www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
Xman wrote:youre proof is from last year, well done. Unfortunately this claim is this year.
Fail.
Raiderdave wrote:its stands to reason ... nothing would be different this year
oh so none of the 12K from last year have bought a membership this yearcos789 wrote:Raiderdave wrote:its stands to reason ... nothing would be different this year
Since the foundation memberships on offer are completely different to the ticketed games membership on offer
it stand to reason the members will be different.
You don't get it do you. This is a different year. Last years memberships were different, with difference incentives and meanings for giants fans. They have gone from a purely support based membership to an attendance focussed membership.Raiderdave wrote:oh so none of the 12K from last year have bought a membership this yearcos789 wrote:Raiderdave wrote:its stands to reason ... nothing would be different this year
Since the foundation memberships on offer are completely different to the ticketed games membership on offer
it stand to reason the members will be different.
its a different 4K completely is it ?
idiot
almost certainly the 33% who have signed up out of the 12K from last year .. to date are from the same area's as last year
if 25% from western sydney signed up for a foundation membership ... then 25% have signed up for a proper one too
if 40% from Canberra signed up for a foundation membership....then 40% have signed up for a proper one too
logic tells you this
but of course try explaining that to the most delusional ... illogical ... drop kicks on the face of the earth .... flogball fans
& you get the above comical.... borderline sad.. comments
different yearXman wrote:You don't get it do you. This is a different year. Last years memberships were different, with difference incentives and meanings for giants fans. They have gone from a purely support based membership to an attendance focussed membership.Raiderdave wrote:oh so none of the 12K from last year have bought a membership this yearcos789 wrote:
Since the foundation memberships on offer are completely different to the ticketed games membership on offer
it stand to reason the members will be different.
its a different 4K completely is it ?
idiot
almost certainly the 33% who have signed up out of the 12K from last year .. to date are from the same area's as last year
if 25% from western sydney signed up for a foundation membership ... then 25% have signed up for a proper one too
if 40% from Canberra signed up for a foundation membership....then 40% have signed up for a proper one too
logic tells you this
but of course try explaining that to the most delusional ... illogical ... drop kicks on the face of the earth .... flogball fans
& you get the above comical.... borderline sad.. comments
You cannot prove the proportions this year are the same as last year, yet this is what you are claiming as fact.
You genuinely are a BS artist!
So we're is your proof they are from the same areas?Raiderdave wrote:different yearXman wrote:You don't get it do you. This is a different year. Last years memberships were different, with difference incentives and meanings for giants fans. They have gone from a purely support based membership to an attendance focussed membership.Raiderdave wrote:oh so none of the 12K from last year have bought a membership this year
its a different 4K completely is it ?
idiot
almost certainly the 33% who have signed up out of the 12K from last year .. to date are from the same area's as last year
if 25% from western sydney signed up for a foundation membership ... then 25% have signed up for a proper one too
if 40% from Canberra signed up for a foundation membership....then 40% have signed up for a proper one too
logic tells you this
but of course try explaining that to the most delusional ... illogical ... drop kicks on the face of the earth .... flogball fans
& you get the above comical.... borderline sad.. comments
You cannot prove the proportions this year are the same as last year, yet this is what you are claiming as fact.
You genuinely are a BS artist!
same members ( albeit in far far smaller numbers ) ... from the same areas
and even in the highly unlikely event that most of the 4K are from western sydney
I'd hate to see that first crowd for that first game in Canberra because according to you if this is the case
almost no one from Canberra has taken up a membership for 2012..........
you have no proof it isn't .... I have a factual breakdown of their demographic from last yearXman wrote:So we're is your proof they are from the same areas?Raiderdave wrote:different yearXman wrote:You don't get it do you. This is a different year. Last years memberships were different, with difference incentives and meanings for giants fans. They have gone from a purely support based membership to an attendance focussed membership.
You cannot prove the proportions this year are the same as last year, yet this is what you are claiming as fact.
You genuinely are a BS artist!
same members ( albeit in far far smaller numbers ) ... from the same areas
and even in the highly unlikely event that most of the 4K are from western sydney
I'd hate to see that first crowd for that first game in Canberra because according to you if this is the case
almost no one from Canberra has taken up a membership for 2012..........
It doesn't have to be half from WS, you said 1k. You had no proof, just bs as usual.
I didn't make a claim as fact, you did. I'm not stupid enough to make such a claim without at least saying it was my opinion. You think it's fact despite no proof of this years make up.Raiderdave wrote:you have no proof it isn't .... I have a factual breakdown of their demographic from last yearXman wrote:So we're is your proof they are from the same areas?Raiderdave wrote:different year
same members ( albeit in far far smaller numbers ) ... from the same areas
and even in the highly unlikely event that most of the 4K are from western sydney
I'd hate to see that first crowd for that first game in Canberra because according to you if this is the case
almost no one from Canberra has taken up a membership for 2012..........
It doesn't have to be half from WS, you said 1k. You had no proof, just bs as usual.
but lets say all 3K foundation members from western sydney ..( or even more ) did sign up for a full membership
f me .....
that doesn't leave much anywhere else does it
Xman wrote:I didn't make a claim as fact, you did. I'm not stupid enough to make such a claim without at least saying it was my opinion. You think it's fact despite no proof of this years make up.Raiderdave wrote:you have no proof it isn't .... I have a factual breakdown of their demographic from last yearXman wrote:So we're is your proof they are from the same areas?
It doesn't have to be half from WS, you said 1k. You had no proof, just bs as usual.
but lets say all 3K foundation members from western sydney ..( or even more ) did sign up for a full membership
f me .....
that doesn't leave much anywhere else does it
2011, a year where the team played no official AFL games, is totally different to 2012, where they play a number of games in WS. The benefits of being a local member are far greater this year.
Bottom line, you made a claim based on old data and therefore it was bs!
Oh and you still need to prove AFL ratings have dropped 30% in 5 years too. So far you're going to lose that one as well.
I've already helped him out since he's busy. So far he's winning. =D>Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:I didn't make a claim as fact, you did. I'm not stupid enough to make such a claim without at least saying it was my opinion. You think it's fact despite no proof of this years make up.Raiderdave wrote:you have no proof it isn't .... I have a factual breakdown of their demographic from last year
but lets say all 3K foundation members from western sydney ..( or even more ) did sign up for a full membership
f me .....
that doesn't leave much anywhere else does it
2011, a year where the team played no official AFL games, is totally different to 2012, where they play a number of games in WS. The benefits of being a local member are far greater this year.
Bottom line, you made a claim based on old data and therefore it was bs!
Oh and you still need to prove AFL ratings have dropped 30% in 5 years too. So far you're going to lose that one as well.
no Beaussie needs to prove it didn't
NSWAFL wrote:Dave is a gutless wonder because he won't go into the BS file and make these statements. So I've helped him out and quoted him there. Of course all he's doing is making a fool of himself as usual.
LolRaiderdave wrote:NSWAFL wrote:Dave is a gutless wonder because he won't go into the BS file and make these statements. So I've helped him out and quoted him there. Of course all he's doing is making a fool of himself as usual.
no
I'll continue to avoid that load of inept ... inconsistent .. biased .... corrupt BS
& fight my battles in the open where everyone can see the above corruption
it was Xmans wish to hide his bias in a thread
out here ..... it is exposed
Well said. =D>Xman wrote:LolRaiderdave wrote:NSWAFL wrote:Dave is a gutless wonder because he won't go into the BS file and make these statements. So I've helped him out and quoted him there. Of course all he's doing is making a fool of himself as usual.
no
I'll continue to avoid that load of inept ... inconsistent .. biased .... corrupt BS
& fight my battles in the open where everyone can see the above corruption
it was Xmans wish to hide his bias in a thread
out here ..... it is exposed
It was Beaussie who made it into a subforum. It's in it's own subforum because its easier to keep the fights on topic, and so they don't swamp the front page of this forum.
Your ability to qualify your claims is a disgrace. The concept is perfect at proving what a stupid lying loud mouth you really are. How about actually defending you're comments for once!