Page 9 of 10

Re: RL - has little to no contest for possession, or interes

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:38 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Wrong. The swans and lions are on payTV regularly. Check the table of ratings on this forum. Pay tv only get the option of a few games therefore they can't just chose any game they want. More often than not QLD and nsw therefore get the lions and swans on both payTV and FTA. This has been happening for years! If QLD get the lions on FTA and the only payTV game is the lions who else are they going to show??? There's no other game they can show!

As if you can average the storms 3home and away games plus 2 finals and compare that to the swans full season of home and away games. Interesting how you've jumped off comparing to the lions, who despite being bottom of the ladder, probably had a higher FTA average than the storm for home and away games, despite half the population in bris and the same game being on payTV.
wot kind of a ninconpoop are you ? #-o

its called a schedule .... they don't clash
why the hell would they ?

heres a tip
the markets that don't have any FTA ratings are watching the pay game .... while another game is on FTA ... not the same friggin game you goose

if its the only game on pay ... you get locked out
& why wouldn't you ... why would 10/7 pay what they did for games .. only to allow Foxtel to cover one of their games
that " special" arrangement starts ... this year :roll:

you are a nutter
& again ... proven to have absolutely no idea what your talking about :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
You fool. The AFL and networks have arranged the schedules so the lions suns and swans are on FTA in northern states for all their games. PLUS the same game is shown on payTV for southern markets so the fans in these states can see their team play against the lions suns and swans.

Well, foxtel have limited options. They don't just show a different game to northern states and southern states. They have the one game which is the suns, lions and swans game. This game gets shown to all Australian markets. For the northern states this means it's on fox and FTA!

Have a look at the table on this forum. It shows the games that were on fox. It shows the games that were exclusive on FTA to northern states. This shows which games were on FTA and fox for northern states, which was often the same game showing the lions suns and swans.

Even the other dopes on LU know this. What's your problem??

what bloody table ? :-k

Re: RL - has little to no contest for possession, or interes

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:41 pm
by Xman
Oh dear. Give it away idiot.

Go ask el dickhead. He'll set you straight.

Re: RL - has little to no contest for possession, or interes

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:46 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Oh dear. Give it away idiot.

Go ask el ********. He'll set you straight.
if El Busto fell for your BS ... more the fool him

I won't

why would 10/7 pay the money they did
& allow foxtel to simulcast their game in that market while its on FTA .. what did they pay for ?
hows this years deal any different

oh thats right ... they didn't

the Sthn states got this game on pay
the market the FTA game was on in .. did not .. a replay at best :wink:

Re: RL - has little to no contest for possession, or interes

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:50 pm
by Xman
Example:

Round 1 last year had two games on Saturday night: Adelaide v hawthorn, Brisbane v Fremantle.

FTA for Perth and Brisbane was the lions v dockers game

FTA for the rest of the country was the crows v hawks

FOXtel for the entire country was the Lions v dockers game.

Therefore Brisbane had the lions on foxtel AND FTA, which rated 115k. The same game rated 128k on foxtel.

Get it yet gimp?

Re: RL - has little to no contest for possession, or interes

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:52 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Oh dear. Give it away idiot.

Go ask el ********. He'll set you straight.
if El Busto fell for your BS ... more the fool him

I won't

why would 10/7 pay the money they did
& allow foxtel to simulcast their game in that market while its on FTA .. what did they pay for ?
hows this years deal any different

oh thats right ... they didn't

the Sthn states got this game on pay
the market the FTA game was on in .. did not .. a replay at best :wink:
:lol: :lol:

Can we frame this? This post should be kept as example of why cousins should never mate!

Re: RL - has little to no contest for possession, or interes

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:53 pm
by Beaussie
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Oh dear. Give it away idiot.

Go ask el ********. He'll set you straight.
if El Busto fell for your BS ... more the fool him

I won't

why would 10/7 pay the money they did
& allow foxtel to simulcast their game in that market while its on FTA .. what did they pay for ?
hows this years deal any different

oh thats right ... they didn't

the Sthn states got this game on pay
the market the FTA game was on in .. did not .. a replay at best :wink:
Fuck you are dumb.

Swans, Lions and Suns games are often simulcast on Fox and 10/7

Here is an example of a Swans game from the SCG. Obviously would have been live in Sydney. Notice the watermark in the top right corner stupid. #-o


Re: RL - has little to no contest for possession, or interes

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:57 pm
by Xman
Beaussie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Oh dear. Give it away idiot.

