Page 9 of 15

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 8:38 am
by King-Eliagh
You silly lil gosling. The abs clearly does not qualify the 'selected sporting events'. For all we know at this point it could be mamas taking their junior fries to under 6s on sat morn. I must admit, at those 'selected events' I'd say women are in attendance at around 30-45%.

Women's soccer in Australia is arguably bigger than women's rl, particularly at the higher level. At those selected events it's mass amounts of women, prob 80%.

I'll contact the abs Monday morn and have this sorted. Till then keep on shakin in dem boots porky.

Wookie me modbitch? You too need to take a good hard look at urself :lol:

Till then ladies, till then :)

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 9:06 am
by ParraEelsNRL
There are fark all females that go to the a league, there's fark all people who go period.

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 1:20 pm
by sydneyfc
i can hear ke breathing hard and smashing that keyboard already

close your eyes and take a deep breathe

as the stats surely proved.

there are more women at a-league games than nrl games - FACT. looks like that got settled very quick. its simple to see why women avoid going to nrl games. watching a bunch of boofheads run at eachother caveman style just doesn't do them any favors. obviously that can't represent all women...im sure at every nrl game you'll see a couple obese women that carry nicknames like"butch" and "bulldog" who absolutely love nrl. those are your true fans....:lol:

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 2:24 pm
by Raiderdave
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
There are fark all females that go to the a league, there's fark all people who go period.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/


the crowd at Newy last night

692

400 gutless hooligans
98 capos needed to tell the hooligans what to do & who to bash
39 people who wandered in a day early thinking it was the Knights game .... & promptly wandered back out again
1 women
2 children


33 seagulls
staff
police & Tinkler ... who took up 27 seats so was counted as 27 people 8-[

:lol: :wink: :wink: :_<> :_<> :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/

the LOL League
a fucking joke :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 2:25 pm
by Raiderdave
sydneyfc wrote:

there are more women at a-league games than nrl games - FACT. :
and

you're a filthy lying wanker .... FACT
& the debate closes :cool:

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 4:03 pm
by King-Eliagh
sydneyfc wrote:

there are more women at a-league games than nrl games - FACT.
:lol: this lil chumps digging his own grave.

sydfc me lil sooker lovin daffodil, the abs states that there is an approx. 37% women attending "selected soccer events". Now just let that sink in ur round ball brain for a few moments and consider whether or not "selected events" would mean solely a-league mens games... :lol:

Then have a look at these pics that come up as the first image in google images when you type in "Sydney roosteers crowd" and "Sydney fc crowd"

Image

Can you spot the woman? I can :lol: heaps of em scattered through enjoying their RL. Some of em look like they could be hotties too.

And now...

Image

Dear god, its like Hitler's third reich in there! I could spot a few manly looking women in there (perhaps they're actually men or ... is that you with the long hair on the left sydfc? )but at a far fewer ratio than the RL image.

Now please repeat this process one by one along the line of google images and tell me when you get to one where the ratio of women is higher than men in sooker for images of more than 100 people ... :lol:

"selected events" indeed :(/

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 9:00 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
:(/ :(/ :(/

He does have a good point.

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 10:53 pm
by post_hoc
KE going batshit crazy, trawling the web for cropped images.

The abs data don't lie. Lol

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:18 pm
by Raiderdave
post_hoc wrote:
KE going batshit crazy, trawling the web for cropped images.

The abs data don't lie. Lol
Ill trust my eyes wanker
Not some BS report

LOL league
Women & child free zone

A FACT :cool:

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:09 pm
by post_hoc
Lyingdave trying the 4 yr old routine of closing his eyes and pretending he isn't getting into trouble. Lol

Or maybe more akin to sticking his finger in the ears and shouting lalala

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:20 pm
by sydneyfc
been eating too many crayons today davey boy :lol:

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:21 pm
by Raiderdave
post_hoc wrote:
Lyingdave trying the 4 yr old routine of closing his eyes and pretending he isn't getting into trouble. Lol

Or maybe more akin to sticking his finger in the ears and shouting lalala
Not a child

Or a female to be seeni

A fact
The pictures .. unlike porky
Dont lie :cool:


Now
Get yr gutless arse into the ratings thread

Time to kick the shit outta some capos :wink:

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:23 pm
by Raiderdave
sydneyfc wrote:
been eating too many crayons today davey boy :lol:

Paging forrest


Paging forrest

You are required in the lol league ratings thread for the weekly capo laughathon

Paging forrest :cool:

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:27 pm
by AFLcrap1
Don't think they'll show .
The Doc has really got them upset .
Now RU is smashing them
The Much negatively talked about Titans got 4 x the ratings of the top of the table lol league clash ..
Nope ,can't see them discussing the shipwreck that is the lol league

Re: Sokka Hooligans at it again.

Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 12:56 pm
by King-Eliagh
post_hoc wrote:
KE going batshit crazy, trawling the web for cropped images.

The abs data don't lie. Lol
:lol: No the ABS data don't lie, but you do you filthy mangy hound :lol:

while conducting some alternative business related research, I just noticed the glossary of defitions within the explanatory notes section and checked it up on your crumby analysis provided above. Check this lil ditty mah biatches! Yes wookie, you're also one of mah biatches :lol: and note the bolded sections ;)
Sports attendances

The question on sports attendance asked the respondent which sports (matches or competitions) they had been to as a spectator, during the previous 12 months. The respondent's own definition of sport was accepted. A sport was included regardless of whether the event was paid for or free of charge, or if it was attended at an overseas venue; but it was excluded if it was school or junior sport. A limit of 5 sports could be listed. Due to under-reporting of some sports (not always regarded as sports), specific questions were asked about attendance at motor sports, harness racing, horse races and dog races.
http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf ... num=&view=

and here we had both wookie and porkchop suggesting the abs data was referring solely and only to spectators attending FFA games. For shame on you chumps!!! [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X

Myth busted - you chumps suck - KE rules this joint so don't go up against him


:afro: :cheers: :afro: