Talking Footy

Cracker wrote:

Where? Where is that in the figures provided by Leagueiscrap? The accumulated debt is only $12 million.

only ??



>


:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

pull your head out of your arse you complete dickhead

that's terminal that amount of debt for a club on the bottom of the ladder & no prospects to improve any time soon
that debt attracts an interest bill of nearly a million a year as its compounding every day

the Kitty Kats cannot control this debt or their spending
the VFL doesn't know what the fuck to do with them ... it is a disaster .. a complete catastrophe

time to fold them up & start again me thinks

The most important liability - the debt - is covered for with much left over as indicated. You are **** and you can't deny it. I shall ignore the second paragraph as it is off topic.

Raiderdave wrote:

Cracker wrote:

Where? Where is that in the figures provided by Leagueiscrap? The accumulated debt is only $12 million.

only ??



>


:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

pull your head out of your arse you complete dickhead

that's terminal that amount of debt for a club on the bottom of the ladder & no prospects to improve any time soon
that debt attracts an interest bill of nearly a million a year as its compounding every day

Again, completely ignoring the $43 million in revenue. I would hardly call revenue that covers for the debt and the interest comfortably terminal.

The_Wookie wrote:

Cracker wrote:

The most important liability - the debt - is covered for with much left over as indicated. You are **** and you can't deny it. I shall ignore the second paragraph as it is off topic..

Im not **** at all, Im reporting what the league, the club and the auditor are saying. You are sticking your fingers in your ears and pretty much ignoring anything that doesnt fit your world view - with no supporting evidence i might add or indeed anything that ccontradicts a word ive posted other than BUT BUT BUT the revenue... As for the second paragraph - You do that. While you can.

=D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>
But but but but its only RL fans that are complaining about My moderating..

Cracker wrote:

The most important liability - the debt - is covered for with much left over as indicated. You are **** and you can't deny it. I shall ignore the second paragraph as it is off topic.

Raiderdave wrote:

Cracker wrote:

Where? Where is that in the figures provided by Leagueiscrap? The accumulated debt is only $12 million.

only ??



>


:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

pull your head out of your arse you complete dickhead

that's terminal that amount of debt for a club on the bottom of the ladder & no prospects to improve any time soon
that debt attracts an interest bill of nearly a million a year as its compounding every day

Again, completely ignoring the $43 million in revenue. I would hardly call revenue that covers for the debt and the interest comfortably terminal.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>


beyond help this wanker is
beyond

Raiderdave wrote:

leagueiscrap wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Cracker wrote:

$43 million in revenue, that's what.

&

46 Million in costs

5 years of that equation has them


BWOKE

STONE
MOTHERLESS














BWOKE



nothing more to be seen here

their revenue still more than what the broncos revenue is & every other NRL club, the lions just spend more

ahhh
our filthy lying ***** strikes again folks
the truth.....

that 43 Million includes the lil bwoke kitty kats gaming revenues

the Brisbane Broncos earn 37 Million for their Football operations alone
& another 33 Million for their gaming & other revenues
that's 70 Million in total

&
they have never posted a loss in their 26 years of existence
&
have the largest cash reserves in the bank of any professional sporting franchise in the nation at 18 million dollars

the Raiders turn over slightly ..... more then this !!
the Bulldogs about the same as the Raiders
the Penrith Panthers .... about
142 Million all up


Adumb bum liar is to be ignored folks
as he has never told the truth on the pages ....

no evidence what so ever, the only profit a NRL club can make is off pokes, the NRL clubs are worthless pieces of shit
the penrith panthers, revenue is $20,718 million, 7 million of that comes from the NRL
http://footyindustry.com/files/2013Repo ... 202013.pdf

as for you oxygen thief's still made a loss on their 12 million dollar revenue

"The club's income also includes $1.4 million in annual ''appearance fees'' from the ACT government, which also provides payroll tax concessions worth $500,000 each year. The

Read more: http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-new ... z32Xxi7V2F

NRL clubs are worthless basket case pieces shit, their only way of making money is POKES

The_Wookie wrote:

Cracker wrote:

The most important liability - the debt - is covered for with much left over as indicated. You are **** and you can't deny it. I shall ignore the second paragraph as it is off topic..

Im not **** at all, Im reporting what the league, the club and the auditor are saying. You are sticking your fingers in your ears and pretty much ignoring anything that doesnt fit your world view - with no supporting evidence i might add or indeed anything that ccontradicts a word ive posted other than BUT BUT BUT the revenue...

You are **** because you are interpreting those reports to suit your own incorrect viewpoint. You call on me to provide supporting evidence when in fact you've already seen it and ignored it. I can't help it if you are so determined to see the Lions go belly up. Are you a Suns supporter by any chance? Or an old Bears supporter who didn't like it when the move was made from the Gold Coast to Brisbane? Or maybe an old Fitzroy supporter?

Face the facts. I have never denied the Lions were in any form of trouble. To say otherwise would be foolish. But to call them a "basketcase" would be overstating the problem.

