Page 9 of 16
Re: Is the Barassi line a load of bs?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:32 am
by Fred
He's beyond that swans. He's like the last Japanese solider on an island refusing to surrender .... When the war ended 30 years ago
Re: Is the Barassi line a load of bs?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:08 am
by Raiderdave
NRLCrap1 wrote:Oh here we go! Here are the REAL figures!!
Canberra Junior Rugby League total teams in the ACT from Under 10 to Under 16;
77
AFL Canberra Junior total teams in the ACT from Under 10 to Under 17 (no Under 16 so it counts);
76
Taking into account that AFL fields more players to a team.......GUESS THE REST!!!!!
:_<> :_<> :_<>
real figures
with no link & his hand firmly on his tiny willy
RL .. double the players the VFL has in Canberra
Re: Is the Barassi line a load of bs?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:10 am
by Raiderdave
Swans4ever wrote:Raiderdave wrote:cos789 wrote:cos789 wrote:
You don't have 3 divisions for every age group.
You have 3 zones.
Some clubs have 1/2/3 teams per age group just like JAFCs.
You don't have many clubs in Canberra.
You're driving 60k ~ 90k to Yass and Goulburn.
There are more AFL clubs IN Canberra as well as clubs surrounding Canberra like the Gouldburn Swans and Yass Roos.
Just for clarity,(for the dummies) the existance of three zones does not imply three divisions.
The existance of a comp in Zone 3 does mean there is a comp in Zone 1 or 2.
Some clubs do have multiple teams and that's as far as it goes.
Divisions as the word says is a divide on geographical, standard or age etc.
JAFCs have exactly the same setup with different number of teams in different age groups.
:_<> :_<> :_<>
just to clarify
you're a cockhead
& again for the dummies who all appear to be fumblers
there is no difference between a zone or... a division
its a term used to describe the level of skill within it
the Canberra Region Junior Rugby League fields 3 zones / divisons / comps .. within each age group from years 6 to 16 throughout its region
a total of 330 minor league teams & a whopping 5500 kids
more then double the number of weedy little shits who fumble bumble n miss in the same region who only field 1 zone/divison in each age group & don't even have an U16's .....
add our newly acquired low contact variant ( touch football ) to these numbers & there are over 20,000
that's
20,000 kids playing RL & its variants &
2,700 playing bumbleball
wow
just wow =D> =D> =D> =D>
It is amazing you can convince yourself of facts - you really need help please see a psychiatrist right away
its amazing you actually posted that without a spelling or grammatical error
:_<> :_<> :_<>
Re: Is the Barassi line a load of bs?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 11:05 am
by NRLCrap1
Raiderdave wrote:NRLCrap1 wrote:Oh here we go! Here are the REAL figures!!
Canberra Junior Rugby League total teams in the ACT from Under 10 to Under 16;
77
AFL Canberra Junior total teams in the ACT from Under 10 to Under 17 (no Under 16 so it counts);
76
Taking into account that AFL fields more players to a team.......GUESS THE REST!!!!!
:_<> :_<> :_<>
real figures
with no link & his hand firmly on his tiny willy
RL .. double the players the VFL has in Canberra
Wrong! And I proved it with statistical work that won't even bother with!
I went through the ladders of both codes counting the number of teams and then deducting those that weren't in the ACT. The totals are what I came up with.
Do I have to go through it bit by bit for you to admit that you're wrong, Dave?
Simple Fact: 77 teams in Canberra junior rugby league and 76 in junior AFL. Assuming 15 for rugby league and 18 for AFL equals 1,155 for rugby league and 1,368 for AFL.
Re: Is the Barassi line a load of bs?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 11:17 am
by Raiderdave
NRLCrap1 wrote:Raiderdave wrote:NRLCrap1 wrote:Oh here we go! Here are the REAL figures!!
Canberra Junior Rugby League total teams in the ACT from Under 10 to Under 16;
77
AFL Canberra Junior total teams in the ACT from Under 10 to Under 17 (no Under 16 so it counts);
76
Taking into account that AFL fields more players to a team.......GUESS THE REST!!!!!
:_<> :_<> :_<>
real figures
with no link & his hand firmly on his tiny willy
RL .. double the players the VFL has in Canberra
Wrong! And I proved it
.
.
ahhhhh
you proved you're a cockhead ... & that's about it pal !!
you left out half of all of the RL teams
because it doesn't suit your failing argument ..... we have double the number of registered club teams in the ACT from 6-16 then the fumbles & bumbles has
that's
double
& almost double the players factoring in the difference in players per team
in the rest of the region
its 4 to 1
I mean yr crap sport doesn't even have accredited officials to umpire games in this area til U14's ....
RL has accredited referees to referee every game from U6's to first grade in this district =D> =D> =D>
your sport is a minor ... shallow end player here in YOUR nations capital
RL in the Canberra Region poohs from a great height on this fumbling Victorian abortion
& you know it...
:_<> :_<>
Re: Is the Barassi line a load of bs?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 11:21 am
by NRLCrap1
:**** :**** :**** :**** :****
Obviously I'll have to do all the links and explain it in full to brainless Dave. This will take awhile.
Re: Is the Barassi line a load of bs?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 11:28 am
by Raiderdave
NRLCrap1 wrote::**** :**** :**** :**** :****
Obviously I'll have to do all the links and explain it in full to brainless Dave. This will take awhile.
please include every registered club we have this time .. not half of them
that's
every one
from 6 to 16 ............
K shit head ?
Re: Is the Barassi line a load of bs?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 11:33 am
by NRLCrap1
10 to 16. Below that is by your own admission subject to fudging.
Re: Is the Barassi line a load of bs?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 11:34 am
by Fred
In Canberra or including nsw clubs too ?
Re: Is the Barassi line a load of bs?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 11:36 am
by NRLCrap1
No, Canberra only because that's what this argument is about. NSW clubs don't count.
Re: Is the Barassi line a load of bs?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 11:38 am
by Fred
Okay
Re: Is the Barassi line a load of bs?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 11:42 am
by Fred
https://secureau.imodules.com/s/965/ima ... ring09.pdf
A bit old but highlights the topic of the thread somewhat.
Re: Is the Barassi line a load of bs?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 11:44 am
by Raiderdave
NRLCrap1 wrote:10 to 16. Below that is by your own admission subject to fudging.
not in our sport fuckhead ..... all of our 6 .. 7 ,8 & 9 yr olds are .... REGISTERED
& the VFL has organised club ausfudge comps in ages 8 & 9 so these kids would also be registered
its lookin pretty bleak for the Victorian game in Canberra when all club players are included eh cock.brea.th ?
just like I said it was
Re: Is the Barassi line a load of bs?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 11:48 am
by Raiderdave
f me
if it did the embarrassment would be culpable ....
RL
KIng in the Monaro Region
Re: Is the Barassi line a load of bs?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 11:55 am
by NRLCrap1
They don't play for premiership points, Brain Drained Dave, so they DON'T COUNT!!
I am only counting Under 10 in AFL (when they don't either) because rugby league Under 10 does. This is where both sides a re reliable and tell the biggest story.
This is about the ACT - NOT the Monaro region.