Go ask el ********. He'll set you straight.
if El Busto fell for your BS ... more the fool him

I won't

why would 10/7 pay the money they did
& allow foxtel to simulcast their game in that market while its on FTA .. what did they pay for ?
hows this years deal any different

oh thats right ... they didn't

the Sthn states got this game on pay
the market the FTA game was on in .. did not .. a replay at best :wink:
**** you are dumb.

Swans, Lions and Suns games are often simulcast on Fox and 10/7

Here is an example of a Swans game from the SCG. Obviously would have been live in Sydney. Notice the watermark in the top right corner stupid. #-o

Cheers Beaussie.

Raider is clearly "special". We should probably go easy on him. :?>

Re: RL - has little to no contest for possession, or interes

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 8:03 pm
by Xman
And so raiderdave's house of cards finally comes tumbling down!

He now realizes the lions, swans and suns ratings are quite a bit higher than he first thought.

He now realizes AFL is bigger in NSW and QLD than he first thought.

Poor guy. Chin up mate.

Re: RL - has little to no contest for possession, or interes

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 8:06 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Example:

Round 1 last year had two games on Saturday night: Adelaide v hawthorn, Brisbane v Fremantle.

FTA for Perth and Brisbane was the lions v dockers game

FTA for the rest of the country was the crows v hawks

FOXtel for the entire country was the Lions v dockers game.

Therefore Brisbane had the lions on foxtel AND FTA, which rated 115k. The same game rated 128k on foxtel.

Get it yet gimp?
rubbish
get it :wink:

Re: RL - has little to no contest for possession, or interes

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 8:08 pm
by Beaussie
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Example:

Round 1 last year had two games on Saturday night: Adelaide v hawthorn, Brisbane v Fremantle.

FTA for Perth and Brisbane was the lions v dockers game

FTA for the rest of the country was the crows v hawks

FOXtel for the entire country was the Lions v dockers game.

Therefore Brisbane had the lions on foxtel AND FTA, which rated 115k. The same game rated 128k on foxtel.

Get it yet gimp?
rubbish
get it :wink:
Oh FFS, give up already. You look stupid with each post trying to deny the obvious. #-o

Re: RL - has little to no contest for possession, or interes

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 8:11 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Example:

Round 1 last year had two games on Saturday night: Adelaide v hawthorn, Brisbane v Fremantle.

FTA for Perth and Brisbane was the lions v dockers game

FTA for the rest of the country was the crows v hawks

FOXtel for the entire country was the Lions v dockers game.

Therefore Brisbane had the lions on foxtel AND FTA, which rated 115k. The same game rated 128k on foxtel.

Get it yet gimp?
rubbish
get it :wink:
Surely you're taking the piss now. You can't honestly think you're right still.

If you dont believe me you tell me the TV schedule for round 1 of the AFL season last year then. Foxtel covered only one of the 2 games on that night. FTA covered both but to different markets. Either way the same city got the game on both FTA and payTV. It so happened that Brisbane got the lions on both.

Re: RL - has little to no contest for possession, or interes

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 8:17 pm
by Raiderdave
Beaussie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Example:

Round 1 last year had two games on Saturday night: Adelaide v hawthorn, Brisbane v Fremantle.

FTA for Perth and Brisbane was the lions v dockers game

FTA for the rest of the country was the crows v hawks

FOXtel for the entire country was the Lions v dockers game.

Therefore Brisbane had the lions on foxtel AND FTA, which rated 115k. The same game rated 128k on foxtel.

Get it yet gimp?
rubbish
get it :wink:
Oh FFS, give up already. You look stupid with each post trying to deny the obvious. #-o
the stupid one here is xman
BS'ing his way all ova this thread .... its a shame for him... hes been found out
:wink:

Re: RL - has little to no contest for possession, or interes

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 9:55 pm
by Topper
That is why I call him a burp machine.

Re: RL - has little to no contest for possession, or interes

Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 7:43 pm
by King-Eliagh
Hi Topper you lil scallywag you :wave:

Re: RL - has little to no contest for possession, or interes

Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 8:36 pm
by cos789
Intentcity wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
Oh FFS, give up already. You look stupid with each post trying to deny the obvious. #-o
the stupid one here is xman
BS'ing his way all ova this thread .... its a shame for him... hes been found out
:wink:

**** mate, at least change the subject if you're not going to admit defeat.

You have been weighed, you have been measured, and, you have been found wanting.
I think it'sphysically impossible for these guys to admit the truth.