Talking Footy

Get lost, Mark! It's clear as glass! THERE WAS AN AGREEMENT!! AFL v NRL was AUTOMATIC as Xman observed. THAT is fact! And don't deny it unless you want to be labeled as ignorant.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Get lost, Mark! It's clear as glass! THERE WAS AN AGREEMENT!! AFL v NRL was AUTOMATIC as Xman observed. THAT is fact! And don't deny it unless you want to be labeled as ignorant.

Touchy touchy now eh?

I'm afraid there's no such thing as 'automatic' in the betting world my lil douchebag. Oh. Perhaps a mystery bet comes close. But we cant do that on TF.

Seems me and marky boy are the only ones sticking to the actual facts here. Xman and cwapper are basing their entire argument on an assumption. It's quite amusing to watch, please keep trying you two.

:>::

Xman should realise he is backing a loser when he has Cwapper telling him what is right.

I think he does aflcrap. Actually im pretty much sure he does. But you see, when called upon as a mod, xman is often afwaid to make objective decisions because he knows someone will be irate with him. He has the qualities of a confused buffoon rather than a leader. This is precisely why I didn't call upon him to make an assessment of this case. But now he's in here the show has become a bit funnier. Its like a confused buffoon and a cwanky uneducated messed up emo teenage girl, both on acid, trying to decipher the English alphabet. It's all quite straight forward but they keep seeing things that aren't there and making up weird fantasies about what they see.

Hey bitches, there's no bet there

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Get lost, Mark! It's clear as glass! THERE WAS AN AGREEMENT!! AFL v NRL was AUTOMATIC as Xman observed. THAT is fact! And don't deny it unless you want to be labeled as ignorant.

No. You get lost

King-Eliagh wrote:

Xman wrote:

MarkZZZ wrote:

I didn't see any acceptance of the bet. All I saw was the acceptance of the duration of ban/exile. No commitment to any bet on a particular code.

Did K _ E say AFL? No.

Did He say NRL? No.

That's it, that's the end.


What others may or may not have read into it is just toilet paper. It's not worth the crap that's smeared all over it.

He was challenging Drac, an AFL supporter!!

Do you guys think Drac was betting on the NRL? >



Very very lame KE!

I wasn't really challenging dwac at all. Nor was I betting with him. I was fukking with his head

You Xman, you is nuttin but toilet paper!! And you best be watching yo self cause Im about to take a massive grog bog.

What a gutless piece of work you are!

I have to ask, why is this taking so long Xman. Clear cut. K-E didn't say he was betting either way, I think some people here assume. You know what they say happens when you assume?

MarkZZZ wrote:

I have to ask, why is this taking so long Xman. Clear cut. K-E didn't say he was betting either way, I think some people here assume. You know what they say happens when you assume?

Oh come on Mark! He challenged an AFL supporters claim about an AFL game drawing more fans than 4 NRL games! As if the sides were ever in question.

I'm not forcing a ban on KE. If he welcher the lack of respect will be there for all to see.

No bet, no loss, no welch. It's not your job or anyone elses to make rulings on what you think K-E meant but make a ruling based on what was actually said. Not that hard. Ncrapper put up the convo. Clearly no bet.

MarkZZZ wrote:

No bet, no loss, no welch. It's not your job or anyone elses to make rulings on what you think K-E meant but make a ruling based on what was actually said. Not that hard. Ncrapper put up the convo. Clearly no bet.

Didnt you just say the only dispute was which side KE was betting?

Xman wrote:

I'm not forcing a ban on KE. If he welcher the lack of respect will be there for all to see.

Well okay, and that's true because every time I post the facts are there for everyone to see anyway.

And you just owned Mark. Good! That loser who can't see beyong the end of his nose deserves it. Bet was made, Eliagh lost and he welched. If Mark doesn't want to see that he's got bigger problems than he thinks I have.

Can I just say one thing.

I was leaning towards the AFL on this one

King-Eliagh wrote:

Can I just say one thing.

I was leaning towards the AFL on this one

So you were challenging Drac by agreeing with him? .......

Xman wrote:

MarkZZZ wrote:

No bet, no loss, no welch. It's not your job or anyone elses to make rulings on what you think K-E meant but make a ruling based on what was actually said. Not that hard. Ncrapper put up the convo. Clearly no bet.

Didnt you just say the only dispute was which side KE was betting?

Now where did I say that?

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Can I just say one thing.

I was leaning towards the AFL on this one

So you were challenging Drac by agreeing with him? .......

For the love of god Xman, please, please learn how to read.
I told you before that I wasn't challenging dwac and you quoted and responded to me.

I wasn't CHALLENGING dwac at all really. I was fukking with his head. And I suppose you are getting closer. I was fukking with his head by agreeing with him.

I've said it countless times and it just fukks with yo mind cogs every time. I enjoy the sport of marngrook. I play the game for fukks sake! Now if you'd just open ur mind a teensy weensy bit and believe my truth, you'll understand that it aint "automatic" that I was going for the NRL on this one.



Aaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh yeeeeeeeaaaaaaahhhhhh

:>::