Talking Footy

No precedence? Hmmm somehow I highly doubt that Xman. I highly doubt it... It would have occurred hundreds of times at club level. And if we did some searching I'd put money its occurred at the AFL level also, on several occasions and not only by those who are retiring

King-Eliagh wrote:

Stewie wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

specialists for his anger management issues

That's your defence? Priceless Stewie! PRICELESS!

Now shall I list the other thugs of the AFL now or you wanna tap out while you can?

Well if he was seeing specialists then obviously he did have an anger issue and not taking people out of the game as a tactic.

How fucking thick are you?

Now shall I list the other AFL thugs or you wanna tap out whilst you can?

Cause you know what you said right? No thugs in the AFL

No on field thugs in the AFL these days, agreed.

Now you say "these days" I like your change but thats a biiiiig call stewie. Shall i list them now or you wanna tap out?

King-Eliagh wrote:

Now you say "these days" I like your change but thats a biiiiig call stewie. Shall i list them now or you wanna tap out?

When one says "in the AFL" they aren't usually referring to people that used to be in the AFL

Notice the "on field" as well?

King-Eliagh wrote:

No precedence? Hmmm somehow I highly doubt that Xman. I highly doubt it... It would have occurred hundreds of times at club level. And if we did some searching I'd put money its occurred at the AFL level also, on several occasions and not only by those who are retiring

So youve got no evidence....thought not.

Case closed your honour

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

No precedence? Hmmm somehow I highly doubt that Xman. I highly doubt it... It would have occurred hundreds of times at club level. And if we did some searching I'd put money its occurred at the AFL level also, on several occasions and not only by those who are retiring

So youve got no evidence....thought not.

Case closed your honour

I havent bothered to look....yet :D

Stewie wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Now you say "these days" I like your change but thats a biiiiig call stewie. Shall i list them now or you wanna tap out?

When one says "in the AFL" they aren't usually referring to people that used to be in the AFL

Notice the "on field" as well?

Yeah man, I'll go with in the AFL and on field last season. Shall I list them now or you wanna tap out? Last chance :D

King-Eliagh wrote:

Stewie wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Now you say "these days" I like your change but thats a biiiiig call stewie. Shall i list them now or you wanna tap out?

When one says "in the AFL" they aren't usually referring to people that used to be in the AFL

Notice the "on field" as well?

Yeah man, I'll go with in the AFL and on field last season. Shall I list them now or you wanna tap out? Last chance :D

Sure, go ahead. Going to be interesting what your definition of thug is compared to what we see in the nRL every week