King-Eliagh wrote:Stop changing the meaning of the topic Xman. Its easy and childish to change the meaning of things to suit yourself abd us common amongst toddlers.
The meaning of this file is set on which code was the original code which had an anzac day tradition. Who gives a rats anus what the crowds were Xman you whining snotty nosed toddler.
To take a line from an old clasic member named 'truthsayer'. GROW UP!
And had massive crowds of 5k for some games. They had no tradition, it was just scheduled on the day. Once the AFL made a huge day of it and it was so successful the NRL copied with the storm v warriors game. This is exactly what beaus said and is totally correct.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Xman wrote:The minutes silence thread means..........King-Eliagh wrote:Oh My GOD! What a classic thread. And there I was thinking the first BS file shamed the AFL mob in here. This one takes the cake. They wanted the facts and they were provided. I've never seen such a display of shamful backpeddling in my life. Deadset hilarious! Xman thanks for the BS files idea, its proving to be a real eyeopener watching the AFL members weasling out ofe their own statements and their own creation of rules etc.
And what about NSWAFL in this thread?
How does this relate to the storm copying the successful AFL formula?
Remember the proof I posted showed the NRl staging multiple games between different teams on Anzac day at different venues in front of sometimes very small crowds. They now follow the AFL model.
That's why they aren't original. :D
What?
The NSWRL held full rounds over the years and at times held 1 game.
Why does it matter anyway?
By the time the VFL caught on, RL had done it every which way but loose.
Xman wrote:And had massive crowds of 5k for some games. They had no tradition, it was just scheduled on the day. Once the AFL made a huge day of it and it was so successful the NRL copied with the storm v warriors game. This is exactly what beaus said and is totally correct.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Xman wrote:The minutes silence thread means..........
How does this relate to the storm copying the successful AFL formula?
Remember the proof I posted showed the NRl staging multiple games between different teams on Anzac day at different venues in front of sometimes very small crowds. They now follow the AFL model.
That's why they aren't original. :D
What?
The NSWRL held full rounds over the years and at times held 1 game.
Why does it matter anyway?
By the time the VFL caught on, RL had done it every which way but loose.
But your certain little things are subjective interpretations of the posters meaning. Yet your interpretation is just that, yours. Doesn't mean it's right.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Play by your rules and you keep changing them, hey, it's not my fault I pick you guys up on certain lttle things is it?
Maybe you should read what you write before hitting post
Failed?Beaussie wrote:This challenge is ridiculous. Parra has clearly proven nothing but the fact that he tried to twist my words into something else, failing miserably. I for one couldn't give a rats which code first played on ANZAC Day. My original point was about the tradition of footy on ANZAC Day in Melbourne with the NRL/Storm copying the successful AFL. Funniest part is they fail just as badly as Parra has failed here.
Xman wrote:But your certain little things are subjective interpretations of the posters meaning. Yet your interpretation is just that, yours. Doesn't mean it's right.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Play by your rules and you keep changing them, hey, it's not my fault I pick you guys up on certain lttle things is it?
Maybe you should read what you write before hitting post
Tradition? Different grounds, different teams, poor crowds......ParraEelsNRL wrote:Xman wrote:And had massive crowds of 5k for some games. They had no tradition, it was just scheduled on the day. Once the AFL made a huge day of it and it was so successful the NRL copied with the storm v warriors game. This is exactly what beaus said and is totally correct.ParraEelsNRL wrote:
What?
The NSWRL held full rounds over the years and at times held 1 game.
Why does it matter anyway?
By the time the VFL caught on, RL had done it every which way but loose.
Hey, 1 game might've had 5k while the other was played in front of a big crowd.
Back then, Souths, Saints, Roosters were the big teams while todays big teams were strugglers back then.
NSWAFL wrote:Name all the ANZAC medal winners from 1926, Parra.
AFL moved grounds and have had other teams play.Xman wrote:Tradition? Different grounds, different teams, poor crowds......ParraEelsNRL wrote:Xman wrote:And had massive crowds of 5k for some games. They had no tradition, it was just scheduled on the day. Once the AFL made a huge day of it and it was so successful the NRL copied with the storm v warriors game. This is exactly what beaus said and is totally correct.
Hey, 1 game might've had 5k while the other was played in front of a big crowd.
Back then, Souths, Saints, Roosters were the big teams while todays big teams were strugglers back then.
The AFL got it right.the NRL copied the formula.
A best and smartest point for be.