Cracker wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

Cracker wrote:

The most important liability - the debt - is covered for with much left over as indicated. You are **** and you can't deny it. I shall ignore the second paragraph as it is off topic..

Im not **** at all, Im reporting what the league, the club and the auditor are saying. You are sticking your fingers in your ears and pretty much ignoring anything that doesnt fit your world view - with no supporting evidence i might add or indeed anything that ccontradicts a word ive posted other than BUT BUT BUT the revenue...

You are **** because you are interpreting those reports to suit your own incorrect viewpoint. You call on me to provide supporting evidence when in fact you've already seen it and ignored it. I can't help it if you are so determined to see the Lions go belly up. Are you a Suns supporter by any chance? Or an old Bears supporter who didn't like it when the move was made from the Gold Coast to Brisbane? Or maybe an old Fitzroy supporter?

Face the facts. I have never denied the Lions were in any form of trouble. To say otherwise would be foolish. But to call them a "basketcase" would be overstating the problem.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
Ok you got me .
You have to be a troll .
No one is this stupid.
If you are not a troll you are clearly brain damaged.
All the evidence backs up what Wookie says.
He is not interpreting things to suit himself.He is just reposting what .The League ,The club itself & the Auditor have said.You are taking what officials say & twist it to say its meaningless because its Wookie's version of what is going on.
How can you be so fucking blindly loyal to the AFL that you cannot see what a basketcase this club is.
Try living in the real world..

& if you are trolling ..well done.

I would expect a response like this from a rugby league fan who hates Aussie Rules with such passion. You are only agreeing with The Wookie just to side against me for sake of siding against me. It is The Wookie who is twisting the meaning of the reports, because none of them identify the Lions as a "basketcase". They identify issues that the club needs to rectify, and can rectify without to much difficulty.

I am yet to see any proof that the situation with the Lions is unsalvageable.

Cracker wrote:

I would expect a response like this from a rugby league fan who hates Aussie Rules with such passion. You are only agreeing with The Wookie just to side against me for sake of siding against me. It is The Wookie who is twisting the meaning of the reports, because none of them identify the Lions as a "basketcase". They identify issues that the club needs to rectify, and can rectify without to much difficulty.

I am yet to see any proof that the situation with the Lions is unsalvageable.

Fucking crackpot.


http://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/a ... 6850802495#
Why Brisbane Lions are the basketcases of the new season


Thankfully the AFL no longer seems to share a world view with Tony Abbott, and as such will seek to assist Brisbane's revival rather than eliminate its basket case. But for now, with their side nailed to the foot of the ladder, that is cold comfort for the old ''Roy Boys''.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/AFL/AFL-news/b ... z32aqLyWzN

Not so long ago Melbourne was the basket case of the competition, and maybe its plight, along with the Essendon ASADA dramas, have shielded the Lions from further public scrutiny, but they are a deserved laughing stock at the minute.

http://www.AFL.com.au/news/2013-10-17/w ... -the-lions



There’s been plenty of comments made about our group, saying we’re a basket case, but I don’t think we’re that far away. We’re going to get in their face and really pressure them up.

Read more: http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/AFL/bri ... z32ariRXXA


So you can find article after article on why they are a BASKETCASE ,yet in your warped reality ,everyone else is wrong & you are right.

Your braindead opinions have gone from laughable to hysterical.
All in the name of defending your beloved sport.

There are none so blind as those that cant see.

Find the term "basketcase" in the official documents that The Wookie has been preaching. Media opinion does not count. They are **** also just to chase a good story. You've never heard of sensationalisation?

Many clubs have asked for a bail out in certain conditions within certain frames. This is not unusual, nor is it proof that they were a basketcase when they asked. All clubs have an AFL guarantee (every club gets a share of the AFL's revenue from TV rights for example) and that is what the Lions report was referring to. Media opinion counts for nothing when it is being written for a headline. Again for clarity, if the Lions were a genuine basketcase where are the receivers? Yes it does have to be unsalvageable to be a basketcase, and you are interpreting the Oxford definition in your own way to suit the situation when it doesn't fit. The "evidence" does not support what you say (that the Lions are a basketcase) and that is a fact. The "evidence" says that they are in trouble and that is as far as it goes. Everything else beyond that is propoganda.

Raiderdave wrote:

Cracker wrote:

The most important liability - the debt - is covered for with much left over as indicated. You are **** and you can't deny it. I shall ignore the second paragraph as it is off topic.

Raiderdave wrote:

Cracker wrote:

Where? Where is that in the figures provided by Leagueiscrap? The accumulated debt is only $12 million.

only ??



>


:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

pull your head out of your arse you complete dickhead

that's terminal that amount of debt for a club on the bottom of the ladder & no prospects to improve any time soon
that debt attracts an interest bill of nearly a million a year as its compounding every day

Again, completely ignoring the $43 million in revenue. I would hardly call revenue that covers for the debt and the interest comfortably terminal.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>


beyond help this wanker is
beyond

as something as often said, about you delusional dave

And we are done here, and the above post will be used to show that The Wookie is not moderator material. Thank you.