expect NRL fans to like ANZ and go in big numbers

Aside from the gimmick of SOO & the GF, all those exgrated number of nrlol fans don't seem to turn up at any venue

What's an EXGRATED fan ?

leagueiscrap wrote:

leeroy*NRL* wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

We've done 73k in Sydney before for an ordinary regular season game. Let me know when the storm does that.

How long ago was that .
Correct me if I'm wrong but 50 k is out of reach these days .

I would agree because Swans fans don't like ANZ - but 48 definitely within reach!

So if swans fans don't like ANZ
how do you expect NRL fans to like ANZ and go in big numbers

Aside from the gimmick of SOO & the GF, all those exgrated number of nrlol fans don't seem to turn up at any venue

What are you even on about.

16k Average is not no one...
what is the AFL AVG 32K

So double ( the way you talk about it, Is like the NRL is seen by 10people at the game.)

what the NRL lose in crowds they make up for it in SOO INTERNATIONALS and TV RATINGS!
YES THE INVISABLE PEOPLE

Don't you Vickheads feel somewhat embarrassed and ashamed that the highest rating football match , on FTA, in Victoria this year was a rugby league match.

Don't you Vickheads feel somewhat embarrassed and ashamed that the largest crowd for a football match in Victoria this year has been for a rugby league match.

Don't you Vickheads feel somewhat embarrassed and ashamed that , after next wednesday , rugby league will have had the 4 highest rating football programs on tv.

And dont you feel sorry for people like Leagueiscrap, who think ratings and ratings boxes.......are????????????..........god only knows what he thinks.

pussycat wrote:

Don't you Vickheads feel somewhat embarrassed and ashamed that the highest rating football match , on FTA, in Victoria this year was a rugby league match.

Don't you Vickheads feel somewhat embarrassed and ashamed that the largest crowd for a football match in Victoria this year has been for a rugby league match.

Don't you Vickheads feel somewhat embarrassed and ashamed that , after next wednesday , rugby league will have had the 4 highest rating football programs on tv.

And dont you feel sorry for people like Leagueiscrap, who think ratings and ratings boxes.......are????????????..........god only knows what he thinks.

out side of this SOO state vs state gimmick where do all the fans go pissy cat

leeroy*NRL* wrote:

leagueiscrap wrote:

leeroy*NRL* wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

We've done 73k in Sydney before for an ordinary regular season game. Let me know when the storm does that.

How long ago was that .
Correct me if I'm wrong but 50 k is out of reach these days .

I would agree because Swans fans don't like ANZ - but 48 definitely within reach!

So if swans fans don't like ANZ
how do you expect NRL fans to like ANZ and go in big numbers

Aside from the gimmick of SOO & the GF, all those exgrated number of nrlol fans don't seem to turn up at any venue

What are you even on about.

16k Average is not no one...
what is the AFL AVG 32K

So double ( the way you talk about it, Is like the NRL is seen by 10people at the game.)

what the NRL lose in crowds they make up for it in SOO INTERNATIONALS and TV RATINGS!
YES THE INVISABLE PEOPLE

aside from the AFL just pipping the NRLOL in the ratings why is it the AFL is decades ahead in every area, crowds, participation, memberships, revenue, sponsorship, etc

ffs the NRLOL internationals are a joke Australia thumping a bunch of minnow nations topped up with NRLOL players

pussycat wrote:

Don't you Vickheads feel somewhat embarrassed and ashamed that the highest rating football match , on FTA, in Victoria this year was a rugby league match.

Don't you Vickheads feel somewhat embarrassed and ashamed that the largest crowd for a football match in Victoria this year has been for a rugby league match.

Don't you Vickheads feel somewhat embarrassed and ashamed that , after next wednesday , rugby league will have had the 4 highest rating football programs on tv.

And dont you feel sorry for people like Leagueiscrap, who think ratings and ratings boxes.......are????????????..........god only knows what he thinks.

This is dumbos theory .
Makes sense if you get plastered on metho & fall over & hit your head on the concrete night after night .



Tv stations hand out ratings boxers to select people .
Knowing that they will watch certain programs .
Then try to leverage advertising dollars off companies with these fake numbers .


So once a tv channel has put out fake ratings to show how popular a program or sport is ,they then have to fork out hundreds of millions of dollars to buy the rights to that sport .
Why would they artificially inflate the popularity of a sport when it will drive the price up ?
According to you they are paying big overs for something they know doesn't rate well ,but they lied about that so they could outlay far more than it's worth.

leagueiscrap wrote:

leeroy*NRL* wrote:

leagueiscrap wrote:

leeroy*NRL* wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

We've done 73k in Sydney before for an ordinary regular season game. Let me know when the storm does that.

How long ago was that .
Correct me if I'm wrong but 50 k is out of reach these days .

I would agree because Swans fans don't like ANZ - but 48 definitely within reach!

So if swans fans don't like ANZ
how do you expect NRL fans to like ANZ and go in big numbers

Aside from the gimmick of SOO & the GF, all those exgrated number of nrlol fans don't seem to turn up at any venue

What are you even on about.

16k Average is not no one...
what is the AFL AVG 32K

So double ( the way you talk about it, Is like the NRL is seen by 10people at the game.)

what the NRL lose in crowds they make up for it in SOO INTERNATIONALS and TV RATINGS!
YES THE INVISABLE PEOPLE

aside from the AFL just pipping the NRLOL in the ratings why is it the AFL is decades ahead in every area, crowds, participation, memberships, revenue, sponsorship, etc


ffs the NRLOL internationals are a joke Australia thumping a bunch of minnow nations topped up with NRLOL players

Wrong again .
NZ keep beating us .
How is that a thumping by Aust .
Lol you just can't post anything that is close to accurate .
& we beat you in participation .
Bad luck there old mate .
Have a warm metho to cheer yourself up .

Got nearly half a million, stop worrying about it and move on, boy oh boy State of origin pisses you off doesn't it

The_Wookie wrote:

No. because at the time of writing our total metro viewership is almost identical to the NRLs with exactly zero Origin or rep fixtures (27 million each). Our total fox viewership is at ahead of the NRLs by 4 million. When regionals and NZ are factored in, the ratings are almost even as far as I can tell. So no we arent embarrased.

So your saying that if you reduce Rugby league by about 20% the ratings are almost the same?

Haha all those AFL games shown on fta beamed into every state yet they're around even with the NRL who have less games per week, less games shown on FTA, less games shown live and supposedly less people interested in it because it has less states involved in it.

I think I finally worked out what they mean by less is more eh?

SOO really tipped them over the edge this yr .