www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
Far better than any NRL team, but thanks for askingParraEelsNRL wrote:Soooooo, how are the swines memberships going, reach their Sydney TV ratings yet, or did they pass them when they hit 20k?
The only people who "got it" are those who believe your fantasy world figures that you pull out of your arse, Dave. The sane of this forum know better than to believe you.Raiderdave wrote:again... & pay attention this time fuckwitPhelpsy wrote:What was,pay ratings for Sydney? I dont think they give them
pay figures are almost always a third of the FTA figure in any given market
40K on FTA for the Swines in Sydney
13K for pay in the same market
got it
good !!
Their foxtel ratings would be 30k or so. Their FTA ratings around 40-60k.AFLcrap1 wrote:& why would any Swans fan get Pay TV to watch them when they have been on FTA for 25+ yrs.
This bullshit about High pay tv figures for AFL in SYD is all crap.
Syd has a high % of AUS pay tv customers because of RL.
There was an article after the 1st yr of the AFL media dea which stated that the uptake for pay tv was poor ...only 20K new subscriptions for the yr.
& you can bet most of them wouldn't have been in SYD.
Phelpsey, watch your spelling or NCrapper will call you a 'GOOSE"Phelpsy wrote:Same reason I got fox... There isnt the samr coverage as in AFL heartland areas and all the,extra shows like 360.
Needed to be said.MarkZZZ wrote:Phelpsey, watch your spelling or NCrapper will call you a 'GOOSE"Phelpsy wrote:Same reason I got fox... There isnt the samr coverage as in AFL heartland areas and all the,extra shows like 360.
13 to 20K for pay .. end ofXman wrote:Their foxtel ratings would be 30k or so. Their FTA ratings around 40-60k.AFLcrap1 wrote:& why would any Swans fan get Pay TV to watch them when they have been on FTA for 25+ yrs.
This bullshit about High pay tv figures for AFL in SYD is all crap.
Syd has a high % of AUS pay tv customers because of RL.
There was an article after the 1st yr of the AFL media dea which stated that the uptake for pay tv was poor ...only 20K new subscriptions for the yr.
& you can bet most of them wouldn't have been in SYD.
Leaves the storm for dead.
60k.... :_<>Raiderdave wrote:13 to 20K for pay .. end ofXman wrote:Their foxtel ratings would be 30k or so. Their FTA ratings around 40-60k.AFLcrap1 wrote:& why would any Swans fan get Pay TV to watch them when they have been on FTA for 25+ yrs.
This bullshit about High pay tv figures for AFL in SYD is all crap.
Syd has a high % of AUS pay tv customers because of RL.
There was an article after the 1st yr of the AFL media dea which stated that the uptake for pay tv was poor ...only 20K new subscriptions for the yr.
& you can bet most of them wouldn't have been in SYD.
Leaves the storm for dead.
the Storm are hitting around 60K when they're on FTA in Melbourne after just 2 years of regular broadcasts dipshit
& those numbers are growing
the Swines aren't doing any better then that ... after 30 years
says it all really
Liar! Show us the proof!Raiderdave wrote:13 to 20K for pay .. end of
NRLCrap1 wrote:Liar! Show us the proof!Raiderdave wrote:13 to 20K for pay .. end of
Oh wait, you don't even know what proof is. You just make it all up as you go.
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> ![:[]](./images/smilies/th_iwstupid.gif "With Stupid"){kind=small}
I could take 10X the recommended dose of any drug & my morning shits would still be smarter than you.NRLCrap1 wrote:Go back to Ballie Henderson and take your meds, meat puppet.