Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

That's cummulative, not weekly dopey. It's amazing how a longer season and including rep games gives ARL a higher cummulative figure (which is bs anyway) and then NRL fans say they have higher weekly ratings.

ahhh...
and how do you get a cumulative figure

by

adding up the weeky figures

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

35k! massive!

That's below the average AFL attendance in Melbourne. yes, the average!

don't care if its half the average of VFL games in derpsville

will it beat the midgits n gooses game
thats all that matters

And what will be your excuse if it does beat the highest home and away NrL game this year?

I somehow don't think it will need to be discussed

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

That's cummulative, not weekly dopey. It's amazing how a longer season and including rep games gives ARL a higher cummulative figure (which is bs anyway) and then NRL fans say they have higher weekly ratings.

ahhh...
and how do you get a cumulative figure

by

adding up the weeky figures

Cummulative is a total. It doesn't take into account if there are more samples taken. A weekly figure is only comparable if the number of samples is the same. In this case it clearly is not.

Not to mention the fact that the same number of viewing hours per week (14) counts as 7 views for the NRL and only 4.5 views for the AFL.

Not to mention the Bs that is the regional ratings.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

That's cummulative, not weekly dopey. It's amazing how a longer season and including rep games gives ARL a higher cummulative figure (which is bs anyway) and then NRL fans say they have higher weekly ratings.

ahhh...
and how do you get a cumulative figure

by

adding up the weeky figures

Cummulative is a total. It doesn't take into account if there are more samples taken. A weekly figure is only comparable if the number of samples is the same. In this case it clearly is not.

Not to mention the fact that the same number of viewing hours per week (14) counts as 7 views for the NRL and only 4.5 views for the AFL.

Not to mention the Bs that is the regional ratings.

BUT BUT BUT ............

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

ahhh...
and how do you get a cumulative figure

by

adding up the weeky figures

Cummulative is a total. It doesn't take into account if there are more samples taken. A weekly figure is only comparable if the number of samples is the same. In this case it clearly is not.

Not to mention the fact that the same number of viewing hours per week (14) counts as 7 views for the NRL and only 4.5 views for the AFL.

Not to mention the Bs that is the regional ratings.

BUT BUT BUT ............

Ha, nice try. Don't claim your games weekly total is bigger because of a total figure for the season champ. You have more games per season plus rep games. That's hardly but but but

Xman regional people are people too. Why are you discriminating against regional folk?

King-Eliagh wrote:

Xman regional people are people too. Why are you discriminating against regional folk?

oh they don't exist in the minds of VFL derpsters E

but but but derp derp derp ............. doing the Xman

King-Eliagh wrote:

Xman regional people are people too. Why are you discriminating against regional folk?

Haha. Tasmanian, south Australian and western Australian regional people are people too you know. Why are you discriminating against these folk? :D

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Xman regional people are people too. Why are you discriminating against regional folk?

Haha. Tasmanian, south Australian and western Australian regional people are people too you know. Why are you discriminating against these folk?

Was going to say just that. So KE, Raider, pussycat and co? Why do you discriminate? If we can't count everyone, we should ignore the regional ratings as far as I'm concerned. They are dodgey otherwise.

King-Eliagh wrote:

I can see Raider's point re this crowd is supposed to be a historic match but its really drawing a poor crowd and we all know when anz aint over 55-60k the atmosphere is miserable in there.

Oh FFS. What would you know?

I know from being there, even with only 19k for Swans vs Kangaroos in a final there a few years back, the atmosphere was electric and amazing. Many Swans supporters said as much on RedandWhiteOnline at the time. The Swans vs Blues final with 40k comes to mind too.

Watch and take note stupid. You clearly have no idea what you're talking about.



Besides that you're a suckhole for anything that fool Raider sprouts. Pathetic really.

I'm not discriminating against those regional folk you mention Xman, I'm not the one blurting regionals shouldnt count.

It'd be great to add those regionals in as well. Can either Xman or beaussie summon those regional numbers, add them up and include them in? I'm sure the regional pop of Tas, WA and SA make up about a fifth of the regional pop in nsw and qld

Yes now i know why you folk are so discriminatory to Australias people living in regional areas.

Beaussie wrote:

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Xman regional people are people too. Why are you discriminating against regional folk?

Haha. Tasmanian, south Australian and western Australian regional people are people too you know. Why are you discriminating against these folk?

Was going to say just that. So KE, Raider, pussycat and co? Why do you discriminate? If we can't count everyone, we should ignore the regional ratings as far as I'm concerned. They are dodgey otherwise.

count em then F wit

you still fall...... way ..... way short

As you know, those markets are not counted by RegionalTAM. Flawed and dodgey like I said.

King-Eliagh wrote:

I'm not discriminating against those regional folk you mention Xman, I'm not the one blurting regionals shouldnt count.

It'd be great to add those regionals in as well. Can either Xman or beaussie summon those regional numbers, add them up and include them in? I'm sure the regional pop of Tas, WA and SA make up about a fifth of the regional pop in nsw and qld Yes now i know why you folk are so discriminatory to Australias people living in regional areas.

almost spot on E

regional Population of NSW ... the ACT & QLD
nearly 6 Million

regional population of WA.. SA & the entire population of Tas & NT ( not convinced its entirely theres as League is quite strong in Darwin)
but anyhoo
about 1.6 Million

&

E... did you know
600K of these are in fact counted ......... in the metro figures for Adelaide & Perth
& Tasmanias numbers are available on the regionaltam website

whopped are the VFL
whopped good

You two are sickening the way you suck up to each other. As biased and stupid as one another.