Page 9 of 12

Re: Kelvin Shoddy & his knowledge of Sydney

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:34 pm
by Topper
Epic fail if you ask me.

Re: Kelvin Shoddy & his knowledge of Sydney

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:40 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
All you've proved Dave is that you can imbellish dermotss statement. He nev said they'd take over like a tsunami! He said they would have an impact significant enough for the NRl to take notice.

Post dippers comments again please.

Any others?

So far your statement is looking very very thin!
yep ... thats what one does in a forum
take it one step further to encourage debate ....

& no
I won't post it again ... I've done that once ... you find it
K
Ok, so far you have dippers comments as proof. Dermott never said or inferred a tsunami.

I'd suggest you've failed unless you find others.
I'd suggest thats your opinion .... I disagree & believe thats all the proof I need

Re: Kelvin Shoddy & his knowledge of Sydney

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:47 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
yep ... thats what one does in a forum
take it one step further to encourage debate ....

& no
I won't post it again ... I've done that once ... you find it
K
Ok, so far you have dippers comments as proof. Dermott never said or inferred a tsunami.

I'd suggest you've failed unless you find others.
I'd suggest thats your opinion .... I disagree & believe thats all the proof I need
Your original statement said that AFL fans were "jumping out of the woodwork" to say how the GwS would be a tsunami. So far you've shown two examples, one of which was clearly not talking tsunamis. In my book that ain't even close to fans jumping out of the woodwork.

Any other sources?

Re: Kelvin Shoddy & his knowledge of Sydney

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:55 pm
by Topper
If he doesn't provide any other sources, I suggest action.

Re: Kelvin Shoddy & his knowledge of Sydney

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:57 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Ok, so far you have dippers comments as proof. Dermott never said or inferred a tsunami.

I'd suggest you've failed unless you find others.
I'd suggest thats your opinion .... I disagree & believe thats all the proof I need
Your original statement said that AFL fans were "jumping out of the woodwork" to say how the GwS would be a tsunami. So far you've shown two examples, one of which was clearly not talking tsunamis. In my book that ain't even close to fans jumping out of the woodwork.

Any other sources?
yep ... 2 examples of the many out there .. is enough in MY opinion.
don't care what your opinion is . :wink:

Re: Kelvin Shoddy & his knowledge of Sydney

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:59 pm
by King-Eliagh
Topper, the little deaf/blind outcast of the fightclub :lol:

I think Raider provides decent evidence here Xman. You object but in a petty manner really.

Re: Kelvin Shoddy & his knowledge of Sydney

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:09 pm
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:
Topper, the little deaf/blind outcast of the fightclub :lol:

I think Raider provides decent evidence here Xman. You object but in a petty manner really.
So coming out of the woodwork means 2 does it? One wasn't saying tsunamis either.

Ok, mental note. Coming out of the woodwork means one person.

Re: Kelvin Shoddy & his knowledge of Sydney

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:10 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
I'd suggest thats your opinion .... I disagree & believe thats all the proof I need
Your original statement said that AFL fans were "jumping out of the woodwork" to say how the GwS would be a tsunami. So far you've shown two examples, one of which was clearly not talking tsunamis. In my book that ain't even close to fans jumping out of the woodwork.

Any other sources?
yep ... 2 examples of the many out there .. is enough in MY opinion.
don't care what your opinion is . :wink:
Well that's your opinion. Good for you.

Re: Kelvin Shoddy & his knowledge of Sydney

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:11 pm
by Raiderdave
King-Eliagh wrote:
Topper, the little deaf/blind outcast of the fightclub :lol:

I think Raider provides decent evidence here Xman. You object but in a petty manner really.
look out E

you need to provide evidence of this :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Kelvin Shoddy & his knowledge of Sydney

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:13 pm
by Topper
Xman wrote:
King-Eliagh wrote:
Topper, the little deaf/blind outcast of the fightclub :lol:

I think Raider provides decent evidence here Xman. You object but in a petty manner really.
So coming out of the woodwork means 2 does it? One wasn't saying tsunamis either.

Ok, mental note. Coming out of the woodwork means one person.
I think I may be able to source something that contradicts that definition, Xman.

Re: Kelvin Shoddy & his knowledge of Sydney

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:18 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
King-Eliagh wrote:
Topper, the little deaf/blind outcast of the fightclub :lol:

I think Raider provides decent evidence here Xman. You object but in a petty manner really.
look out E

you need to provide evidence of this :lol: :lol: :lol:
You still don't get this whole "I think" and proof part do you?

Re: Kelvin Shoddy & his knowledge of Sydney

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:32 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
King-Eliagh wrote:
Topper, the little deaf/blind outcast of the fightclub :lol:

I think Raider provides decent evidence here Xman. You object but in a petty manner really.
look out E

you need to provide evidence of this :lol: :lol: :lol:
You still don't get this whole "I think" and proof part do you?

I do ...
I think is just fine for fight club. :wink:

Re: Kelvin Shoddy & his knowledge of Sydney

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:52 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
look out E

you need to provide evidence of this :lol: :lol: :lol:
You still don't get this whole "I think" and proof part do you?

I do ...
I think is just fine for fight club. :wink:
Good, youre finally getting it! =D>

Re: Kelvin Shoddy & his knowledge of Sydney

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:07 pm
by NSWAFL
I think it's not fine for the fight club. I think it's fine for a trolling farm.

Re: Kelvin Shoddy & his knowledge of Sydney

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:20 pm
by Raiderdave
NSWAFL wrote:
I think it's not fine for the fight club. I think it's fine for a trolling farm.

then theres the door

see ya :wink: