Talking Footy

How about we start off with a report of an incident at Bruce stadium in 1997 at a Raiders NRL game. Then we can start to compare. I haven't found any report of any incident the likes that TLPG states happened at a match that he attended in 1997 at Bruce stadium at a Raiders game let alone one that would go down in infamy as a blight upon the ARL as did the "Battle of Windy Hill"

Xman there is no weaseling out of this one by TLPG he stated that "it was worse" not in his opinion it was worse. That requires him to back it up. No back up = BS = Lying mug = a point needs to be awarded.

You can put it up on the BS file or I will do it later on.

MarkZZZ wrote:

How about we start off with a report of an incident at Bruce stadium in 1997 at a Raiders NRL game. Then we can start to compare. I haven't found any report of any incident the likes that TLPG states happened at a match that he attended in 1997 at Bruce stadium at a Raiders game let alone one that would go down in infamy as a blight upon the ARL as did the "Battle of Windy Hill"

Xman there is no weaseling out of this one by TLPG he stated that "it was worse" not in his opinion it was worse. That requires him to back it up. No back up = BS = Lying mug = a point needs to be awarded.

You can put it up on the BS file or I will do it later on.

I will put it up later.

If you read my reply I said TLPG needs to find evidence of the incident. However, the term worse is subjective so I cant see how we are going to judge which fight was worse.

There he goes again! Patting TLPG on the butt and winking at him

King-Eliagh wrote:

There he goes again! Patting TLPG on the butt and winking at him

rather than acting like a tool, you tell me how worse is a quantitative or objective term and how we are supposed to measure it?

Ive stated that he must find evidence of the incident. What more do you want?

I've already told you two very objective and reasonable measures that any half intelligent baboon would agree would validly compare which fight was worse.

1. Numbers involved in the fight
2. Injuries obtained as a result of the fight

Go on Xman dont adjudicate this one, instead tap him on the butt again.

King-Eliagh wrote:

I've already told you two very objective and reasonable measures that any half intelligent baboon would agree would validly compare which fight was worse.

1. Numbers involved in the fight
2. Injuries obtained as a result of the fight

Go on Xman dont adjudicate this one, instead tap him on the butt again.

and since when does the media give accurate descriptions of injuries or numbers of people involved in a fight?

Xman, I don't have to find evidence of the incident - because it doesn't exist. I expected something in the news but there was nothing. That's how I know the ARL/Super League (whichever it was) hushed it up. During the SL war the last thing either league wanted was negative publicity. Also don't forget - this was in the crowd and not on the ground (the one difference between this and Windy Hill). I know of many examples where crowd fights were never reported in the media, even in the AFL. Chances are the same is the case in the NRL/ARL/Super League.

Hilarious stuff here!

TLPG wrote:

Xman, I don't have to find evidence of the incident - because it doesn't exist. I expected something in the news but there was nothing. That's how I know the ARL/Super League (whichever it was) hushed it up. During the SL war the last thing either league wanted was negative publicity. Also don't forget - this was in the crowd and not on the ground (the one difference between this and Windy Hill). I know of many examples where crowd fights were never reported in the media, even in the AFL. Chances are the same is the case in the NRL/ARL/Super League.

To be fair if you made the statement without clearly stating it was opinion then you need to back it up with evidence. KE got pinged for claiming there was a study about how AAFL fans are less intelligent or something to that affect. When he was challenged and failed to provide the evidence he got a BS point.

Oh wait. A turn of events. Xman actually looking like injecting some objectivity for a change...noooooooo this cant be true...?

TLPG what the hells going on? Lovers tiff?

King-Eliagh wrote:

Oh wait. A turn of events. Xman actually looking like injecting some objectivity for a change...noooooooo this cant be true...?

TLPG what the hells going on? Lovers tiff?

Stop speaking out your arse. I said from the start he needed to find evidence it happened. But the term "worse" was never going to be provable.

Oh thank god for that. Seems as though the lovers tiff is over folks. Xman's not going to adjudicate on this one after all.

My my Xman you are a bit choppy and changey today arent you. One minute you refer to a similar example where i received a BS point and look for all money like you'd happily adjudicate objectively and do the same for TLPG. The next minute your going back to your original line "its never going top be provable."



Anyway as long as you and TLPG are stil tight, nothing else matters eh?

King-Eliagh wrote:

Oh thank god for that. Seems as though the lovers tiff is over folks. Xman's not going to adjudicate on this one after all.

My my Xman you are a bit choppy and changey today arent you. One minute you refer to a similar example where i received a BS point and look for all money like you'd happily adjudicate objectively and do the same for TLPG. The next minute your going back to your original line "its never going top be provable."



Anyway as long as you and TLPG are stil tight, nothing else matters eh?

Seriously, where is your brain???

He needs to do two things:
1. show evidence it happened
2. prove it was worse than the Windy Hill fight

I personally dont believe you can prove one fight is worse than another unless accurate accounts of casualties is recorded. Therefore that part alone wouldnt result in a decision. However, he still needs to show evidence the fight actually occured. If he doesnt he gets a bs point.

You sniffing glue today or something? >

No, Xman, I don't have to prove the fight took place. Many fights occur without it being recorded. Besides, that's not part of the BS file that you started.

I will not tolerate being told I'm a liar. I know what I saw, and it will stay with me for the rest of my life. It was disgusting. The reference to Windy Hill was and is a personal opinion and nothing more than that.

TLPG wrote:

No, Xman, I don't have to prove the fight took place. Many fights occur without it being recorded. Besides, that's not part of the BS file that you started.

I will not tolerate being told I'm a liar. I know what I saw, and it will stay with me for the rest of my life. It was disgusting. The reference to Windy Hill was and is a personal opinion and nothing more than that.

Im not calling you a liar. The purpose of the BS file was to make people accountable for their claims. You made a claim about a fight and youve been challenged so you need to find evidence. Similar to when you challenged KE's claim about reading a study comparing AFL fan intelligence. the article may or may not have existed but his failure to find it cost him.